scholarly journals Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Sawada ◽  
Akiyoshi Kasuga ◽  
Takafumi Mie ◽  
Takaaki Furukawa ◽  
Takanobu Taniguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background There is no established second-line treatment after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as a second-line therapy for MPC and investigate prognostic factors for survival. Methods From 2015–2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients receiving mFFX for MPC after failure of GnP therapy. Patients were treated every 2 weeks with mFFX (intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , intravenous irinotecan 150 mg/m 2 , and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m 2 for 46 hours without bolus infusion) until disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity. Results In total, 104 patients received mFFX. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-9.8) and the progression-free survival (PFS) 3.9 months (95% CI 2.8-5.0). The objective response rate was 10.6% and the disease control rate 56.7%. The median relative dose intensities of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional 5-FU were 80.0% (range 21.5-100%), 77.2% (range 38.1-100%), and 85.9% (range 36.9-100%), respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 57 patients (54.8%), including neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Glasgow prognostic score and carcinoembryonic antigen level were independently associated with survival. Our prognostic model using these parameters could classify the patients into good (n = 38), intermediate (n = 47), and poor (n = 19) prognostic groups. The median OS and PFS time was 14.7 (95% CI 7.6-16.3) and 7.6 months (95% CI 4.1-10.5) for the good prognostic factors, 6.5 (95% CI 5.5-10.0) and 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7-4.8) for the intermediate prognostic factors and 5.0 (95% CI 2.9-6.6) and 1.7 months (95% CI 0.9-4.3) for the poor prognostic factors, respectively. Conclusions The mFFX showed to be a tolerable second-line treatment for MPC after GnP failure. Our prognostic model might be useful for deciding whether mFFX is indicated in this setting.

scholarly journals Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Sawada ◽  
Akiyoshi Kasuga ◽  
Takafumi Mie ◽  
Takaaki Furukawa ◽  
Takanobu Taniguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background There is no established second-line treatment after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as a second-line therapy for MPC and investigate prognostic factors for survival. Methods From 2015–2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients receiving mFFX for MPC after failure of GnP therapy. Patients were treated every 2 weeks with mFFX (intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , intravenous irinotecan 150 mg/m 2 , and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m 2 for 46 hours without bolus infusion) until disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity. Results In total, 104 patients received mFFX. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-9.8) and the progression-free survival (PFS) 3.9 months (95% CI 2.8-5.0). The objective response rate was 10.6% and the disease control rate 56.7%. The median relative dose intensities of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional 5-FU were 80.0% (range 21.5-100%), 77.2% (range 38.1-100%), and 85.9% (range 36.9-100%), respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 57 patients (54.8%), including neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Glasgow prognostic score and carcinoembryonic antigen level were independently associated with survival. Our prognostic model using these parameters could classify the patients into good (n = 38), intermediate (n = 47), and poor (n = 19) prognostic groups. The median OS and PFS time was 14.7 (95% CI 7.6-16.3) and 7.6 months (95% CI 4.1-10.5) for the good prognostic factors, 6.5 (95% CI 5.5-10.0) and 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7-4.8) for the intermediate prognostic factors and 5.0 (95% CI 2.9-6.6) and 1.7 months (95% CI 0.9-4.3) for the poor prognostic factors, respectively. Conclusions The mFFX showed to be a tolerable second-line treatment for MPC after GnP failure. Our prognostic model might be useful for deciding whether mFFX is indicated in this setting.

scholarly journals Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Sawada ◽  
Akiyoshi Kasuga ◽  
Takafumi Mie ◽  
Takaaki Furukawa ◽  
Takanobu Taniguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background There is no established second-line treatment after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as a second-line therapy for MPC and investigate prognostic factors for survival. Methods From 2015–2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients receiving mFFX for MPC after failure of GnP therapy. Patients were treated every 2 weeks with mFFX (intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , intravenous irinotecan 150 mg/m 2 , and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m 2 for 46 hours without bolus infusion) until disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity. Results In total, 104 patients received mFFX. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-9.8) and the progression-free survival (PFS) 3.9 months (95% CI 2.8-5.0). The objective response rate was 10.6% and the disease control rate 56.7%. The median relative dose intensities of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional 5-FU were 80.0% (range 21.5-100%), 77.2% (range 38.1-100%), and 85.9% (range 36.9-100%), respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 57 patients (54.8%), including neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Glasgow prognostic score and carcinoembryonic antigen level were independently associated with survival. Our prognostic model using these parameters could classify the patients into good (n = 38), intermediate (n = 47), and poor (n = 19) prognostic groups. The median OS and PFS time was 14.7 (95% CI 7.6-16.3) and 7.6 months (95% CI 4.1-10.5) for the good prognostic factors, 6.5 (95% CI 5.5-10.0) and 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7-4.8) for the intermediate prognostic factors and 5.0 (95% CI 2.9-6.6) and 1.7 months (95% CI 0.9-4.3) for the poor prognostic factors, respectively. Conclusions The mFFX showed to be a tolerable second-line treatment for MPC after GnP failure. Our prognostic model might be useful for deciding whether mFFX is indicated in this setting.

