THE BRONZE SHIELD FROM THE BURIAL OF A MEDIEVAL ARCHER IN THE KUZNETSK DESPRESSION

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 265-270
Author(s):  
PILIPENKO S. ◽  
◽  
SULEIMENOV M. ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Significant Role ◽  
Western Siberia ◽  
Volga Region ◽  
Burial Ground ◽  
The South ◽  
Protective Shield

A number of works written by leading Siberian weapons experts are devoted to the classification of this piece of personal armour. Issues of weapons development played a significant role in the lives of the medieval people in the South of Western Siberia. One of the most frequently encountered categories of inventory in the burials of nomads includes ranged weapons: parts of bows, arrows, quivers. Yu.S. Khudyakova [1980, p. 118] and VV. Gorbunova [2006, p. 35-62]. However, bow sets are not limited to bows, arrows and quivers. There are also other parts of archery equipment known from the nomadic antiquities of the Volga region, such as archers’ rings and pavises [Rudenko, 2005, p. 27-35], items that have never been found in the South of Western Siberia until recently. During his exploration of burial ground 3 from mound 3 of Konevo, A.M. Ilyushin [2012, p. 37] found a bronze plate, which he believed belonged to plate armour. However, further study of the objects found in burial ground 3 of mound 3 of Konevo, raised doubts whether this attribution of the excavated bronze plate is justified. Acquaintance with the materials of burial 3 of mound 3 of the Konevo burial ground, raised doubts about such an attribution of the revealed bronze plate. Keywords: medieval nomads, archeology, bow, arrows, protective shield, pavise, gastagna, archer, Kuznetsk Depression

scholarly journals Lamellar armor from the kurganny burial ground October

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 84-89
Author(s):  
M. G. Suleymenov ◽  
◽  
A. M. Ilyushin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Western Siberia ◽  
Northern China ◽  
Burial Ground ◽  
The South

The article materials of an iron armor from excavation of barrow № 1 on the burial ground October in Kuznetsk Depression are investigated the XI–XII the centuries. The description and classification of armor-clad plates is provided. To the allocated types analogies in the syanbiyskikh sources of Northern China and materials of the end of Iare given – began II thousand in the south of Western Siberia. The conclusion that the armor consisting of rigid and mobile parts of a protective armor was put in a grave is drawn.

scholarly journals Typological originality of secondary dialects with the south Russian basis in the Middle Volga Region

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 160-167
Author(s):  
T. E. Bazhenova
Keyword(s):  
Volga Region ◽  
Left Bank ◽  
The South ◽  
Middle Volga Region ◽  
The Status ◽  
Middle Volga ◽  
Russian Dialect ◽  
Favorable Conditions ◽  
Linguistic Basis

The article highlights the problem of the typology of dialects of the Middle Volga region. Particular attention is paid to secondary dialects with signs of South Russian dialect bases, the status of which in the Volga atlases is determined ambiguously. The area of the described dialect type is indicated. It is indicated that in the left-bank part of the Middle Volga region, in the so-called Trans-Volga region, there is a high probability of the existence of secondary Central Russian dialects with the preservation of signs of southern Russian maternal stems. The main source is data from regional atlases. The materials of dialectological expeditions to the villages of the Samara region are used. The description of the typological characteristics of the secondary dialects with a southern base, which are designated on the maps of regional atlases as Central Russian, is based on the analysis of isogloss of phonetic, grammatical and proper lexical dialect phenomena. In dialects with a completed transition to Central Russian, typologically significant South Russian features are types of yakany with the preservation of vowel dissimilation, obstruent pronunciation of g of secondary origin and other phonetic, morphological and lexical features that make up the series of two-term dialectal correspondences. According to the linguistic basis, such dialects are often polydialectal. In some dialects, the South Russian basis is not in doubt, and we can only state the beginning of the transition to the Central Russian type. The question is raised about the existence of secondary dialect types, formed as a result of the assimilation of dialects of the South Russian dialect with other dialects, not only in the Volga region, but also in other territories with favorable conditions for inter-dialectal contact. It is concluded that the presence of the Central Russian type and South Russian bases in the described dialects is possible only if there is a sufficient amount of information on typologically significant levels of the dialect language, in which systemic relations are clearly manifested and which are represented on linguistic maps by stable isoglosses. Data on secondary types of dialects should be based on the structural-typological classification of dialectal phenomena of various levels, including the lexical one.

