The role of surprise on persuasion in industrial design

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar R. Rodríguez Ramírez
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-157
Author(s):  
Matthew Holt

Abstract In order to contribute to the widening and enriching of the notion of aesthetics as it applies to design and so to the historian’s task in this field, this essay examines the theories of aesthetics promulgated at the Hochschule für Gestaltung at Ulm (1953–1968), still a much-understudied institution. In particular, it will investigate the confluence at that school of semiotics and semantics, information aesthetics, and experimental aesthetics. It looks at the break Ulm made with its predecessor, the Bauhaus, on the role of art and aesthetics in design. That break is seen as result of the HfG’s re-evaluation of the profile and substance of industrial design, a re-evaluation itself contingent on an updated understanding of the contemporary ‘environment’ (Umwelt). The article also examines the key aesthetic theories of the figures who passed through Ulm and shaped its curriculum in order to establish the influence of those figures on the wider history of design.


2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salla Toppinen-Tanner ◽  
Raija Kalimo

This study investigated the role of the sense of coherence in occupational well-being at three organizational positions of industrial designing (top-level designers, designers, and assisting personnel). In a sample of 422 industrial design personnel, sense of coherence was positively related to competence and negatively to psychological symptoms. It also moderated the relation of autonomy to competence and psychological symptoms but more strongly among the designers and the assisting personnel than among the top-level designers. Analysis showed autonomy was beneficial for individuals who also had high scores on sense of coherence. Longitudinal studies are needed on the role of sense of coherence as regards the psychological health of different subgroups.


2016 ◽  
Vol 693 ◽  
pp. 1960-1965
Author(s):  
Xiao Dong Li

Based on the full cognition of the role of which new materials plays in industrial design, and combining the development of science and technology with increasing environmental awareness of human, this paper discusses the importance of new materials applications in contemporary industrial design. From the aspect of morphological characteristics, visual characteristics, features and bionic intelligence and so on, it analyzes the application effects of new materials in industrial design, showing that materials and industry design have the relationships that they permeate with each other, and they both play a significant role in the development of industrial design.


Design Issues ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-59
Author(s):  
Clive Dilnot ◽  
Lilián Sánchez-Moreno

An edited presentation of an extended interview with the design historian John Heskett undertaken a few months after the publication of Heskett's Industrial Design (Thames and Hudson, 1980). Part One explores the genesis and structure of Industrial Design, as well as wider problems in the writing of histories of design. Part Two examines circumstances and tensions in regard to understanding the roles of design and the designer in the processes of industrialization especially with regard to emerging tensions between “production” and “consumption” and “industry” and “craft” in design historical understanding in the late 1970s/early 1980s.


Author(s):  
David H Cropley ◽  
James C Kaufman

For many years, researchers have debated the role of “domain” in creativity. Opinion remains divided, but a common view is that creativity is a combination of domain-general elements, coupled with domain-specific manifestations, usually in the form of different kinds of products. Discussions of domains and creativity frequently take place in very broad, thematic terms, differentiating only between Arts and Sciences, with less attention given to differences within domains. The goal of this paper is to explore a single technological domain, studying differences between the micro-domains of Engineering and Industrial Design. Do engineers and industrial designers differ when evaluating the creativity of products? If they differ, what might be the underlying drivers of these differences? Contrary to expectations, not only were there significant differences between these groups, but evidence presented in this study suggests that engineers have difficulty differentiating between aesthetics and functionality, as components of product creativity, in contrast to industrial designers, who seem to possess a more discriminating eye.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document