scholarly journals Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Sawada ◽  
Akiyoshi Kasuga ◽  
Takafumi Mie ◽  
Takaaki Furukawa ◽  
Takanobu Taniguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Purpose There is no established second-line treatment after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as a second-line therapy for MPC and investigate prognostic factors for survival.Methods From 2015–2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients receiving mFFX for MPC after failure of GnP therapy. Patients were treated every 2 weeks with mFFX (intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, intravenous irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m2 for 46 hours without bolus infusion) until disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity.Results In total, 104 patients received mFFX. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-9.8) and the progression-free survival (PFS) 3.9 months (95% CI 2.8-5.0). The objective response rate was 10.6% and the disease control rate 56.7%. The median relative dose intensities of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional 5-FU were 80.0% (range 21.5-100%), 77.2% (range 38.1-100%), and 85.9% (range 36.9-100%), respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 57 patients (54.8%), including neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Glasgow prognostic score and carcinoembryonic antigen level were independently associated with survival. Our prognostic model using these parameters could classify the patients into good (n = 38), intermediate (n = 47), and poor (n = 19) prognostic groups. The median OS and PFS time was 14.7 (95% CI 7.6-16.3) and 7.6 months (95% CI 4.1-10.5) for the good prognostic factors, 6.5 (95% CI 5.5-10.0) and 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7-4.8) for the intermediate prognostic factors and 5.0 (95% CI 2.9-6.6) and 1.7 months (95% CI 0.9-4.3) for the poor prognostic factors, respectively.Conclusions The mFFX showed to be a tolerable second-line treatment for MPC after GnP failure. Our prognostic model might be useful for deciding whether mFFX is indicated in this setting.

scholarly journals Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (24) ◽  
pp. 2545-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davendra P.S. Sohal ◽  
Erin B. Kennedy ◽  
Alok Khorana ◽  
Mehmet S. Copur ◽  
Christopher H. Crane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Comorbidity Profile

Purpose In 2016, ASCO published a guideline to assist in clinical decision making in metastatic pancreatic cancer for initial assessment after diagnosis, first- and second-line treatment options, palliative and supportive care, and follow-up. The purpose of this update is to incorporate new evidence related to second-line therapy for patients who have experienced disease progression or intolerable toxicity during first-line therapy. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on second-line therapy published between June 2015 and January 2018. Recommendations on other topics covered in the 2016 Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Guideline were endorsed by the Expert Panel. Results Two new studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations For second-line therapy, gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus nanoliposomal irinotecan can be offered to patients with first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel, an ECOG PS of 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus irinotecan or fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin may be offered when there is a lack of availability of fluorouracil plus nanoliposomal irinotecan; gemcitabine or fluorouracil should be offered to patients with either an ECOG PS of 2 or a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens. Testing select patients for mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability is recommended, and pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with mismatch repair deficiency or high microsatellite instability tumors. Endorsed recommendations from the 2016 version of this guideline for computed tomography, baseline performance status and comorbidity profile, defining goals of care, first-line therapy, and palliative care are also contained within the full guideline text. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2722-2730 ◽  
Author(s):  
B L Weber ◽  
C Vogel ◽  
S Jones ◽  
H Harvey ◽  
L Hutchins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

PURPOSE We evaluated single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as first- and second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC) in patients who were not resistant to anthracyclines. Objective tumor response (TR) and toxicity were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 107 women were enrolled onto this multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label phase II study. Patients were stratified into first- and second-line treatment groups, based on prior treatment history. Vinorelbine was initially given at 30 mg/m2/wk, with dose modification for toxicity as indicated. Therapy was continued until disease progression or severe toxicity mandated withdrawal or until the patient asked to be removed from the study. RESULTS The objective response rate for all patients was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 44%): 35% (95% CI, 23% to 48%) for first-line patients and 32% (95% CI, 20% to 47%) for second-line patients. Nine first-line and three second-line patients obtained a complete response (CR). The median duration of objective response was 34 weeks in both groups. The overall survival durations of first- and second-line patients were 67 weeks and 62 weeks, respectively. Granulocytopenia was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Two patients died on study as a result of granulocytopenic sepsis. CONCLUSION Single-agent vinorelbine is an effective and well-tolerated agent for first- and second-line therapy of ABC. The results of this study confirm the findings of similar international trials and suggest vinorelbine should be considered a valid treatment option for patients with ABC and a potential component in future combination regimens for this disease.

