scholarly journals An Analysis of the Risk Communication Structure to Resolve Nuclear Power-Policy Conflicts：Focused on a comparative analysis of perception structures between residents around a nuclear power plant and ordinary people through the application of S-M-C-R-E Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
김원제 ◽  
조항민 ◽  
이창주
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Risk Communication ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Ordinary People ◽  
Communication Structure

Comparative analysis of birth defects in regions of nuclear power plant locations

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 424-430
Author(s):  
N. S. Demikova ◽  
E. K. Khandogina ◽  
L. M. Vorobeva ◽  
N. A. Fedotova ◽  
B. A. Kobrinskii
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Nuclear Power

Nuclear power debate and public opinion in Belarus: From Chernobyl to Ostrovets

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliaksandr Novikau
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Risk Communication ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Nuclear Energy ◽  
Traumatic Event ◽  
Nuclear Accident ◽  
Positive View ◽  
The City

The Belarusian government’s decision of the last decade to build a nuclear power plant near the city of Ostrovets, in northern Belarus, has proven to be controversial, resulting in a great deal of debate about nuclear energy in the country. The debate was inevitably shaped by the traumatic event that affected Belarus – the Chernobyl nuclear accident of 1986. The Belarusian authorities have consistently promoted a positive view of nuclear energy to the population in order to overcome the so-called ‘Chernobyl syndrome’ and deliberately shaped nuclear risk communication. As a result, the issue of trust remains crucial in all nuclear debates in Belarus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document