Definition d’un nouveau parametre lineaire pour l’extrapolation des donne&ees des essais de rupture par fluage / Definition eines neuen linearen Parameters zur Extrapolation der Ergebnisse von Zeitstandversuchen / Definition of a new linear parameter for the extrapolation of creep rupture test data

1971 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 157-162
Author(s):  
Aurelian Constantinescu
1960 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 982-987
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Nakagawa ◽  
Yasuo Otoguro

Author(s):  
Peter F. Pelz ◽  
Stefan S. Stonjek

Acceptance tests on large fans to prove the performance (efficiency and total pressure rise) to the customer are expensive and sometimes even impossible to perform. Hence there is a need for the manufacturer to reliably predict the performance of fans from measurements on down-scaled test fans. The commonly used scale-up formulas give satisfactorily results only near the design point, where inertia losses are small in comparison to frictional losses. At part- and overload the inertia losses are dominant and the scale-up formulas used so far fail. In 2013 Pelz and Stonjek introduced a new scaling method which fullfills the demands ( [1], [2]). This method considers the influence of surface roughness and geometric variations on the performance. It consists basically of two steps: Initially, the efficiency is scaled. Efficiency scaling is derived analytically from the definition of the total efficiency. With the total derivative it can be shown that the change of friction coefficient is inversely proportional to the change of efficiency of a fan. The second step is shifting the performance characteristic to a higher value of flow coefficient. It is the task of this work to improve the scaling method which was previously introduced by Pelz and Stonjek by treating the rotor/impeller and volute/stator separately. The validation of the improved scale-up method is performed with test data from two axial fans with a diameter of 1000 mm/250mm and three centrifugal fans with 2240mm/896mm/224mm diameter. The predicted performance characteristics show a good agreement to test data.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (06n07) ◽  
pp. 1510-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
YONG-HA PARK ◽  
YONG-HO PARK ◽  
IK-MIN PARK ◽  
KYUNG-MOX CHO ◽  
JEONG-JUNG OAK ◽  
...  

Aluminum borate whisker (9( Al 2 O 3)·( B 2 O 3)) reinforced AS52(with and without strontium modification) metal matrix composites (MMC) were fabricated by the squeeze infiltration method. Creep rupture test was carried out at 150°C and 100 MPa condition. Results showed that Alborex reinforcement and modified polygonal shape Mg 2 Si phase contributed to the enhancement of mechanical properties and creep resistance. Creep rupture time was increased 11% and minimum creep rate was decreased 17% in the composite. At the Alborex/matrix interface, uniform thin layer of MgO was formed. The initiation of micro-voids at the reinforcement/matrix or Mg 2 Si /matrix interface was followed by their growth and coalescence to macro-cracks.


1990 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 854-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikuni Kadoya ◽  
Toru Goto ◽  
Shingo Date ◽  
Takayoshi Yamauchi ◽  
Tomikane Saida ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-252
Author(s):  
Balhassn S. M. Ali ◽  
Tom H. Hyde ◽  
Wei Sun

AbstractCommonly used small creep specimen types, such as ring and impression creep specimens, are capable of providing minimum creep strain rate data from small volumes of material. However, these test types are unable to provide the creep rupture data. In this paper the recently developed two-bar specimen type, which can be used to obtain minimum creep strain rate and creep rupture creep data from small volumes of material, is described. Conversion relationships are used to convert (i) the applied load to the equivalent uniaxial stress, and (ii) the load line deformation rate to the equivalent uniaxial creep strain rate. The effects of the specimen dimension ratios on the conversion factors are also discussed in this paper. This paper also shows comparisons between two-bar specimen creep test data and the corresponding uniaxial creep test data, for grade P91 steel at 650°C.


1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Wereszczak ◽  
T. P. Kirkland

The tensile creep-rupture performance of a commercially available gas pressure sintered silicon nitride (Si3N4) and a sintered silicon carbide (SiC) is examined at 1038, 1150, and 1350°C. These two ceramic materials are candidates for nozzles and combustor tiles that are to be retrofitted in land-based gas turbine engines, and interest exists to investigate their high-temperature mechanical performance over service times up to, and in excess of, 10,000 hours (≈14 months). To achieve lifetimes approaching 10,000 hours for the candidate Si3N4 ceramic, it was found (or it was estimated based on ongoing test data) that a static tensile stress of 300 MPa at 1038 and 1150°C, and a stress of 125 MPa at 1350°C cannot be exceeded. For the SiC ceramic, it was estimated from ongoing test data that a static tensile stress of 300 MPa at 1038°C, 250 MPa at 1150°C, and 180 MPa at 1350°C cannot be exceeded. The creep-stress exponents for this Si3N4 were determined to be 33, 17, and 8 for 1038, 1150, and 1350°C, respectively. The fatigue-stress exponents for the Si3N4 were found to be equivalent to the creep exponents, suggesting that the fatigue mechanism that ultimately causes fracture is controlled and related to the creep mechanisms. Little success was experienced at generating failures in the SiC after several decades of time through exposure to appropriate tensile stress; it was typically observed that if failure did not occur on loading, then the SiC specimens most often did not creep-rupture. However, creep-stress exponents for the SiC were determined to be 57, 27, and 11 for 1038, 1150, and 1350°C, respectively. For SiC, the fatigue-stress exponents did not correlate as well with creep-stress exponents. Failures that occurred in the SiC were a result of slow crack growth that was initiated from the specimen’s surface.


2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 164-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Hino ◽  
Yinsheng He ◽  
Kejian Li ◽  
Jungchel Chang ◽  
Keesam Shin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document