scholarly journals The Use of Navigation In Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS)

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Abdulrazzaq Alobaid ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

scholarly journals Is 2D Fluoroscopy Reliable in Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery? Evaluation of Perforation Indices in MIS-TLIF

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Mohit Kumar Meena ◽  
Vishal G Kundnani ◽  
Ankit Patel ◽  
Sanyam Jain ◽  
Jwalant Y Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

Role of Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery Techniques in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanwaljeet Garg ◽  
Deepak Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

AbstractThoracolumbar burst fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures seen. Management options vary from nonoperative to operative. Among the operative approaches, minimal invasive approaches are gaining popularity. However, all the cases are not suitable for minimal invasive approaches. We discuss the various minimal invasive approaches and their role in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Minimal-invasive lumbale Wirbelsäulenchirurgie: historischer Rückblick, aktueller Stand und Ausblick

Praxis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (22) ◽  
pp. 1323-1329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver P. Gautschi ◽  
Martin N. Stienen ◽  
Marco V. Corniola ◽  
Karl Schaller
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Perioperativer Blutverlust ◽  
Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

Die lumbale Wirbelsäulenchirurgie ist seit Jahrzehnten von sogenannten «offenen dorsalen Zugängen» geprägt, die – obwohl etabliert – mit z.T. erheblichen Kollateralschäden im Bereich des operativen Zugangsweges assoziiert sind. Seit über zehn Jahren gibt es zunehmend minimal-invasive spinale Operationsmethoden (minimal invasive spine surgery, MISS), die deutlich weniger destruktiv und weniger traumatisch sind. Zu den Vorteilen zählen unteren anderem kleinere Hautinzisionen, geringeres Weichteil- und Muskeltrauma, geringerer perioperativer Blutverlust, erniedrigte Infektionsrate, raschere Mobilisierung, kürzerer Spitalaufenthalt und raschere postoperative Arbeitsfähigkeit. Diese Vorteile müssen jedoch gegenüber potenziellen Nachteilen abgewogen werden, zu welchen unter anderem eine erschwerte Orientierung für den Chirurgen, steilere Lernkurve sowie eine vermehrte Strahlenbelastung gehören. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Evolution und die aktuellen Möglichkeiten der MISS.

Efficacy of 2-Octylcyanoacrylate Glue in Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Jeong Yang ◽  
Sang-A Choi ◽  
Hee-Ju Lee ◽  
Eun-Ah Song ◽  
Sae-Moon Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

scholarly journals Smart Device Based Application for Rod Determination in Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

10.29007/cb4k ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Alk ◽  
Tobias Martin ◽  
Josef Kozak
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
Smart Device ◽  
Test Scenario ◽  
Traumatic Injuries ◽  
Position Data ◽  
Best Fitting ◽  
Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

In orthopaedic spine surgery pedicle screw systems are used for stabilisation of the spine after injuries or disorders. With an percutaneous operation method surgeons are faced with huge challenges compared to an open surgery, but it`s less traumatic and the patient benefits with a faster rehabilitation and less traumatic injuries. The screw positions and the required rod dimensions for the stabilizing connection between the screws are hard to define without an open view on the operating field. Because of these facts a new smart device based system for rod shape determination was invented. Therefore, an application was developed, which integrates a localizer module to get the position data of the pedicle screws, with help of rigid bodies placed on top of the pedicle screws down-tubes. An algorithm was developed to choose the best fitting rod to connect the pedicle screws with help of calculating the rod length and the rod radius. The system was tested in a test scenario where four pedicle screws were drilled into a wooden plate. The positions of the screws were adjusted to fit a curved and a straight rod. In the test scenario the application chose always the rod correctly.

Minimal invasive spine surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1219
Author(s):  
Jayesh Sardhara ◽  
Sudhir Dube
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery

scholarly journals MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE SURGERY IN THE NUEVO HOSPITAL CIVIL DE GUADALAJARA "DR. JUAN I. MENCHACA"

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-271
Author(s):  
MIGUEL ÁNGEL ANDRADE-RAMOS ◽  
YAZMÍN LEMUS-RODRÍGUEZ ◽  
EDGAR FERNANDO ACOSTA-GÓMEZ ◽  
SERGIO VALENTE ESPARZA-GUTIÉRREZ ◽  
FRANCISCO GUERRERO-JAZO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Adjacent Structures

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe our experience on a case series treated with minimal invasive techniques in spine surgery, with short-term follow-up and identify complications. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed on 116 patients operated on by the same team from September 2015 to June 2016. Evaluating the short-term follow-up we registered the surgical time, bleeding, complications, hospital stay, pre- and postoperatively neurological status, as well as scales of disability and quality of life. Demographic and surgical procedure data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 program. Results: A total of 116 patients with a mean age of 49.7 + 15.7 (21-85 years) underwent surgery being 76 (65%) with lumbar conditions and 37 (32%) with cervical conditions. The most common procedures were tubular discectomies (31), tubular bilateral decompression (17), lumbar MI-TLIFs (7), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (35). The mean blood loss was 50.6 cc, the hospital stay was 1.7 day, pre- and postoperative pain VAS were 7.4 % and 2.3%, respectively, pre- and postoperative Oswestry (ODI) were 64.6% and 13.1%, respectively, pre- and postoperative SF-36 of 37.8% and 90.3%. There were no major complications, except for a surgical wound infection in diabetic patient and three incidental durotomies, one of these being a contained fistula, treated conservatively. Conclusions: The current tendency towards minimally invasive surgery has been justified on multiple studies in neoplastic and degenerative diseases, with the preservation of the structures that support the spine biomechanics. The benefits should not replace the primary objectives of surgery and its usefulness depends on the skills of the surgeon, pathology and the adequate selection of the techniques. We found that the tubular access allows developing techniques such as discectomy, corpectomy and fusion without limiting exposure, avoiding manipulation of adjacent structures, reducing complications and being feasible in a public hospital.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document