scholarly journals Seed Priming: An old empirical technique with new contemporary perspectives in respect to Pisum sativum L: A review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lokesh Gour ◽  
R. S. Ramakrishnan ◽  
Nitesh Kumar Panwar ◽  
Radheshyam Sharma ◽  
Nidhi Pathak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Seed Priming ◽  
Growth Hormones ◽  
Slow Food ◽  
Yield Performance ◽  
Crop Establishment ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Plant Stand ◽  
Major Factors

Pea is a small duration pulse crop which gives a different performance in field emergence and seed yield at different soil type and environment. Major factors that deteriorate pea yield are a fungal infection at germination, low nodules formation and slow food stimulation process to seeds. For surpassing such a problem, seed priming is the best solution. Seed priming is of many types depending upon the priming material like chemicals, bio-agents, water, nanoparticles, radiations, growth hormones and many more. Using different priming technique, seed’s hormonal and metabolomic process can be altered and managed in a positive way, resulting in better germination and appropriate plant stand with greater biological and seed yield. This review deals with different priming techniques and their effect on pea crop’s germination, phenological and yield attributing traits for getting good crop establishment and better yield performance.

Proximate and mineral composition of field peas

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Warkentin ◽  
A. G. Sloan ◽  
S. T. Ali-Khan
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Mineral Composition ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Total Protein ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
Pea Seeds ◽  
Proximate And Mineral Composition

Field pea seeds from 10 cultivars grown at two locations in Manitoba in 1986 and 1987 were analyzed for proximate and mineral profiles. Cultivars differed significantly in their level of total protein, crude fat, ADF, and all minerals tested. However, differences were not extremely large and were comparable to European reports. Location-year also had a significant effect on the levels of total protein, ADF, and all minerals tested. In most cases, the warmest location-year produced relatively higher levels of minerals, ash, and total protein, and lower seed yield than the coolest location-year. Key words: Field pea, Pisum sativum L., mineral

Inheritance of seed yield and quality traits in peas (Pisum sativum L.)

1984 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Gupta ◽  
R. S. Waldia ◽  
B. S. Dahiya ◽  
K. P. Singh ◽  
D. R. Sood
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Quality Traits ◽  
Yield And Quality ◽  
Pisum Sativum L

Effect of soil treatment with cereal straw and method of crop establishment on field pea (Pisum sativum L.) N 2 fixation

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
J. Evans ◽  
N. A. Fettell ◽  
G. E. O‘Connor ◽  
D. J. Carpenter ◽  
P. M. Chalk
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Soil Treatment ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Crop Establishment ◽  
Cereal Straw ◽  
Pisum Sativum L

Herbivory, Seed Priming, and Tillage Systems: Impacts on the Growth Response of Pisum sativum L.

1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livy Williams ◽  
D. J. Schotzko ◽  
L. E. O'Keeffe
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Conservation Tillage ◽  
Seed Priming ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Tillage Practices ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Four Levels ◽  
Peg 8000

Field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of herbivory, seed priming, and tillage practices on the growth response of Pisum sativum L. A factorial treatment design incorporated two levels of tillage treatment (moldboard and chisel plow), three levels of seed priming [Captan, PEG (polyethylene glycol) 8000, and Captan+PEG 8000], and four levels of herbivory by Sitona lineatus (L.) (caged controls, uncaged controls, 1 weevil/plant, and 8 weevils/plant). Pisum sativum stands at approximately 75% emergence were infested for 1 wk. Sitona lineatus infestations resulted in defoliation of approximately 5, 25, and 55% for the control, low, and high weevil densities, respectively. Conservation tillage led to increased surface residue but did not affect soil moisture, temperature, or compensatory growth response of P. sativum. Seed priming treatments, incorporating PEG, led to an undercompensatory growth response of P. sativum, as did high levels of S. lineatus defoliation. Improved seed priming methods that promote vigorous seedling growth may help minimize the impacts of S. lineatus and suboptimal soil conditions on P. sativum.

YIELD, SEED WEIGHT AND PROTEIN CONTENT OF FIELD PEAS AFTER SOIL AND FOLIAR TREATMENTS OF SIMAZINE AT SUBLETHAL LEVELS

1979 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-255
Author(s):  
G. H. GUBBELS
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Seed Weight ◽  
Clay Soil ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Clay Loam ◽  
Sandy Clay Loam ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Field Peas

Simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] was applied at rates of 0.002–0.800 kg a.i./ha to field peas (Pisum sativum L.) as soil and as foliar applications for 4 yr. Band applications to the soil surface over the seeded rows and incorporated beside the seeded rows in a clay soil had no effect on seed yield or protein content. However, seed yield was increased 25% in the year that seeding was early (3 May) in a fine sandy clay loam, and seed placed into the center of a band into which simazine at 0.4 kg a.i./ha had been rototilled to a depth of 10–12 cm. There were no differences in weight per seed or protein content. Foliar applications were not effective.

Productivity of processing peas as influenced by nitrogen fertilization, Rhizobium inoculation, and fungicide seed treatment

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1271-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Fritz ◽  
C. J. Rosen
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Seed Treatment ◽  
Rhizobium Leguminosarum ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Fresh Weight ◽  
Rhizobium Inoculation ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Rhizobial Inoculation ◽  
N Rates

A 3-yr field experiment determined the influence of nitrogen (N) rates (0, 23, 46 and 92 kg ha−1), rhizobial inoculation, and fungicide (captan and thiram) seed treatment on the productivity of processing peas (Pisum sativum L.). In 2 of the 3 yr, N rates up to 46 or 92 kg N ha−1 increased vine fresh weight, decreased nodulation and had no effect on seed yield. Seeds treated with fungicides or inoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viceae had no effect on vine fresh weight or seed yield. Nodule dry weight was increased in 2 of 3 yr when seeds were inoculated with Rhizobium. Key words: Pisum sativum, nodulation, rhizobia, fungicides

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document