(A review) E. D. Lapshina. The bog vegetation of the south-east West Siberia: monograph. Novosibirsk, 2010. 186 p.

2012 ◽  
pp. 135-138
Author(s):  
B. M. Mirkin ◽  
L. G. Naumova ◽  
E. Z. Baisheva ◽  
V. B. Martynenko
Keyword(s):  
Western Siberia ◽  
West Siberia ◽  
The South ◽  
Large White ◽  
White Spots ◽  
Northern Regions ◽  
Floristic Classification ◽  
East West ◽  
Vast Territory

Progress floristic classification of the vegetation of Russia is obvious (Mirkin, Ermakov, 2010; Mirkin, Naumova, 2011). However, in the vast territory of the country are still many «white spots», vegetation which syntaxonomically not been studied. One of these large «white spots» — the vegetation of the bogs. For years, the «monopolist» in ecologo-floristic classification of wetlands was V. A. Smagin (student major Soviet bolotoved M. S. Boch). He studied the vegetation of wetlands of the Northern regions of the European taiga and the basin of Myriagon Surgut Polesie (Smagin, 1998, 2000, 2003, etc.). Peer-reviewed monograph on the vegetation of mires in Western Siberia can be considered as a breakthrough in the syntaxonomy of this type of vegetation. Moreover, as a result of the work of E. D. Lapshina picture of syntaxonomy of bog vegetation has changed so much that one can speak about a kind of «syntaxa of the revolution».

scholarly journals Two New Daggers of Early Sarmatian Shape from Chui Valley

2020 ◽  
pp. 120-128
Author(s):  
Sergei Ivanov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Significant Role ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
Morphological Features ◽  
Tien Shan ◽  
Volga Region ◽  
South Urals ◽  
Forest Steppe ◽  
The South ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Region Analysis

The article is concerned with the publication of two new finds of early Sarmatian shape iron daggers, found in the southern foothill zone of the Chui valley (Kyrgyzstan). This category of weapons is considered as a rare find on the territory of the spread of the Saka culture of Tien Shan region. Therefore, each new find of such items significantly expands the understanding of the features of the formations and development of the blade weapons in this territory. The first dagger by its morphological features was dated to the late half of the 5th – first half of the 4th centuries BC. Similar analogies were discovered on the territory of the Forest-Steppe Altai, the Volga region and the South Urals, which allowed to clarify its chronological framework. The second dagger was dated by the author back to the first half of the 3rd century BC. At the same time the closest morphological parallels are found mainly in the Sarmatian materials of the South Urals region. Analysis of the data of the two daggers showed that Tien Shan region was already quite early in the southern periphery of the original territory of formation of the early Sarmatian-type blade weapons. It is noteworthy that cultural interrelationships not only with the territories of the Southern Urals and Volga region, but also with the Forest-Steppe Altai, played a significant role in appearance and spread of the daggers there.

Zoya Il'inichna Glezer – life and scientific achievements

2019 ◽  
pp. 318-323
Author(s):  
Zinaida V. Pushina ◽  
Galina V. Stepanova ◽  
Ekaterina L. Grundan
Keyword(s):  
Western Siberia ◽  
Kara Sea ◽  
European Russia ◽  
Great Contribution ◽  
The South ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Scientific Achievements ◽  
South Of European Russia

Zoya Ilyinichna Glezer is the largest Russian micropaleontologist, a specialist in siliceous microfossils — Cenozoic diatoms and silicoflagellates. Since the 1960s, she systematically studied Paleogene siliceous microfossils from various regions of the country and therefore was an indispensable participant in the development of unified stratigraphic schemes for Paleogene siliceous plankton of various regions of the USSR. She made a great contribution to the creation of the newest Paleogene schemes in the south of European Russia and Western Siberia, to the correlations of the Paleogene deposits of the Kara Sea.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document