scholarly journals Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Ventilated Patients: A Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Pina ◽  
Madalena Canellas ◽  
Rita Prazeres ◽  
José Lopes ◽  
Tânia Marcelino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Ventilated Patients

ABSTRACT Objectives: to map the benefits of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in ventilated adults in Intensive Care Unit and identify strategies used. Methods: a Scoping Review was carried out according to the Joanna Brigs Institute Protocol. The research question was: “In adult patients ventilated in Intensive Care Units, what are the benefits of Augmentative and Alternative Communication?”. An article research was carried out at PubMed, EBSCOhost and B-On databases. It was held between October and November 2018, from 2013 to 2018, in Portuguese and in English. Results: 61 references were obtained. After selection according to the inclusion criteria, 7 articles were analyzed. Conclusions: studies enunciate Augmentative and Alternative Communication as a strategy to enhance communication, describing methods and tools. There is no agreement on the most effective tool.

Perceptions of intensive care unit nurses of therapeutic futility: A scoping review

2020 ◽  
pp. 147775092093037
Author(s):  
João V. Vieira ◽  
Sérgio Deodato ◽  
Felismina Mendes
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Moral Conflicts ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Nurses Perceptions

Introduction Intensive care units are contexts in which, due to the remarkable existence of particularly technological resources, interventions are promoted to extend the life of people who experience highly complex health situations. This ability can lead to a culture of death denial where the possibility of implementing futile care and treatment cannot be excluded. Objective To describe nurses’ perceptions of adult intensive care units regarding the therapeutic futility of interventions implemented to persons in critical health conditions. Method Review of the literature following the Scoping Review protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The Population, Concept, and Context mnemonic was used to elaborate the research question and the research was performed using the EBSCOHost search engine in the CINAHL Complete databases, MEDLINE Complete, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify studies published between 1990 and 2019. Seven studies were selected. Results Nurses consider that therapeutic futility, a current problem in adult intensive care units, may have a negative impact on persons in critical health conditions and that contributes directly to resource expenditure and moral conflicts and consequently leads to emotional exhaustion. Conclusion Due to the complexity of this concept, knowing and understanding people’s and families’ perceptions is crucial to the decision-making process, for which reason nurses can play a key role in managing these situations.

Some more parameters of utilization of intensive care units in Hungary

2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (45) ◽  
pp. 1813-1817
Author(s):  
Miklós Gresz
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Institutional Level ◽  
National Network ◽  
Direct Discharge ◽  
Ventilated Patients

According to the “Semmelweis plan for saving health care”, „the capacity of the national network of intensive care units in Hungary is one but not the only bottleneck of emergency care at present”. In an earlier report the author showed, on the basis of data reported to the health insurance that not in a single calendar day more than 75% of beds in intensive care units were occupied. There were about 15 to 20 thousand sick days which could be considered unnecessary, because patients occupying these beds were discharged to their homes directly from the intensive care unit. This study examines the functioning of intensive care units partly at the institutional level. The author shows how the number of days using mechanical ventilation and the number of direct discharges to the home of patients have changed, and proves that those institutions where the proportion of direct discharge to home so overnursing of patients was high, the rate of mechanically ventilated patients was low. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 1813–1817.

Comparison of Ketamine- Versus Nonketamine-Based Sedation on Delirium and Coma in the Intensive Care Unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 536-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Shurtleff ◽  
John J. Radosevich ◽  
Asad E. Patanwala
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
The United States ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Background: At this time, there are no studies evaluating the risk of delirium or coma with the use of ketamine in mechanically ventilated adult patients, compared to conventional therapies such as propofol or dexmedetomidine. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the number of days alive without delirium or coma in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit receiving analgosedation infusions with ketamine versus without ketamine. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center in the United States. Consecutive mechanically ventilated adult patients between November 2015 and April 2017 were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the sedative regimen used: ketamine based or nonketamine based. The primary outcome was the number of days alive without delirium or coma. The secondary outcomes were incidence of delirium, incidence of coma, and ventilator-free days at day 28. Results: The study cohort consisted of 79 patients, of which 39 received ketamine- and 40 received nonketamine-based sedation. The number of days alive without delirium or coma was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-9 days) with ketamine and 4 days (IQR: 3-7 days) with nonketamine ( P = .351). Delirium occurred in 29 (74%) of 39 patients with ketamine and 34 (85%) of 40 patients with nonketamine ( P = .274). Coma occurred in 16 (41%) of 39 patients with ketamine and 6 (15%) of 40 patients with nonketamine ( P = .013). The median ventilator-free days were 13 days (IQR: 0-23 days) with ketamine and 21 days (0-25 days) with nonketamine ( P = .229). Conclusions: Sustained ketamine-based sedation in mechanically ventilated patients may be associated with a higher rate of observed coma but similar delirium- and coma-free days compared nonketamine-based regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document