Magnitude Estimation for Earthquake Early Warning with Multiple Parameter Inputs and a Support Vector Machine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingbao Zhu ◽  
Shanyou Li ◽  
Jindong Song
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Magnitude Estimation ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Multiple Parameter ◽  
Wave Arrival

Abstract Accurately estimating the magnitude within the initial seconds after the P-wave arrival is of great significance in earthquake early warning (EEW). Over the past few decades, single-parameter approaches such as the τc and Pd methods have been applied to EEW magnitude estimation studies considering the first 3 s after the P-wave onset. However, these methods present considerable scatter and are affected by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and epicentral distance. In this study, using Japanese K-NET strong-motion data, we propose a machine-learning method comprising multiple parameter inputs, namely, the support vector machine magnitude estimation (SVM-M) model, to determine earthquake magnitudes and resolve the aforementioned problems. Our results using a single seismological station record show that the standard deviation of the magnitude prediction errors of the SVM-M model is 0.297, which is less than those of the τc (1.637) and Pd (0.425) methods. The magnitudes estimated by the SVM-M model within 3 s after the P-wave arrival are not obviously affected by the SNR or epicentral distance, and not overestimated for MJMA≤5. In addition, in an offline EEW application, the magnitude estimation error of the SVM-M model gradually decreases with increasing time after the first station is triggered, and the underestimation of event magnitudes for 6.5≤MJMA gradually improves. These results demonstrate that the proposed SVM-M model can robustly estimate earthquake magnitudes and has potential for EEW.

scholarly journals Magnitude Estimation for Earthquake Early Warning Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingbao Zhu ◽  
Shanyou Li ◽  
Jindong Song ◽  
Yuan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Magnitude Estimation ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Deep Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Wave Arrival

Magnitude estimation is a vital task within earthquake early warning (EEW) systems (EEWSs). To improve the magnitude determination accuracy after P-wave arrival, we introduce an advanced magnitude prediction model that uses a deep convolutional neural network for earthquake magnitude estimation (DCNN-M). In this paper, we use the inland strong-motion data obtained from the Japan Kyoshin Network (K-NET) to calculate the input parameters of the DCNN-M model. The DCNN-M model uses 12 parameters extracted from 3 s of seismic data recorded after P-wave arrival as the input, four convolutional layers, four pooling layers, four batch normalization layers, three fully connected layers, the Adam optimizer, and an output. Our results show that the standard deviation of the magnitude estimation error of the DCNN-M model is 0.31, which is significantly less than the values of 1.56 and 0.42 for the τc method and Pd method, respectively. In addition, the magnitude prediction error of the DCNN-M model is not affected by variations in the epicentral distance. The DCNN-M model has considerable potential application in EEWSs in Japan.

A Comparison of Two Magnitude Estimation Methods Using Predominant Period in Earthquake Early Warning

2012 ◽  
Vol 256-259 ◽  
pp. 2193-2199
Author(s):  
Jin Dong Song ◽  
Shan You Li
Keyword(s):  
Magnitude Estimation ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Pass Filter ◽  
Low Pass Filter ◽  
Predominant Period ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Wave Arrival

Currently, there are two magnitude estimation approaches using predominant period for earthquake early warning, Tpmax method and Tc method. We compared Tpmax method with Tc method from the NSMP strong motion records of 22 earthquakes in United States with moment magnitude ranging from 4.1 to 7.9, to explore which method was with higher precision and could be suitable for the earthquake early warning system. Our results show that scaling relations between the two predominant period parameters, Tpmax and Tc, calculated from P-wave arrivals and earthquake magnitude are consistent with previous research. It was found that Tc method had higher precision than Tpmax method with the same filter band, and had best result in magnitude estimation resulting in a correlation coefficient of 0.78 and a standard deviation of 0.16 using 3 seconds signal after the P-wave arrival. We also found that Tc method without low-pass filter had higher accuracy than Tpmax method without low-pass filter. We recommended Tc method using 3 seconds signal after the P-wave arrival as the priority magnitude estimation method for earthquake early warning.

Practical Site-Specific Earthquake Early Warning Application

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhisa Kanda ◽  
◽  
Tadashi Nasu ◽  
Masamitsu Miyamura
Keyword(s):  
Early Warning ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Seismic Intensity ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Japan Meteorological Agency ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
Intensity Estimation ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Wide Range

Real-time hazard mitigation we have developed using earthquake early warning (EEW) (1) enhances seismic intensity estimation accuracy and (2) extends the interval between when an EEW is issued and when strong tremors arrive. We accomplished the first point (enhancing seismic intensity estimation) by reducing estimation error to less than that commonly used based on an attenuation relationship and soil amplification factor by considering source-location and wave propagation path differences based on site-specific empiricism. We accomplished the second point (shortening the time between warnings and when tremors arrive) using a high-speed, reliable communication network for receiving EEW information from the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) and quickly transmitting warning signals to users. In areas close to quake epicenters, however, warnings may not arrive before the arrival of strong ground motions. The on-site warning system we developed uses P-wave pickup sensors that detect P-wave arrival at a site and predict seismic intensity of subsequent S-waves. We confirmed the on-site warning prototype’s feasibility based on numerical simulation and observation. We also developed an integration server for combining on-site warnings with JMA information to be applied to earthquakes over a wide range of distances. We installed a practical prototype at a construction site near the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Inland Earthquake epicenter to measure its aftershocks because JMA EEW information was too late to use against the main shock. We obtained good aftershock results, confirming the prototype’s applicability and accuracy. Integration server combination logic was developed for manufacturing sites requiring highly robust, reliable control.

