Immediate and long-term results of the first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. Final analysis of randomized study

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
S.A. Lyalkin ◽  
◽  
L.A. Syvak ◽  
N.O. Verevkina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Group 1

The objective: was to evaluate the efficacy of the first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Materials and methods. Open randomized study was performed including 122 patients with metastatic TNBC. The efficacy and safety of the first line chemotherapy of regimens АТ (n=59) – group 1, patients received doxorubicine 60 мг/м2 and paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and ТР (n=63) – group 2, patients received paclitaxel 175 мг/м2 and carboplatin AUC 5 were evaluated. Results. The median duration of response was 9.5 months (4.5–13.25 months) in patients received AT regimen and 8.5 months (4.7–12.25 months), in TP regimen; no statistically significant differences were observed, р=0.836. The median progression free survival was 7 months (95% CI 5–26 months) in group 1 and 7.5 months (95% CI 6–35 months) in group 2, p=0.85. Both chemotherapy regimens (AT and TP) had mild or moderate toxicity profiles (grade 1 or 2 in most patients). No significant difference in gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was higher in patients of group 2 (TP regimen): 42.8% versus 27% (р<0.05). Conclusions. Both regimens of chemotherapy (AT and TP) are appropriate to use in the first line setting in patients with metastatic TNBC. Key words: metastatic triple negative breast cancer, chemotherapy, progression free survival, chemotherapy toxicity.

Impact of androgen receptor on chemotherapy efficacy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 80-84
Author(s):  
S.A. Lyalkin ◽  
◽  
L.A. Syvak ◽  
N.O. Verevkina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

The objective: was to determine the impact of androgen receptor (AR) expression on the effectiveness of the first and second line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Materials and methods. The impact of AR expression on treatment results was evaluated in patients with mTNBC received the first (n=122) and second (n=87) line chemotherapy in open randomized studies. The status of AR was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, AR positive patients were defined as having AR more than 10%. Results. From 116 patients with mTBNC 44 (38%) were AR positive, 72 (62%) – AR negative. Median progression free survival in patients received the first line chemotherapy was 8 months in AR positive and 6 months in AR negative, p=0.27. The incidence of objective tumor response in mTNBC patients received the second line chemotherapy was 71.1% in AR negative and 76.92% in AR positive, p=0.48. Median progression free survival in patients received the second line chemotherapy was 6 months in AR positive and 4 months in AR negative, p=0.0045. Median overall survival in AR positive patients was statistically significantly higher (12 months versus 9 months, р=0.04). Conclusions. Impact of AR expression on progression free and overall survival was proved for mTNBC patients received the second line chemotherapy. Keywords: metastatic triple negative breast cancer, androgen receptor, chemotherapy, progression free survival, overall survival.

scholarly journals Relationship About KI67 and Chemotherapy Regimens About Progression Free Survival in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Guzmán-Casta Jordi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Objective: To determine the experience in a public institution (Hospital General de México) the relationship of KI67% and chemotherapy regimens about the progression free survival. Design: It is a retrospective study in which a total of 64 patients with a 36-month follow-up were evaluated, evaluating the percentage of KI67 and the chemotherapy regimens, which were AC+TXL vs CBP/TXL+AC. Results: A progression-free survival of 11.9 months was demonstrated in the patients who started with the CBP / TXL-based chemotherapy regimen and sequentially AC versus the 9.7 months achieved with the conventional ACX4 scheme and later add Carboplatin and Paclitaxel, and a Overall in both arms of 10.8 months, the patients who demonstrated the presence of a higher KI67 demonstrated increased progression-free survival compared to those with a low KI67, and with an unexpected surrogate that despite being few patients, those who showed higher levels of Progesterone had a lower survival compared to percentages of 5% or negative. Conclusions: Despite the fact that the first-line scheme for triple negative breast cancer was sequential and that the sample was only 64 patients, it was shown that adding carboplatin in the first line together with Paclitaxel in patients with high KI67 and without or with a minimal percentage of progresterone receptors increases Progression Free Survival.

