scholarly journals Criminal procedure policy and criminal procedure law. Part 2

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-166
Author(s):  
V S Shadrin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Key Aspects

Тhe author examines the concept, importance and key aspects of penal policy, as an integral part of the criminal policy of the state. Explains the meaning of penal policy and its role in shaping modern criminal procedure law.

scholarly journals Criminal procedure policy and criminal procedure law

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-165
Author(s):  
V S Shadrin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Penal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Key Aspects

The author examines the concept, importance and key aspects of penal policy, as an integral part of the criminal policy of the state. Explains the meaning of penal policy and its role in shaping modern criminal procedure law.

scholarly journals Modern trends of development criminal procedure legislation in the light of a fair criminal policy of the state

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-173
Author(s):  
A A Timoshenko
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Objective Truth ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

In the article the author considers the problems of reforming the criminal procedure legislation in Russia and relates them to the criminal policy of the state. Special attention is given to such bills as the concepts of objective truth and the investigating judge, as well as issues of humanization of the criminal procedure law.

scholarly journals RETURNS OF ASSETS IN CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS AS ALTERNATIVE RESTORING STATE LOSSES

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Komang Ekayana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Recovery Model ◽  
Formal Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Asset Recovery ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law

Corrupted state assets certainly hurt the country narrowly, but also broadly where it harms the country and its people. However, the formal approach through the current criminal procedure law has not been able to recover the losses suffered by the state. In fact, state losses resulting from corruption are state assets that must be saved. Then there needs to be a new breakthrough to recover state losses through the asset recovery model. When looking at the country from the perspective of the victims, the state must obtain protection, in this case recovery from the losses suffered due to corruption. This paper examines the model of returning assets resulting from corruption in the law enforcement process that focuses on the rule of law in the 2003 UNCAC Convention and the mechanism of returning state assets in terms of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. 

scholarly journals Dialectical analysis of amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China in 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-400
Author(s):  
Haiqing Peng ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Fast Track ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Standing Committee ◽  
Supervisory System ◽  
Effective Performance ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Dialectical Analysis ◽  
People's Congress

The amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law in China in 2018 mainly involves enhancing the system for leniency based on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment, increasing the procedure of fast-track sentencing, improving the convergence norm between the Criminal Procedure Law and the Supervision Law, and adding the procedure for trial in absentia. These improvements and additions have positive implications for the implementation of a criminal policy of leniency and strictness, for realization of the diversion of complex situations and simple situations in the proceedings, for deepening the reform of the state’s supervisory system, for realizing the people’s procuratorate’s effective performance of legal supervision, and power and for effectively punishing crimes of corruption. However, there are limitations in the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018. In the future, the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law can adopt both the comprehensive amendment of the National People’s Congress and the partial amendment of its Standing Committee, so as to promote the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in a timely and comprehensive manner. In terms of the amendment’s content, the judicial reform results and coordination between laws should be fully considered. New regulations for the new law should be clear and enforceable. In regard to law implementation, there should be sufficient time for implementation preparation after the promulgation of the new law.

scholarly journals PERANAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM MENURUT KUHAP

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Bastianto Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Examination Process

The trial of a criminal case is to find out whether a criminal offense has occurred in an event, therefore in the most important criminal proceedings the proceedings are proved. Evidence is a problem that plays a role in the examination process in court because with this proof is determined the fate of a defendant. The legal function in the State of Indonesia is to regulate the order of society in the life of the nation and the state, whereas the violation of the law itself is an event that must exist in every society and is impossible to be eliminated absolutely, because violation of law is an integral part of development More complex. One of the provisions governing how the law enforcement officers carry out the task in the field of repressive is the criminal procedure law which has the purpose of searching and approaching material truth, the complete truth of a criminal case by applying the provisions of criminal procedure law honestly darn precisely with The purpose of finding out who the perpetrator can be charged with is a violation of the law. 

scholarly journals The evil and crime: moral and legal dimension

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-241
Author(s):  
A D Kerimov ◽  
E V Halipova
Keyword(s):  
Moral Responsibility ◽  
Intrinsic Value ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
State Of Affairs ◽  
Unlawful Conduct ◽  
Good And Evil

The article, in fact, a response to the ideas contained in the monograph A.I.Aleksandrova "evil philosophy and the philosophy of Crime (questions of philosophy of law, criminal policy and criminal procedure)." Readers are invited to meditation, inspired by philosophical and legal views A.I.Aleksandrova on such fundamental issues as the understanding and the ratio of good and evil crimes and atrocities, socially approved, lawful and unlawful conduct, political and moral responsibility of the government of the state of affairs in the field of the fight against crime, the intrinsic value of education, education and education not only youth, but also all citizens of the state of organized society, and others.

scholarly journals Basics of Criminal Policy: from Theoretical Discourse to De Lege Ferеnda

