scholarly journals Billions Lost Yearly To Earned Income Tax Credit: Errors Or Fraud?

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Barker ◽  
Chadrick Frederick

The Earned Income Tax Credit is a refundable credit designed to assist working families with children; especially those who are considered to be living at or close to the poverty level. Over the last decade billions of dollars have been lost due to the improper application and fraudulent claims of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Critics believe that the program no longer serves its intended function because of the cumulative increase in the amounts lost each year; the legislation needs a major overhaul. The IRS have claimed that over 60 percent of the overpayments of EITC is due to manipulation of self-employed income and expenses, unqualified dependents being claimed, and misuse of single and head of household filing status. Even though the penalties for fraud and the lack of exercising due diligence are severe, these crimes continue to occur. While the tax authorities and other legislative bodies explore ways to combat these fraudulent claims, CPAs and other tax-preparers can assist in the fight against these crimes. As the de facto gatekeepers of the tax revenues, they are encouraged to exercise intensive due diligence and professional skepticism when claiming EITC for their clients. 

Author(s):  
Melinda Lewis ◽  
Sondra G. Beverly

The federal Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is a refundable tax credit for working families with low and moderate incomes. The credit provides a substantial income supplement to families with children and thus helps families finance basic necessities or invest in longer-term household development. In recent years, political support for the EITC has declined. Social workers should be prepared to advocate against policy changes that would reduce the impact of the EITC. Social workers could also support EITC outreach campaigns and advocate for more and expanded state EITCs.


2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Schmidt ◽  
Edward M. Werner

This paper documents that the earned income of taxpayers claiming the earned income tax credit (EITC) tends to cluster within $800 intervals surrounding the kink points of the EITC benefit distribution. This clustering is especially strong for head of household taxpayers around the kink point of the phase-in range and, to a lesser extent, for married filing joint taxpayers around the kink point of the phase-out range. The results from logit regression models estimated by filing status and kink point location indicate that “secondary evasion” with respect to the EITC is more associated with the characteristics of head of household taxpayers than those of married filing joint taxpayers.


ILR Review ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 619
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Couch ◽  
Saul D. Hoffman ◽  
Laurence S. Seidman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document