scholarly journals Cirrhosis aggravates the ninety-day mortality after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2869
Author(s):  
Hosam Farouk Abdelhameed ◽  
Ashraf M. El-Badry
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Background: Ninety-day postoperative mortality (90-D POM) measures accurately the liver resection-related mortality. In cirrhotic patients, reporting post-hepatectomy-related death only as in-hospital or thirty-day postoperative mortality (30-D POM) may underestimate cirrhosis-related death after liver resection.Methods: Medical records of adult cirrhotic (cirrhosis group) and matched non-cirrhotic (control group) patients, who underwent elective liver resection at Sohag University Hospital (April 2014- March 2018), were analyzed. The 90-D POM versus in-hospital mortality and 30-D POM were compared in both groups.Results: Forty-six patients (23 per group) were eligible for the study. Liver resection was carried out in all cirrhosis group patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the control group, liver resection was indicated for colorectal metastasis (13), benign masses (7) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (3). Compared with the control group, cirrhotic patients exhibited significantly higher complication rates (p<0.05), prolonged hospital stays (p<0.05), increased postoperative levels of serum bilirubin and reduced prothrombin concentration (p<0.05). In the control group, in-hospital mortality and 30-D POM were zero while 90-D POM was 4%. In the cirrhosis group, the in-hospital mortality and 30-D POM were identical (8.7%), however the 90-D POM was significantly higher and almost doubled (17%). Conclusion: Liver cirrhosis triggers significant mortality that may extend for ninety days postoperatively. In cirrhotic patients, post-hepatectomy death should be reported as 90-D POM rather than the obviously misleading in-hospital mortality or 30-D POM.

scholarly journals Feasibility and safety of liver resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotics

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2294
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdel Kahaar Aldardeer ◽  
Ashraf Mohammad El-Badry
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Complication Score ◽  
Small Hcc ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: With the current high incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), more patients even with large and huge HCC are considered for liver resection.Methods: Medical records of consecutive adult cirrhotic patients who underwent partial hepatectomy for huge HCC (≥10 cm, huge HCC group) versus small HCC (<5 cm, small HCC group) at Sohag university hospital (January 2016 to December 2020) were analyzed. Both groups were compared regarding postoperative morbidity and risk of mortality following post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) as defined by the 50-50 criteria (50% mortality occurs among patients who developed increased plasma bilirubin >50 μml/l and reduced prothrombin activity <50% on postoperative day 5 (POD-5).Results: Thirty two patients were enrolled (16 per group), with median age of 56 (range 38-81) years, 22 were males. In correlation with resection of more liver segments in the huge HCC group, post hepatectomy alteration of liver functions (bilirubin rise and reduction of albumin and prothrombin concentration) was significantly pronounced among patients who had resection for huge compared with small HCC (p<0.05). Huge HCC group exhibited significantly worse postoperative complication score (p< 0.05) and needed significantly prologed periods of hospital stay (p<0.05). Concurrent persistence of PHLF and thrombocytopenia until POD-5 occurred in 3 patients (2 with huge HCC and 1 with small HCC). Among those patients, only one from huge HCC group died (mortality 6%) postoperatively.Conclusions: Liver resection provides safe and effective treatment strategy for carefully selected cirrhotic patients with huge HCC. 

scholarly journals Combined liver-visceral resection for neoplastic lesions correlates with increased postoperative complications

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1335
Author(s):  
Ashraf Mohammad El-Badry ◽  
Mohamed Mahmoud Ali
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Resected Liver ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Complication Score ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Background: Combined liver-visceral resections (CLVRs) may impose increased risk of postoperative complications. The clinical outcome of CLVRs versus sole liver resection (SLR) has not been adequately reported from upper Egypt cancer surgery programs.Methods: Medical records of adult non-cirrhotic patients who electively underwent liver resection from February 2015 to April 2018 at Sohag University Hospital, Egypt, were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for liver resection comprised definitively malignant tumors and those with equivocal radiologic features. The severity of surgical complications, including mortality, was compared among patients who underwent CLVRs versus SLR control group with matching age, gender, number of resected liver segments, method of hepatic inflow occlusion and parenchyma transection techniques.Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled, including 13 with CLVRs group and their 13 SLR control group. Histopathologic examination of resected specimens confirmed malignancy in 17 patients (10 in CLVR group and 7 in SLR group). Major liver resection (≥3 segments) was carried out in 14 (54%) patients, 7 per each group. The complication score was significantly higher in CLVRs (p<0.05). Similarly, the length of hospital and intensive care unit stays was significantly prolonged in CLVRs group (p<0.05). Overall, 2 patients died (8%), exclusively in the CLVRs. Elderly patients (>65 years) who underwent CLVRs exhibited increased complications compared with their matching controls.Conclusions: CLVR predisposes to increased morbidity rates and mortality. It should be carried out in carefully selected patients to avoid worse clinical outcome.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome of hepatic resection for malignant liver tumors in elderly patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf M. El-Badry ◽  
Ahmed Abdelkahaar Aldardeer
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Partial Hepatectomy ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Malignant Liver Tumors ◽  
Malignant Liver