scholarly journals Erratum: Second-line therapy after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or after gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (9) ◽  
pp. e13-e13 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Daniel D Von Hoff ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Robert El-Maraghi ◽  
Wen Wee Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Second-line therapy with pemetrexed after gemcitabine failure in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4124-4124 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Boeck ◽  
K. Weigang-Koehler ◽  
M. Fuchs ◽  
E. Kettner ◽  
D. Quietzsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

4124 Background: There is no established second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of standard first-line treatment with gemcitabine. In view of the urgent need of such therapy and the observation of clinically meaningful responses with pemetrexed in previously untreated pancreatic cancer, this phase II study evaluated pemetrexed as second-line therapy. Methods: This study was planned to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in 54 patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (stage II-IV), ECOG performance status ≤2 and estimated life expectancy of ≥12 weeks (wks) after failure of first-line gemcitabine single agent or combination therapy. Pemetrexed was started at 500 mg/m2 q3w (10 min infusion), with vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation. Dose escalation by 100 mg/m2 every other cycle and an unlimited number of cycles were allowed. Primary endpoint was the 3-month survival rate. Results: A total of 189 treatment cycles (median 2, range 1–20) was given to 52 pts (60% male, median age 63 yrs, median time since initial diagnosis 32 wks, 89% stage IV disease). Doses were escalated in 2 pts (4%) and reduced due to toxicity in 9 pts (17%); median dose per cycle was 500 mg/m2 (range 212–700 mg/m2). The 3-month survival rate was 75% (95% CI 63.2–86.8%). At a median follow-up of 20 wks, the median overall survival estimate was 20 wks, with 9 pts alive including 1 still on pemetrexed. Median TTP was 7 wks (range 1–62 wks). The overall response rate was 3.8% (0 CR, 2 PR); 12 pts (23%) had SD for ≥6 wks, 9 of them for ≥12 wks. CA 19–9 decreased at least once by ≥ 50% in 12 pts (23%). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity rates per pt were as follows: neutropenia 17.3% (febrile neutopenia: 3.8%), leukopenia 15.4%, thrombopenia 5.8% and anemia 3.8%. Conclusion: Pemetrexed is a feasible option for second-line therapy with mild toxicity and encouraging activity in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure. [Table: see text]

Sunitinib therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Updated results of two phase II trials and prognostic factor analysis for survival

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5095-5095 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Rosenberg ◽  
R. J. Motzer ◽  
M. D. Michaelson ◽  
B. G. Redman ◽  
G. R. Hudes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Line Therapy

5095 Background: Two single-arm phase 2 trials reported a 42% objective response rate (ORR) with sunitinib as second-line therapy in mRCC pts (JAMA 2006;295:2516–24). Efficacy results were updated and an analysis of prognostic factors for survival was performed on pooled data. Methods: Eligibility criteria and treatment plan were nearly identical for both trials. Pts with mRCC who failed =1 prior cytokine-based therapy received sunitinib in repeated 6-week cycles of 50 mg/day orally for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment. Response was assessed by investigators according to RECIST. Pretreatment clinical and biochemical features were examined for prognostic factors by univariate and multivariate analysis (p<0.05 significance level was used in the backward stepwise selection procedure). Results: Updated efficacy data for 168 evaluable pts showed an ORR of 45% (95% CI: 39%, 54%), median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.4 months (95% CI: 7.9, 10.7), and median overall survival (OS) of 22.3 months (95% CI: 14.8, 36.0). Twenty pts remain on treatment with sunitinib with the longest pt on the drug for >3.5 years with partial response for >3 years. The median duration of response was 11.6 months (95% CI: 9.9, 15.2), and included 1 pt with a complete response for >2 years. The proportion of pts alive at 2 years is 48%. Final prognostic factors for survival in the multivariate model were ECOG PS 0 vs. =1 (p=0.0034); time interval from diagnosis to sunitinib treatment =1 yr vs. <1 yr (p=0.0002); hemoglobin =13 vs. <13 g/dL for males and =11.5 vs. <11.5 g/dL for females (p=0.0002). Conclusions: Median survival is nearly 2 years, which compares favorably to the historical experience (12.7 months) in second-line therapy with other agents (JCO 2004;22:454–63). The influence of sunitinib therapy on patient survival is being investigated in a randomized phase 3 trial compared to interferon-a in first-line therapy for mRCC. Further study of prognostic factors to sunitinib therapy is warranted in the first-line setting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document