scholarly journals Exploratory Study on the Psychological Impact of COVD-19 on Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeeshan Ahmad Bhutta ◽  
Muhammad Fakhar-e-Alam Kulyar ◽  
Muhammad Shoaib ◽  
Wangyuan Yao ◽  
Muhammad Asif ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M.M. Oonk ◽  
S. Ariens ◽  
H.P.M. Kunst ◽  
R.J.C. Admiraal ◽  
H. Kremer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dr. A Anandhi ◽  
Dr. Lakshmipriya K ◽  
Dr. Ponnuraja C ◽  
Padmanaban S ◽  
Dr. Adhin Bhaskar

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 485-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Bennett ◽  
Brett T. Litz ◽  
Shira Maguen ◽  
Jill T. Ehrenreich

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Arthur ◽  
Tessa Watts ◽  
Ruth Davies ◽  
Vinaya Manchaiah ◽  
Julie Slater

A then-test technique was used to investigate the possibility of a response shift in the Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile (GHABP). Following completion of part 1 of the GHABP, 16 adults were invited for hearing-aid follow up appointments. In accordance with then-test technique, participants were asked to think back to before they had their hearing-aids fitted and the GHABP part 1 was completed again to re-establish the disability and handicap scores. These scores were then compared with the initial GHABP part I scores. Paired T testing and Wilcoxon Rank tests were carried out to investigate the statistical significance of the response shift effect. Statistically significant differences were seen between initial and retrospective GHABP (disability) scores using t test. No significant differences could be seen between the initial and retrospective handicap scores. Results suggest participants may have demonstrated a possible response shift phenomenon with the disability construct of the GHABP questionnaire, related to a possible re-calibration effect or a denial of disability effect. This exploratory study suggests that the GHABP questionnaire may be subject to a response shift phenomena. We suggest that further more robust studies are completed to verify this and recommend that this could have psychological impact on participants when explaining the results of the outcome measure and may affect hearing aid use. There is also potential for this phenomenon to affect global GHABP scores specifically when demonstrating to stakeholders the overall success of an audiology service.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-130
Author(s):  
Raúl Rojas ◽  
Farzan Irani

Purpose This exploratory study examined the language skills and the type and frequency of disfluencies in the spoken narrative production of Spanish–English bilingual children who do not stutter. Method A cross-sectional sample of 29 bilingual students (16 boys and 13 girls) enrolled in grades prekindergarten through Grade 4 produced a total of 58 narrative retell language samples in English and Spanish. Key outcome measures in each language included the percentage of normal (%ND) and stuttering-like (%SLD) disfluencies, percentage of words in mazes (%MzWds), number of total words, number of different words, and mean length of utterance in words. Results Cross-linguistic, pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences with medium effect sizes for %ND and %MzWds (both lower for English) as well as for number of different words (lower for Spanish). On average, the total percentage of mazed words was higher than 10% in both languages, a pattern driven primarily by %ND; %SLDs were below 1% in both languages. Multiple linear regression models for %ND and %SLD in each language indicated that %MzWds was the primary predictor across languages beyond other language measures and demographic variables. Conclusions The findings extend the evidence base with regard to the frequency and type of disfluencies that can be expected in bilingual children who do not stutter in grades prekindergarten to Grade 4. The data indicate that %MzWds and %ND can similarly index the normal disfluencies of bilingual children during narrative production. The potential clinical implications of the findings from this study are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document