Phase III Trial of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel Compared With Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Trial AB01

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8322-8330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Langley ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
Alison L. Jones ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (except for adjuvant therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either EP (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2) or EC (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary outcome was progression-free survival; secondary outcome measures were overall survival, response rates, and toxicity. Results Between 1996 and 1999, 705 patients (353 EP patients and 352 EC patients) underwent random assignment. Patient characteristics were well matched between the two groups, and 71% of patients received six cycles of treatment. Objective response rates were 65% for the EP group and 55% for the EC group (P = .015). At the time of analysis, 641 patients (91%) had died. Median progression-free survival time was 7.0 months for the EP group and 7.1 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = .41), and median overall survival time was 13 months for the EP group and 14 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19; P = .8). EP patients, compared with EC patients, had more grade 3 and 4 mucositis (6% v 2%, respectively; P = .0006) and grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity (5% v 1%, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion In terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, there was no evidence of a difference between EP and EC. The data demonstrate no additional advantage to using EP instead of EC as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in taxane-naïve patients.

Phase 3 clinical Trial Evaluating 90y glass microspheres in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver who have failed first-line chemotherapy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 474-474
Author(s):  
Maria Angela Karpf
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Glass Microspheres ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

474 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the US. Half of pts diagnosed with CRC develop liver disease. Unresectable liver metastases are responsible for morbidity/mortality. Typically, pts with metastatic CRC receive an oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based regimen as first-line chemotherapy, +/- bevacizumab. On progression, pts are treated with the regimen they did not receive during first-line chemo. A study to evaluate yttrium 90 glass microspheres (TheraSphere; 90Y) in pts with unresectable mCRC of the liver showed that pts with good performance status, no extrahepatic metastases, and ≤ 25% tumor may benefit most from 90Y. 90Y glass microspheres are approved by FDA under a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE). This study will evaluate outcomes in this patient subset when 90Y is added to second-line SOC chemo. The objective is to evaluate efficacy/safety of 90Y in patients with liver mCRC that has progressed after first-line chemo. Methods: Open-label, multi-center, randomized study to evaluate 90Y treatment in ~340 eligible pts, in whom SOC 2nd-line chemo with either an oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based regimen is planned. Eligible pts will be randomized 1:1 to control or treatment. Treatment pts will receive a first cycle of second-line chemo within 21 days of randomization and at least 14 days after the last dose of first-line agents including VEGF inhibitors. 90Y will be administered in place of the second chemotherapy cycle. Control pts will receive planned SOC second-line chemo. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary: overall survival, hepatic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, tumor response rate, and adverse events. Pts will have regular study visits as long as they participate, at which time safety/efficacy data will be collected and recorded. Results: NA Conclusions: Given the potential benefit to mCRC pts, this Phase 3 study will evaluate 90Y in the second-line setting in patients who have progressed following SOC first-line chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01483027.

Metaplastic progression free survival compared to triple negative breast cancer, a retrospective analysis.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12552-e12552
Author(s):  
Maryam B. Lustberg ◽  
Amanda Luff ◽  
Gregory S. Young ◽  
Rachel M. Layman ◽  
Ewa Mrozek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

scholarly journals Real-world effectiveness outcomes in patients diagnosed with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E Skinner ◽  
Amin Haiderali ◽  
Min Huang ◽  
Lee S Schwartzberg
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Community Oncology

Aim: This study examined treatment patterns and effectiveness outcomes of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) from US community oncology centers. Materials & methods: Eligible patients were females, aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with mTNBC between 1 January 2010 and 31 January 2016. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used. Results: Sample comprised 608 patients with average age of 57.5 years and 505/608 patients (83.1%) received systemic treatment. Overall survival (OS) from first-line treatment found that African–American patients had shorter OS than White (9.3 vs 13.7 months; hazard ratio: 1.35; p = 0.006). Conclusion: More than 15% of women with mTNBC were not treated, indicating a high unmet need. Overall prognosis remains poor, which highlights the opportunity for newer therapies to improve progression-free survival and OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document