scholarly journals Earthquake Early Warning System for Structural Drift Prediction Using Machine Learning and Linear Regressors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Giovanni Iaccarino ◽  
Philippe Gueguen ◽  
Matteo Picozzi ◽  
Subash Ghimire
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Single Type ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Peak Displacement ◽  
Steel Reinforced Concrete

In this work, we explored the feasibility of predicting the structural drift from the first seconds of P-wave signals for On-site Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) applications. To this purpose, we investigated the performance of both linear least square regression (LSR) and four non-linear machine learning (ML) models: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines and K-Nearest Neighbors. Furthermore, we also explore the applicability of the models calibrated for a region to another one. The LSR and ML models are calibrated and validated using a dataset of ∼6,000 waveforms recorded within 34 Japanese structures with three different type of construction (steel, reinforced concrete, and steel-reinforced concrete), and a smaller one of data recorded at US buildings (69 buildings, 240 waveforms). As EEW information, we considered three P-wave parameters (the peak displacement, Pd, the integral of squared velocity, IV2, and displacement, ID2) using three time-windows (i.e., 1, 2, and 3 s), for a total of nine features to predict the drift ratio as structural response. The Japanese dataset is used to calibrate the LSR and ML models and to study their capability to predict the structural drift. We explored different subsets of the Japanese dataset (i.e., one building, one single type of construction, the entire dataset. We found that the variability of both ground motion and buildings response can affect the drift predictions robustness. In particular, the predictions accuracy worsens with the complexity of the dataset in terms of building and event variability. Our results show that ML techniques perform always better than LSR models, likely due to the complex connections between features and the natural non-linearity of the data. Furthermore, we show that by implementing a residuals analysis, the main sources of drift variability can be identified. Finally, the models trained on the Japanese dataset are applied the US dataset. In our application, we found that the exporting EEW models worsen the prediction variability, but also that by including correction terms as function of the magnitude can strongly mitigate such problem. In other words, our results show that the drift for US buildings can be predicted by minor tweaks to models.

scholarly journals P-wave picking for earthquake early warning: Refinement of a T pd method

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masumi Yamada ◽  
Jim Mori
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Arrival Time ◽  
Early Warning Systems ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Warning Systems ◽  
Wave Detection ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning Systems ◽  
Wave Arrival

Summary Detecting P-wave onsets for on-line processing is an important component for real-time seismology. As earthquake early warning systems around the world come into operation, the importance of reliable P-wave detection has increased, since the accuracy of the earthquake information depends primarily on the quality of the detection. In addition to the accuracy of arrival time determination, the robustness in the presence of noise and the speed of detection are important factors in the methods used for the earthquake early warning. In this paper, we tried to improve the P-wave detection method designed for real-time processing of continuous waveforms. We used the new Tpd method, and proposed a refinement algorithm to determine the P-wave arrival time. Applying the refinement process substantially decreases the errors of the P-wave arrival time. Using 606 strong motion records of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake sequence to test the refinement methods, the median of the error was decreased from 0.15 s to 0.04 s. Only three P-wave arrivals were missed by the best threshold. Our results show that the Tpd method provides better accuracy for estimating the P-wave arrival time compared to the STA/LTA method. The Tpd method also shows better performance in detecting the P-wave arrivals of the target earthquakes in the presence of noise and coda of previous earthquakes. The Tpd method can be computed quickly so it would be suitable for the implementation in earthquake early warning systems.

Station Correction of P-Alert Network to Improve Magnitude Estimation for Earthquake Early Warning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ting Wu ◽  
Yih-Min Wu
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Magnitude Estimation ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Latent Variables ◽  
Regression Method ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Station Correction ◽  
Hypocentral Distance ◽  
Station Corrections

<p>Magnitude estimation for earthquake early warning has been shown that it can be achieved by utilizing the relationship among the first three seconds P-wave amplitude, hypocentral distance and magnitude. However, the regression models in previous studies about P-Alert didn't include station correction factors, which may cause non-negligible effects. Thus, to improve the precision of magnitude estimation, we take station corrections into consideration when building the regression model. For the reason that station corrections are the unobserved latent variables of the model, we adopt the iteration regression method, which is based on the expectation-maximization algorithm, to determine them. By using this method, we are able to approach the values of both the station corrections and the coefficients of the regression model after several iterations. Our preliminary results show that after utilizing the iteration regression method, the standard deviation reduces from 0.30 to 0.26, and the station corrections we get range from -0.70 to 0.66.</p>

An Improved Magnitude Estimation Method Using Combination of Predominant Period and Peak Amplitude for Earthquake Early Warning

2012 ◽  
Vol 256-259 ◽  
pp. 2775-2780
Author(s):  
Jin Dong Song ◽  
Shan You Li
Keyword(s):  
Magnitude Estimation ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Peak Amplitude ◽  
Combined Method ◽  
Predominant Period ◽  
Great Magnitude

The critical technology of Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) is determining the size of an earthquake and the predicted ground motion at given site, from the first few seconds of the P wave arrivals. Currently, there were two different approaches to the EEW magnitude estimation, the predominant period method and the peak amplitude method. However, both methods mentioned above had some disadvantages, such as significant uncertainty and saturation at great magnitude. To improve the results of magnitude estimation, a combined method using predominant period τc and peak amplitude of acceleration Pmax was introduced. Compared with the predominant period method and the peak amplitude method, the estimation standard deviation level of the combined method is 0.42 using NSMP strong motion data. The magnitude estimation results of the first three seconds P wave indicate that, the estimation precision of combined method is higher than those of the two methods, the predominant period method and the peak amplitude method, and the saturation at great magnitude is improved.

Deep learning for P-wave arrival picking in earthquake early warning

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-402
Author(s):  
Wang Yanwei ◽  
Li Xiaojun ◽  
Wang Zifa ◽  
Shi Jianping ◽  
Bao Enhe
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Wave Arrival
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document