Source Rupture Process of the 2014 Ms 6.5 Ludian, Yunnan, China, Earthquake in 3D Structure: The Strain Green’s Tensor Database Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
pp. 3270-3277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Luo ◽  
Ming‐Che Hsieh ◽  
Li Zhao
Wave Motion ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Bedding ◽  
J.R. Willis

Geophysics ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Knopoff ◽  
Anthony F. Gangi

The reciprocity relationship describing the relations among the fields resulting from the interchange of point sources and receivers may be extended to the seismic case. Seismic reciprocity can be described either in terms of the scalar product of the vectors representing the excitation of the source and the field at the receiver, or in terms of a Green’s tensor describing these two quantities. Theoretical reciprocity relations give no information concerning reciprocity in the cases for which the scalar product vanishes. A simple experiment in the vector case demonstrates that reciprocity is not obtained when the scalar product of the two vectors vanishes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 158-171
Author(s):  
Sh. A. Dildabayev ◽  
G. K. Zakir'yanova

Geophysics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 1754-1759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter L. Anderson

A new method is presented that rapidly evaluates the many Green’s tensor integrals encountered in three‐dimensional electromagnetic modeling using an integral equation. Application of a fast Hankel transform (FHT) algorithm (Anderson, 1982) is the basis for the new solution, where efficient and accurate computation of Hankel transforms are obtained by related and lagged convolutions (linear digital filtering). The FHT algorithm is briefly reviewed and compared to earlier convolution algorithms written by the author. The homogeneous and layered half‐space cases for the Green’s tensor integrals are presented in a form so that the FHT can be easily applied in practice. Computer timing runs comparing the FHT to conventional direct convolution methods are discussed, where the FHT’s performance was about 6 times faster for a homogeneous half‐space, and about 108 times faster for a five‐layer half‐space. Subsequent interpolation after the FHT is called is required to compute specific values of the tensor integrals at selected transform arguments; however, due to the relatively small lagged convolution interval used (same as the digital filter’s), a simple and fast interpolation is sufficient (e.g., by cubic splines).


2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 1047-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Yokota ◽  
Yasuyuki Kawazoe ◽  
Sunhe Yun ◽  
Satoko Oki ◽  
Yosuke Aoki ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Alegret ◽  
Mikael Käll ◽  
Peter Johansson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document