scholarly journals Effects of manual therapy techniques in the treatment of pain in post mastectomy patients: systematic review.

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
Franciane Batista Basilio ◽  
Raphaela Medeiros Miranda Anjos ◽  
Elany Pereira Medeiros ◽  
Elaine Marques Franco Melo ◽  
Rodrigo Marcel Valentim Silva
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Muscle Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Treatment Objective ◽  
External Causes

Introduction: Cancer is now the third leading cause of death in the world, surpassed only by accidents and cardiovascular deaths by external causes, among them stands mammary carcinoma. Mastectomy is in a procedure consisting of invasive breast removal due to some anatomical and functional changes previously diagnosed. With the growth of the disease and its high content in increasingly young women, Manual Therapy has been used as a new form of treatment. Objective: To show the effects of manual therapy in patients after mastectomy surgery. Method: This was a systematic review study in which secondary and tertiary sources were used, using the databases PubMed, Medline, Lilacs and SciELO. It was adopted as inclusion criteria studies classified as: a randomized controlled trial, with publication period between 2009 and 2013. Were used as search terms: "Mastectomy", "Neck", "Shoulder Pain", "Musculoskeletal Manipulations" and "Functionality". Results: Among the 37 initially selected by electronic search in the databases of articles, 25 were excluded for the title did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the 12 retained studies, 5 were excluded for duplicity. 7 studies were selected for a more thorough analysis through summary, 2 of them being excluded. The remaining 5 articles were evaluated from reading the text. It can be seen that the manual therapy techniques have significant results in the alleviation of muscle pain in patients submitted to surgery mastectomia. Conclusion: It can be seen that the manual therapy techniques have significant results in the alleviation of muscle pain in patients undergoing the mastectomy surgery. However, there is still a lack of studies of type randomized controlled trial on the effects of manual therapy in patients in the postoperative period of mastectomy

scholarly journals The The Effectiveness of Early Mobilization Time on Balance and Functional Ability after Ischemic Stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092
Author(s):  
Umi Budi Rahayu ◽  
Samekto Wibowo ◽  
Ismail Setyopranoto
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Ability ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Berg Balance Scale ◽  
Early Mobilisation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation (EM) after-ischemic stroke is a motor learning intervention aimed to restore nerve cells and to improve balance and functional ability. Unfortunately, the study of when this intervention began has not been widely studied. AIM: On this study was compared the effect of EM started at 24 hours and 48 hours after an ischemic stroke on balance and functional ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trial involving 40 patients on 2 groups meeting predefined inclusion criteria. The levels of balance were measured using the Berg Balance Scale, and the functional ability was measured using the Barthel Index, at 5th and 7th day. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in both balance (p = 0.038) and functional ability (p = 0.021) obtained on the 7th day of assessment between both groups. A significant difference on the 5th day was observed only in the functional ability (p = 0.002) and not in the balance (p = 0.147), between the groups. CONCLUSION: EM started at 24 hours after the ischemic stroke has been found to have a better impact on balance and functional ability compared to that at 48 hours.

scholarly journals Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6176
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kuligowski ◽  
Anna Skrzek ◽  
Błażej Cieślik
Keyword(s):  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Lumbar Radiculopathy ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

The aim of this study was to describe and update current knowledge of manual therapy accuracy in treating cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, to identify the limitations in current studies, and to suggest areas for future research. The study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science databases up to April 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) presence of radiculopathy; (2) treatment defined as manual therapy (i.e., traction, manipulation, mobilization); and (3) publication defined as a Randomized Controlled Trial. The electronic literature search resulted in 473 potentially relevant articles. Finally, 27 articles were accepted: 21 on cervical (CR) and 6 in lumbar radiculopathy (LR). The mean PEDro score for CR was 6.6 (SD 1.3), and for LR 6.7 (SD 1.6). Traction-oriented techniques are the most frequently chosen treatment form for CR and are efficient in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes. In LR, each of the included publications used a different form of manual therapy, which makes it challenging to summarize knowledge in this group. Of included publications, 93% were either of moderate or low quality, which indicates that quality improvement is necessary for this type of research.

scholarly journals Manual therapy compared with physical therapy in patients with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruud Groeneweg ◽  
Luite van Assen ◽  
Hans Kropman ◽  
Huco Leopold ◽  
Jan Mulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Talus mobilization-based manual therapy is effective for restoring range of motion and enhancing balance in older adults with limited ankle mobility: A randomized controlled trial.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hernández-Guillén ◽  
Sergio Roig-Casasús ◽  
Catalina Tolsada-Velasco ◽  
PT Carmen García-Gomáriz ◽  
José-María Blasco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Ankle Mobility

Biomedical conferences’ author instructions rarely mention guidelines for reporting abstracts of trials and systematic reviews

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-91
Author(s):  
Lenko Saric ◽  
Svjetlana Dosenovic ◽  
Jakov Mihanovic ◽  
Livia Puljak
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Reporting Guidelines ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

Aim: To analyze whether instructions for authors of biomedical conference abstracts mention guidelines for writing randomized controlled trial and systematic review abstracts and to evaluate reasons for their absence from instructions. Materials & methods: We analyzed instructions for authors of biomedical conferences advertized in 2019 and assessed whether they mentioned Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Abstracts and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts guidelines. We surveyed contact persons from abstract/publication committees of selected conferences to analyze why relevant guidelines were missing. Results: Instructions for abstracts were available for 819 conferences. Only two (0.2%) had reporting instructions for randomized controlled trial/systematic review authors. Almost half of the contacted conference organizers whose response we received were not aware of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Abstracts and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts guidelines. Conclusion: Conference organizers do not require and are not familiar enough with reporting guidelines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document