scholarly journals The Impact of Political Competition on Countries’ Economic Development Through the Public Decision-Making Processess

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annunziata Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Political Competition ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Public Decision ◽  
Public Decision Making

scholarly journals Art. 30 da LINDB - O dever público de incrementar a segurança jurídica

2018 ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Egon Bockmann Moreira ◽  
Paula Pessoa Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Institutional Design ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Normative Order ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Public Decision ◽  
Public Decision Making

<p>Article 30 of LINDB - The public duty to increase legal certainty</p><p> </p><p>A LINDB constitui um sistema de aplicação do Direito Público, por meio de condicionantes de validade das decisões, lado a lado com respectivos parâmetros de aplicabilidade. O artigo 30, aqui comentado, diz respeito ao dever de instauração e incremento da segurança jurídica<em> </em>por meio do aperfeiçoamento do desenho institucional da ordem normativa. Ele convive com os fenômenos da indeterminação do direito, do impacto do constitucionalismo na atividade decisória estatal e foca no dever de criação de precedentes<em> </em>(<em>lato sensu</em>), como critérios de racionalidade, legitimidade e institucionalidade da atividade decisória pública.</p><p> </p><p class="Pa32">LINDB today constitutes a system of application of Public Law, by means of conditioners of validity of the decisions, side by side with parameters of applicability of these same decisions. Article 30, which will be discussed here, concerns the duty to establish legal certainty by improving the institutional design of the normative order. It coexists with the phenomena of the indeterminacy of law, of the impact of constitutionalism on the state's decision-making activity, and thus focuses on the duty to create precedents, like judicial ones, when these are presented as criteria of rationality, legitimacy and institutionality of public decision-making activity, arguments object of this paper.</p>

Public Participation in Local Regeneration Programmes in Poland

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-60
Author(s):  
Magdalena Miśkowiec ◽  
Katarzyna Maria Gorczyca
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Public Participation ◽  
Urban Space ◽  
Social Activity ◽  
Urban Regeneration ◽  
Local Communities ◽  
The Public ◽  
Ict Tools ◽  
Public Decision ◽  
Public Decision Making

This article describes how the public participation is understood as involvement of individuals, groups and local communities in public decision making. On 9 October 2015, the Urban Regeneration Act was passed in Poland. The purpose of the Act is to integrate the local activities of the stakeholders in regeneration. Engaging stakeholders is essential for proper implementation of regeneration programmes and is aimed at preventing degradation of urban space and crisis phenomena by enhancing social activity. The main aim of the article is to focus on different forms of public participation in urban regeneration. The study includes an analysis of the public participation procedures employed during the implementation of Communal Regeneration Programmes in Poland, as exemplified by the Olkusz Commune. The analysis is summarised to form a model of public participation in regeneration programmes, including suggestions for the use of ICT tools for consultation purposes.

Supporting Public Decision Making - A Progressive Approach Aided by an Ontology

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryse Salles
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Specific Context ◽  
Development Policies ◽  
The World ◽  
Methodological Problems ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Public Decision ◽  
Public Decision Making

This paper discusses a number of results from the CAVALA project, a project which was set up to design a method for defining assessment indicators in relation to territorial economic development policies. An analysis of the particularities of the field and the specific context is proposed. With these particularities in mind, we preferred a progressive approach in the implementation of decision-making tools and we included the construction of an ontology as a prerequisite. The phases leading up to the design of this ontology are explained. An analysis of the texts that set out the Regional Council’s policy on economic development allowed us to identify the existence of competing visions of the world (doxai). The co-existence of these doxai made it necessary for us to construct a polydoxical ontology, that is, integrating several discrete doxai. This choice generated specific methodological problems for which we are able to provide an insight. An illustration is given via an excerpt from the ontology consisting of two doxai for the concept of “territory.”

scholarly journals Testing the open government recipe: Are vision and voice good governance ingredients?

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Ingrams ◽  
Wesley Kaufmann ◽  
Daan Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Open Government ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Survey Experiment ◽  
Two Component ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Public Decision ◽  
Public Decision Making

Existing research shows that open government can result in better governance outcomes. However, there remains a gap in our understanding of how open government’s two component dimensions of transparency and participation – “vision” and “voice” – affect governance outcomes, and how they relate to each other within public decision-making. We use a survey experiment to test the impact of transparency and participation on a range of governance outcomes (satisfaction, perception of fairness, and trust) in a municipal decision-making process. The findings show that both transparency and participation positively affect these governance outcomes. However, we do not find support for an interaction effect of transparency and participation. Implications for research and practitioners are discussed.

scholarly journals Die proses van partikuliere en openbare besluitneming

1983 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-87
Author(s):  
S. S. Brand
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
The One ◽  
Two Sectors ◽  
Public Decision ◽  
Public Decision Making

Private and public decision-making The interaction between the private and public sectors is important in South Africa. Much criticism is expressed by the one sector against the other. This can be partly attributed to an incomplete understanding of the processes of decision-making in the two sectors, and of the differences between them. A comparison is drawn between the most important elements of the decision-making processes in the two sectors. Public decision-making deals mostly with matters concerning the community and the economy as a whole, whereas private decision-making is concerned mostly with parts of the whole. The aims at which decision-making in the two sectors are directed, differ accordingly, as do the perceptions of the respective decision-makers of the environment in which they make decisions. As a consequence, the criteria for the success of a decision also differ substantially between the two sectors. The implications of these differences between private and public decision-making for the approach to inflation and the financing of housing, are dealt with as examples. Finally, differences between the ways in which decisions are implemented in the two sectors, also appear to be an important cause of much of the criticism from the private sector about decision-making in the public sector.

scholarly journals Digital Agora: A Physical and Digital Space for Participatory Democracy

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Henrique H.F. de Cristo ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Direct Democracy ◽  
Participatory Democracy ◽  
Public Policies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Digital Space ◽  
Global Demand ◽  
The City ◽  
Public Decision ◽  
Public Decision Making

This paper presents the concept of the Digital Agora(DA): a physical + digital space for participatory democracy that responds to the global demand for more participation on the public decision making of cities by integrating specific public policies for instruments of direct democracy, spaces for systematization, synthesis and articulation, and effective technologies to generate a new calibration between representative and direct democracy at the city level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document