scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Topoisomerase 2-Alpha and B-Myb in Early Breast Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Author(s):  
Ljubica Radmilović Varga
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 544-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pier Franco Conte ◽  
Gaia Griguolo ◽  
Maria Vittoria Dieci ◽  
Giancarlo Bisagni ◽  
Alba Ariela Brandes ◽  
...  

544 Background: We investigated the prognostic role of the PAM50 HER2-enriched (HER2-E) subtype in HER2+ early breast cancer enrolled in the randomized Phase III ShortHER trial. Methods: The ShortHER study randomized 1254 HER2+ early breast cancer patients to receive 9 weeks vs 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy. Gene expression measured using nCounter platform was available for 438 surgical samples. Intrinsic subtyping was determined using the research-based PAM50 predictor. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was calculated from randomization to distant disease recurrence or death (median follow up 72 months). Uni- and multi-variable analysis were performed using Cox models. Results: PAM50 subtype distribution was: HER2-E 53% (N = 233), Luminal A 20% (N = 87), Luminal B 10% (N = 43), Normal-like 11% (N = 48) and Basal-like 6% (N = 27). HER2-E subtype was associated with hormone receptor-negative status (p < 0.001) and TILs ≥20% (p < 0.001), but not with stage and age ( < or ≥60 yrs). HER2-E subtype was associated with worse MFS vs other PAM50 subtypes overall (HR 2.78, p = 0.001), in the short (HR 2.24, p = 0.046), and in the long arm (HR 4.04, p = 0.011). Multivariable Cox model confirmed the independent prognostic value of HER2-E subtype (Table). HER2-E subtype added significant prognostic value on top of clinicopathological variables (Likelihood ratio test p < 0.001). Conclusions: HER2-E intrinsic subtype is an independent prognostic factor for HER2+ early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Integration of PAM50 subtype in prognostic algorithms can help refine risk stratification. These findings warrant independent validation. Clinical trial information: NCT00629278. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (17) ◽  
pp. 2826-2839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Caputo ◽  
Daniela Cianniello ◽  
Antonio Giordano ◽  
Michela Piezzo ◽  
Maria Riemma ◽  
...  

The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to hormonal therapy is often considered questionable in patients with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer. Low risk of disease relapse after endocrine treatment alone and/or a low sensitivity to chemotherapy are reasons behind not all patients benefit from chemotherapy. Most of the patients could be exposed to unnecessary treatment- related adverse events and health care costs when treatment decision-making is based only on classical clinical histological features. Gene expression profile has been developed to refine physician’s decision-making process and to tailor personalized treatment to patients. In particular, these tests are designed to spare patients the side effects of unnecessary treatment, and ensure that adjuvant chemotherapy is correctly recommended to patients with early breast cancer. In this review, we will discuss the main diagnostic tests and their potential clinical applications (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, PAM50/Prosigna, EndoPredict, MapQuant Dx, IHC4, and Theros-Breast Cancer Gene Expression Ratio Assay).


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 2190-2198
Author(s):  
Dalia Kamel ◽  
Veronica Youssef ◽  
Wilma M. Hopman ◽  
Mihaela Mates

Background: In 2012, the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) identified five key opportunities in oncology to improve patient care, recommending against imaging tests for the staging of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) at low risk for metastases. Similarly, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline does not support radiological staging in asymptomatic EBC (aEBC). The purpose of this study was to assess local practice and outcomes of staging investigations (SIs) in aEBC at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO). Methods: A retrospective electronic and paper chart review was undertaken to identify all aEBC patients treated at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014. Patients with pathological staging of T1-T2 and N0-1 with any receptor status were included. We collected patient demographics, treatment and pathologic tumor characteristics. The use and outcomes of initial and follow-up SIs were recorded. Data were analyzed to determine associations between the use of SIs and clinical characteristics (chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests). Results: From 2012 to 2014, 295 asymptomatic EBC patients were identified. The mean age was 64, 81% were postmenopausal and 76% had breast conserving surgery. Stage distribution was as follows: stage I 42%, stage IIA 37% and stage IIB 21%. Receptor status was as follows: ER+ 84%, HER2+ 13% and triple negative 12%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 36%, Trastuzumab by 10% and endocrine therapy by 76% of patients. Baseline SIs were performed in 168 patients (57%) for a total of 332 tests. Overt metastatic disease was found in five patients (one bone scan and four CT scans). Seventy-one out of the 168 patients (42%) who received initial staging imaging underwent 138 follow-up imaging tests, none of which were diagnostic for metastases. Nine patients with suspicious CT findings underwent biopsies, of which four were malignant (one metastatic breast cancer and three new primaries). Factors significantly associated with SI were as follows: younger age (p = 0.001), premenopausal status (p = 0.01), T2 stage (p < 0.001), N1 stage (p < 0.001), HER2 positive (p < 0.001), triple negative status (p = 0.007) and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over a 3-year period at our institution, more than 50% of aEBC patients underwent a total of 470 initial and follow-up staging tests, yielding a cancer diagnosis (metastatic breast cancer or second primary cancer) in four patients. We, therefore, conclude that routine-staging investigations in aEBC patients have low diagnostic value, supporting current guidelines that recommend against the routine use of SI in this population.


Author(s):  
Simon Peter Gampenrieder ◽  
Gabriel Rinnerthaler ◽  
Richard Greil

SummaryThe three top abstracts at the 2020 virtual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium regarding hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, from our point of view, were the long-awaited results from PenelopeB and RxPONDER as well as the data from the ADAPT trial of the West German Study Group. PenelopeB failed to show any benefit by adjuvant palbociclib when added to standard endocrine therapy in patients without pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RxPONDER demonstrated that postmenopausal patients with early hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−) breast cancer, 1–3 positive lymph nodes and an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score of less than 26 can safely be treated with endocrine therapy alone. In contrast, in premenopausal women with positive nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy plays still a role even in case of low genomic risk. Whether the benefit by chemotherapy is mainly an indirect endocrine effect and if ovarian function suppression would be similarly effective, is still a matter of debate. The HR+/HER2− part of the ADAPT umbrella trial investigated the role of a Ki-67 response to a short endocrine therapy before surgery in addition to Oncotype DX—performed on the pretreatment biopsy—to identify low-risk patients who can safely forgo adjuvant chemotherapy irrespective of menopausal status.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document