Facies Distribution in Sediment-gravity-flow Deposits Constructing Sediment Waves: an Outcrop Example of Forearc Basin Fills, Neogene Aoshima Formation, Southwest Japan

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Onishi ◽  
Kiwako Takii-Kawakami ◽  
Hiroko Abe ◽  
Yoshiro Ishihara
2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 561-572
Author(s):  
Hana Sasaki ◽  
Yasunori Sasaki ◽  
Megumi Saito-Kato ◽  
Hajime Naruse ◽  
Yoshiro Ishihara

ABSTRACT Bed-thickness frequency distributions of sediment-gravity-flow deposits, especially turbidites, are one of the major interests of sedimentology. Lognormal, power-law, exponential, and truncated normal distributions have all been proposed for their frequency distributions. Although these frequency distributions have been obtained from many field observations and estimated from statistical models, problems associated with the complexity of sedimentary processes have remained. In this study, bed-thickness frequency distributions and the recurrence intervals of sediment-gravity-flow deposits intercalated in the Pleistocene lacustrine varved diatomite in southwest Japan were analyzed. The results reveal that the bed thicknesses of sediment-gravity-flow deposits induced by different mechanisms show different types of frequency distribution. For example, flood-induced sediment-gravity-flow deposits show power-law-like distributions, whereas such deposits caused by lake-slope-failure show lognormal distributions. The suggestion is that flood-induced types are deposited from floods having a power-law scale. However, the bed thicknesses of the deposits induced by lake-slope-failure do not purely reflect the event scale, because the lateral variation of their thicknesses reflects the depositional processes. The recurrence intervals of both types of event show Poisson-like distributions except for lake-slope-failure deposits at the slope-base section. Despite observed ranges, the distributions of lake-slope-failure deposits at the slope-base section have a high amount of zero value and the recurrence interval show exponentially decreasing. These results suggest that both events were generated randomly, despite different origins. In addition, the incompleteness of the records was also suggested from sediment bypass of a lake-slope-failure event at the slope-base section.


1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Schwab ◽  
Homa J. Lee ◽  
Bruce F. Molnia

Geology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana R. Soria ◽  
Carlos L. Liesa ◽  
Maria Pilar Mata ◽  
José A. Arz ◽  
Laia Alegret ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 263 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Khripounoff ◽  
Annick Vangriesheim ◽  
Philippe Crassous ◽  
Joel Etoubleau

Geology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1149-1153
Author(s):  
Yang Peng ◽  
Cornel Olariu ◽  
Ronald J. Steel

Abstract Many modern deltas exhibit a compound geometry that consists of a shoreline clinoform and a larger subaqueous clinoform connected through a subaqueous platform. Despite the ubiquity of compound clinoforms in modern deltas, very few examples have been documented from the ancient sedimentary record. We present recognition criteria for shelf compound-clinoform systems in both tide- and wave-dominated deltas by integration of ancient and modern examples from multiple types of data. The compound clinothem can be identified by using a combination of: (1) the three-dimensional (3-D) configuration identified in bathymetric or seismic data, (2) bipartite stacked regressive units, consisting of a lower muddy coarsening-to-fining-upward (CUFU) or coarsening-upward (CU) unit (30–100 m thick) and an overlying sandier CU unit (5–30 m thick) (together they represent the subaqueous and shoreline clinoform pair), and (3) distinct facies described herein, though both types of delta have highly bioturbated mudstone and siltstone bottomsets. Tide-dominated deltas have muddy foresets with tidal scours containing tidal rhythmites or inclined heterolithic strata in the subaqueous clinothem overlain by river and tidal deposits of the shoreline clinothem. Wave-dominated deltas show mainly wave-enhanced sediment-gravity-flow (WSGF) beds and some thin hummocky/swaley cross-stratified (HCS/SCS) sandstones toward the top in the subaqueous muddy foreset, and upward-thickening HCS/SCS and trough/planar cross-bedded sandstones interbedded with siltstones in the shoreline clinothem. The subaqueous platform, which links the clinoform couplet, shows evidence of frequent tidal or wave reworking and redeposition. The platform in tide-dominated deltas is characterized by tide-generated heterolithic strata (e.g., bidirectional current-rippled and cross-stratified sandstones, spring and neap tidal bundles, tidal rhythmites) with occasional storm-wave–influenced strata. In contrast, the wave-dominated platform comprises small-scale swales with scours and mud clasts and some WSGF deposits. The proposed criteria can aid in the recognition of compound deltaic clinothems in other basins, particularly those with limited amounts and/or types of data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document