scholarly journals Motor Evoked Potentials to Magnetic Stimulaiton of the Human Central Nervous System

1996 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
T. Matsuda ◽  
S. Ueno
2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. W. Hoffman ◽  
T. Oya ◽  
T. J. Carroll ◽  
A. G. Cresswell

Studying the responsiveness of specific central nervous system pathways to electrical or magnetic stimulation can provide important information regarding fatigue processes in the central nervous system. We investigated the changes in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal contraction of the triceps surae. Comparisons were made between the size of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by motor cortical stimulation and cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited by magnetic stimulation of the descending tracts to determine the site of any change in corticospinal responsiveness. Participants maintained an isometric contraction of triceps surae at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for as long as possible on two occasions. Stimulation was applied to the motor cortex or the cervicomedullary junction at 1-min intervals during contraction until task failure. Peripheral nerve stimulation was also applied to evoke maximal M waves (Mmax) and a superimposed twitch. Additionally, MEPs and CMEPs were evoked during brief contractions at 80%, 90%, and 100% of MVC as a nonfatigue control. During the sustained contractions, MEP amplitude increased significantly in soleus (113%) and medial gastrocnemius (108%) muscles and, at task failure, matched MEP amplitude in the prefatigue MVC (∼20–25% Mmax). In contrast, CMEP amplitude increased significantly in medial gastrocnemius (51%), but not in soleus (63%) muscle and, at task failure, was significantly smaller than during prefatigue MVC (5–6% Mmax vs. 11–13% Mmax). The data indicate that cortical processes contribute substantially to the increase in corticospinal responsiveness during sustained submaximal contraction of triceps surae.


1993 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
JoaquimP. Brasil-Neto ◽  
Alvaro Pascual-Leone ◽  
Josep Valls-Sol� ◽  
Angel Cammarota ◽  
LeonardoG. Cohen ◽  
...  

1968 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raoul DiPerri ◽  
Anant Dravid ◽  
Arlene Schweigerdt ◽  
Harold E. Himwich

Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hampson

Organizational and activational effects of sex steroids were first discovered in laboratory animals, but these concepts extend to hormonal actions in the human central nervous system. This chapter begins with a brief overview of how sex steroids act in the brain and how the organizational-activational hypothesis originated in the field of endocrinology. It then reviews common methods used to study these effects in humans. Interestingly, certain cognitive functions appear to be subject to modification by sex steroids, and these endocrine influences may help explain the sex differences often seen in these functions. The chapter considers spatial cognition as a representative example because the spatial family of functions has received the most study by researchers interested in the biological roots of sex differences in cognition. The chapter reviews evidence that supports an influence of both androgens and estrogens on spatial functions, and concludes with a glimpse of where the field is headed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document