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-650
Author(s):  
Аlla Endoltseva ◽  
Yulia Endoltseva ◽  
Natalya Platonova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
State Level ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Common Goal ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Policy Study ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation

The authors analyze publications in criminal policy, study its understanding by scholars of criminal and criminal procedure law and criminology, and present their own vision of different aspects of the development and implementation of criminal policy in the Russian Federation. They examine criminal policy as a complex pheno­menon which has law enforcement and human rights dimensions aimed at counteracting crime, as a system which includes criminal law, criminal procedure, investigation, penitentiary and criminological policies; the authors present arguments in favor of using such an approach. Criminal policy cannot be designed independently from state legal policy; it should be developed with the participation of civil society institutions and should be approved by it. The main goal of this work is to determine the basics (the principles) of Russian criminal policy, to describe their contents, interconnections and interpenetration. The authors examine and analyze different approaches to specifying the principles of criminal policy. They come to the conclusion that the principles of criminal policy differ from the principles of anti-criminal branches of law, but the latter should determine the basic clauses of criminal and criminal procedure law. It is stressed that a system of principles focusing on a common goal — crime counteraction — can only be discussed within the framework of criminal policy. The authors study the international experience of criminal policy in different countries and determine four fundamental principles of criminal policy in the member states of the Council of Europe. The analysis of modern criminal law and criminal procedure legislation with its numerous changes and amendments, the identified lack of coordination and inconsistency of the actions of lawmakers allow the authors to discuss the necessity of developing a unified criminal law, criminal procedure and penitentiary policy, i.e. criminal policy in a broad sense. They conclude that it is necessary to design a document, officially recognized at the state level, that would stipulate and reflect the basics (the principles), goals and tasks, as well as the priority directions for developing the criminal policy.

Features of the activities of criminal Executive inspections at the stage of execution of the sentence: problems and prospects

2019 ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
Вячеслав Борисович Шабанов ◽  
Людмила Юрьевна Буданова
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Support ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Scientific Understanding ◽  
The State ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Effective Operation ◽  
Criminal Penalties ◽  
Severe Type

Эффективность деятельности уголовно-исполнительных инспекций, а также достижение целей наказания во многом зависят от состояния законодательства, регламентирующего уголовно-процессуальные вопросы исполнения приговора. Вместе с тем имеется ряд проблемных аспектов, который требует научного осмысления и разрешения относительно правового и организационного обеспечения деятельности субъектов, вступающих в правоотношения на стадии исполнения приговора. На сегодняшний день в российском уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве некоторые вопросы, касающиеся стадии исполнения приговора, не урегулированы в удовлетворяющей науку и практику степени, к ним, в частности, следует отнести форму и содержание представлений указанных органов и учреждений, сроки назначения судебного заседания по разрешению вопросов, связанных с исполнением приговора. Указанное препятствует не только эффективной деятельности государственных органов и их должностных лиц, участвующих на стадии исполнения приговора, но и осуществлению уголовной политики государства в целом, реализации назначения уголовного судопроизводства и достижению целей головных наказаний. Так, в практической деятельности отмечается недостаточная эффективность функционирования уголовно-исполнительных инспекций в ряде регионов, не везде выполняются плановые и основные показатели их деятельности, в том числе в сфере уголовно-процессуальных правоотношений, возрастает количество предупреждений, выносимых уголовно-исполнительными инспекциями в связи с нарушением порядка и условий отбывания наказания осужденными, при этом снижается число удовлетворенных судом ходатайств о замене наказания более строгим его видом. The effectiveness of the activities of criminal executive inspections, as well as the achievement of the goals of punishment largely depend on the state of legislation regulating criminal procedural issues of execution of the sentence. At the same timethere are a number of problematic aspects that require scientific understanding and resolution regarding the legal and organizational support for the activities of entities entering into legal relations at the stage of execution of the sentence. Today in the Russian criminal procedure legislation some issues related to the stage of execution of the sentence, not resolved in a satisfying science and practice degrees to them, in particular, should include the form and content of submissions to these institutions, the terms of appointment of the hearing on the resolution of issues related to the execution of the sentence. This hinders not only the effective operation of their officials involved in the execution of the sentence, but also the implementation of the criminal policy of the state as a whole, the implementation of the appointment of criminal proceedings and the achievement of the goals of criminal penalties. Thus, in practice, there is a lack of efficiency in the functioning of criminal executive inspections in a number of regions, the planned and basic indicators of their activities are not always fulfilled, including in the sphere of criminal procedural legal relations, the number of warnings issued by criminal executive inspections in connection with the violation of the order and conditions of serving punishment by convicts is increasing, while the number of applications for the replacement of punishment by a more severe type of punishment satisfied by the court is decreasing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document