Background: Aging hinders the liver capacity to restitute its volume and function after partial hepatectomy. Concomitant hepatic parenchyma disorders and major resections may increase the susceptibility of elderly patients to worse postoperative outcome.Methods: Prospectively collected medical records of adult patients who underwent elective partial hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors at Sohag University Hospital (June 2014–May 2020) were analyzed. A group of elderly (≥65 years) were compared with a matched control group of non-elderly (<65 years) patients as regards posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and overall complications, including mortality. Markers associated with PHLF and postoperative death were investigated.Results: Forty-eight patients were enrolled, 24 per group. 34 were males (71%). All patients had primary hepatic malignancy or metastatic tumors. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the most common indication for liver resection in both groups (32 patients, 66.6%). Elderly patients exhibited significantly higher grades of overall postoperative complications (p<0.05). PHLF was significantly increased in the elderly group, in evident connection with significant persistence of higher bilirubin levels and reduced prothrombin concentration (p<0.05) until 5th postoperative day. Subgroup analysis showed that major resections and cirrhosis correlated with increased morbidity among elderly compared with younger patients. Postoperative mortality occurred in 3 elderly cirrhotic patients, who failed to recover normal platelet count postoperatively.Conclusions: In elderly patients, major liver resection for malignant tumors is associated with worse outcome, particularly in those with coexisting cirrhosis. Predictors include early postoperative thrombocytopenia and persistent hyperbilirubinemia and coagulopathy.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus Open Liver Resection: Differences in Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Outcome among Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma—A Retrospective Observational Study

HPB Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Siniscalchi ◽  
Giorgio Ercolani ◽  
Giulia Tarozzi ◽  
Lorenzo Gamberini ◽  
Lucia Cipolat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Laparoscopic Technique ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Introduction. Laparoscopic liver resection is considered risky in cirrhotic patients, even if minor surgical trauma of laparoscopy could be useful to prevent deterioration of a compromised liver function. This study aimed to identify the differences in terms of perioperative complications and early outcome in cirrhotic patients undergoing minor hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with open or laparoscopic technique. Methods. In this retrospective study, 156 cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were divided into two groups according to type of surgical approach: laparoscopy (LS group: 23 patients) or laparotomy (LT group: 133 patients). Perioperative data, mortality, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results. Groups were matched for type of resection, median number of nodules, and median diameter of largest lesions. Groups were also homogeneous for preoperative liver and renal function tests. Intraoperative haemoglobin decrease and transfusions of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were significantly lower in LS group. MELD score lasted stable after laparoscopic resection, while it increased in laparotomic group. Postoperative liver and renal failure and mortality were all lower in LS group. Conclusions. Lower morbidity and mortality, maintenance of liver function, and shorter hospital stay suggest the safety and benefit of laparoscopic approach.

Radiofrequency-Assisted liver resection in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 407-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Curro ◽  
Long Jiao ◽  
Claudio Scisca ◽  
Umberto Baccarani ◽  
Massimo Mucciardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Frequency of High MELD Score in Cirrhotic Patients undergoing Liver Resection due to Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2841-2843
Author(s):  
Muhammad Omer Farooq ◽  
Niaz Ahmed ◽  
Hassan Nadeem ◽  
Kashif Rafi ◽  
Sadia Jabbar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Score Study ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Male To Female

Objective: To determine the frequency of high MELD score in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection due to hepatocellular carcinoma also compare the frequency of mortality in patients with high or low MELD score. Study Design: Cross sectional study Place and Duration: Department of Gastroenterology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Duration: 6months i.e. 23 12-2017 to 22-06-2018. Methodology: 75 patients were enrolled. Then blood sample was obtained. Reports assessed and MELD score calculated. Scores were labeled as high or low. Patients underwent liver resection according to BCLC. The mortality was noted. All the collected data was entered and analyzed on SPSS version 22. Results: In this study out of total 75 cases 60 were males and 15 females. The mean age of patients was 39.44±9.76 years, male to female ratio was 4:1. Low MELD class was noted in 45 (60%) cases and high MELD class noted in 30(40%) cases. Mortality occurred in 27(36%) cases. Insignificant difference found between the MELD class with mortality. Conclusion: High MELD score was seen in 40% cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection due to HCC. Post HCC resection, mortality occurred in 36% patients within three months of surgery. No significant association was found between the mortality and MELD score. Keywords: MELD, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Mortality, Cirrhosis

scholarly journals Safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis using propensity score matching

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0246364
Author(s):  
Ke Cheng ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Jiaying You ◽  
Shashi Shah ◽  
Yunqiang Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Currently, safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in patients with liver cirrhosis is unknown. The aim of this study was to explore postoperative morbidity and mortality and long-term outcomes of cirrhotic patients after LPD. The study was a one-center retrospective study comprising 353 patients who underwent LPD between October 2010 and December 2019. A total of 28 patients had liver cirrhosis and were paired with 56 non-cirrhotic counterparts through propensity score matching (PSM). Baseline data, intra-operative data, postoperative data, and survival data were collected. Postoperative morbidity was considered as primary outcome whereas postoperative mortality, surgical parameters (operative durations, intraoperative blood loss), and long-term overall survival were secondary outcomes. Cirrhotic patients showed postoperative complication rates of 82% compared with rates of patients in the control group (48%) (P = 0.003). Further, Clavien-Dindo ≥III complication rates of 14% and 11% (P = 0.634), Clavien-Dindo I-II complication rates of 68% and 38% (P = 0.009), hospital mortality of 4% and 2% (P = 0.613) were observed for cirrhotic patients and non-cirrhotic patients, respectively. In addition, an overall survival rate of 32 months and 34.5 months (P = 0.991), intraoperative blood loss of 300 (200–400) ml and 150 (100–250) ml (P<0.0001), drain amount of 2572.5 (1023.8–5275) ml and 1617.5 (907.5–2700) ml (P = 0.048) were observed in the cirrhotic group and control group, respectively. In conclusion, LPD is associated with increased risk of postoperative morbidity in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, the incidence of Clavien-Dindo ≥III complications and post-operative mortality showed no significant increase. In addition, liver cirrhosis showed no correlation with poor overall survival in patients who underwent LPD. These findings imply that liver cirrhosis patients can routinely be considered for LPD at high volume centers with rigorous selection and management.

scholarly journals Efficiency of minimally invasive surgery for liver echinococcosis and its complications

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-91
Author(s):  
Z. A. Azizzoda ◽  
K. M. Kurbonov ◽  
K. R. Ruziboyzoda ◽  
S. G. Ali-Zade
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Main Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Access Surgery

Aim. Improving outcomes of diagnosis and treatment of patients with liver echinococcosis and its complications. Materials and methods. A comparative analysis of the results of surgical treatment of liver echinococcosis and its complications with traditional laparotomy access surgery (control group) and minimally invasive interventions (main group) was performed.Results. The study included 300 patients (170 in the control and 130 in the main group). In the main group, 37 (28.4%) cases performed open echinococcectomy from various mini-accesses, and 27 (20.7%) performed twostage operations using minimally invasive technology. Laparoscopic echinococcectomy was performed in 23 (17.7%) patients, laparoscopic pericystectomy 12 (9.2%) and laparoscopic liver resection in 10 (7.7%) patients. The frequency of postoperative complications in the main group was 17.7%, in the control 51.8%, postoperative mortality decreased from 2.3% to 0.8%.Conclusion. Minimally invasive technologies in the surgical treatment of liver echinococcosis show the better immediate results compared to traditional open surgical methods.

Assessment of Safety and Applicability of Laparoscopic vs Open Non Anatomical Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Mahfouz Mohammed ◽  
Hany Saeed Abdel Basset ◽  
Mohammed Abd Almegeed Elsayed ◽  
Ahmed Abdel Basset Hegazi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Laparoscopic Liver Resection ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Liver Resection ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been progressively developed along the past two decades. Liver surgery was one of the last frontiers reached by minimally invasive surgery. Surgical technique and equipment evolved to overcome technical limitations, making laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) safe and feasible. Surgeons developed skills in a stepwise approach, beginning with low complexity operations for benign diseases and reaching high-complexity surgeries for malignant cases and living donor organ harvesting. Objective s: The aim of the study is to compare short term results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy regarding to intra operative details and post-operative management and complications for achieving a safe hepatic resection for treatment of HCC in cirrhotic patients. Patients and Methods In this prospective study, a comparison between laparoscopic resection and open resection was done to compare short-term results between laparoscopic and open liver resection. This study was conducted on 30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. 15 patients (50%) were treated by laparoscopic liver resection (Group A) while the other 15 patients (50%) were treated by open liver resection (Group B). Results Regarding the demographic data, the presence of past history of medical condition and the preoperative laboratory results, no statistical significance was found. The mean operative time has statistically significant difference between the 2 groups, with decreased operative time in the laparoscopic group (P &lt; 0.001). The mean blood loss has no statistically significant difference relations between the 2 groups, (P = 0.866) with conversion rate of (13.3%) happened in two cases. Conclusion Laparoscopic liver resection is a safe and feasible treatment option for HCC in cirrhotic patient needing minor resection at laparoscopic segments (II, III, IVa,V,VI). Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC has superior short- term and comparable oncological outcomes to open liver resection. LLR should be performed for carefully selected patients and by an expert surgical team.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document