scholarly journals Feasibility of a modified search, coagulation, and clipping method with and without the use of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue for preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Abiko ◽  
Soichiro Oda ◽  
Akimitsu Meno ◽  
Akane Shido ◽  
Sonoe Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
Polyglycolic Acid ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background: Methods have been developed for preventing delayed bleeding (DB) after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (GESD). However, none of the methods can completely prevent DB. We hypothesized that DB could be prevented by a modified search, coagulation, and clipping (MSCC) method for patients at low risk for DB and by combining the use of polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets and fibrin glue with the MSCC method (PMSCC method) for patients at high risk for DB (antibleeding [ABI] strategy). This study assessed the technical feasibility of this novel strategy.Methods: We investigated 123 lesions in 121 consecutive patients who underwent GESD in Kushiro Rosai Hospital between April 2018 and January 2020. The decision for continuation or cessation of antithrombotic agents was based on the Guidelines for Gastroenterological Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Treatment.Results: Oral antithrombotic agents were administered to 28 patients (22.8%). The en bloc R0 resection rate was 98.4%. The MSCC method and the PMSCC method for preventing DB were performed in 114 and 9 lesions, respectively. The median resection time of the MSCC method was 16 min, and the median speed (the resection area divided by the resection time) was 3.6 cm2/10 min. The median resection time of the PMSCC method was 59 min, and the median speed was 1.3 cm2/10 min. The only delayed procedural adverse event was DB in 1 (0.8%) of the 123 lesions.Conclusions: The ABI strategy is feasible for preventing DB both in patients at low risk and in those at high risk for DB after GESD, whereas the PMSCC method may be necessary for reduction of time.

scholarly journals Feasibility of a modified search, coagulation, and clipping method with and without the use of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue for preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Abiko ◽  
Soichiro Oda ◽  
Akimitsu Meno ◽  
Akane Shido ◽  
Sonoe Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
Polyglycolic Acid ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background Methods have been developed for preventing delayed bleeding (DB) after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (GESD). However, none of the methods can completely prevent DB. We hypothesized that DB could be prevented by a modified search, coagulation, and clipping (MSCC) method for patients at low risk for DB and by combining the use of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue with the MSCC method (PMSCC method) for patients at high risk for DB (antibleeding [ABI] strategy). This study assessed the technical feasibility of this novel strategy. Method We investigated 123 lesions in 121 consecutive patients who underwent GESD in Kushiro Rosai Hospital between April 2018 and January 2020. The decision for continuation or cessation of antithrombotic agents was based on the Guidelines for Gastroenterological Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Treatment. Results Oral antithrombotic agents were administered to 28 patients (22.8%). The en bloc R0 resection rate was 98.4%. The MSCC method and the PMSCC method for preventing DB were performed in 114 and 9 lesions, respectively. The median time of the MSCC method was 16 min, and the median speed (the resection area divided by the time of method used) was 3.6 cm2/10 min. The median time of the PMSCC method was 59 min, and the median speed was 1.3 cm2/10 min. The only delayed procedural adverse event was DB in 1 (0.8%) of the 123 lesions. Conclusions The ABI strategy is feasible for preventing DB both in patients at low risk and in those at high risk for DB after GESD, whereas the PMSCC method may be necessary for reduction of time.

scholarly journals Feasibility of a Modified SCC Method With and Without Combining the Use of PGA Sheets and Fibrin Glue for Preventing Delayed Bleeding After Gastric ESD

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Abiko ◽  
Soichiro Oda ◽  
Akimitsu Meno ◽  
Akane Shido ◽  
Sonoe Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Rosai Hospital ◽  
Novel Strategy

Abstract Background: Some methods have been developed for preventing delayed bleeding (DB) after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (GESD). However, none of the methods can completely prevent DB. We hypothesized that DB can be prevented by a modified the search, coagulation, and clipping (MSCC) method for patients at low risk of DB and by combining the use of PGA sheets and fibrin glue with the MSCC method (PMSCC method) for patients at high risk of DB (anti-bleeding [ABI] strategy). In this study, the technical feasibility of this novel strategy was assessed.Methods: We investigated 123 lesions in 121 consecutive patients who underwent GESD in Kushiro Rosai Hospital between April 2018 and January 2020. The decision for continuation or cessation of antithrombotic agents was based on the Guidelines for Gastroenterological Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Antithrombotic Treatment.Results: Oral antithrombotic agents were administered to 28 patients (22.8%). En bloc R0 resection rate was 98.4%. The MSCC method and PMSCC method for preventing were performed in 114 and 9 lesions, respectively. The median time of the MSCC method was 16 min and the median speed was 3.6 cm2/10min. The median time of the PMSCC method was 59 min and the median speed was 1.3 cm2/10min. The only delayed procedural adverse event was DB in one (0.8%) of the 123 lesions. Conclusions: The ABI strategy is feasible for preventing DB in patients at low risk and high risk of DB after GESD, whereas the PMSCC method may be necessary for reduction of time.

scholarly journals Polyglycolic Acid Felt Sealing Method for Prevention of Bleeding Related to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Fukuda ◽  
Naoyuki Yamaguchi ◽  
Hajime Isomoto ◽  
Kayoko Matsushima ◽  
Hitomi Minami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Polyglycolic Acid ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Prevention Method ◽  
Pga Felt

Background and Study Aims. When performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for patients on antithrombotic agents, the frequency of delayed bleeding is expected to increase. The endoscopic polyglycolic acid (PGA) felt and fibrin glue sealing method could be a new method for prevention of delayed bleeding.Patients and Methods. The safety and efficacy of the endoscopic tissue sealing method with PGA sheets and fibrin glue for the prevention of post-ESD bleeding were examined in 104 patients taking antithrombotic agents. During the study period, 70 patients taking antithrombotic agents did not undergo the sealing method, 36 patients discontinued antithrombotic agents, and 724 patients had not received antithrombotic therapy.Results. Delayed bleeding rates were 3.8% (4/104) in the sealing group, 12.9% (9/70) in the nonsealing group, 8.3% (3/36) in the discontinuation group, and 4.6% (33/724) in the nonantithrombotic therapy group. Thus, the delayed bleeding rate was significantly lower in the sealing group than in the nonsealing group and comparable to that in the nonantithrombotic therapy group.Conclusions. This PGA felt and fibrin glue sealing method might become a promising post-ESD bleeding prevention method in patients taking antithrombotic agents (UMIN000013990,UMIN000013993).

scholarly journals Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Western Center: Analysis of Outcomes and Safety Profile

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
João Santos-Antunes ◽  
Margarida Marques ◽  
Rui Morais ◽  
Fátima Carneiro ◽  
Guilherme Macedo
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Lesions

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (<i>n</i> = 24) and rectum (<i>n</i> = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.

scholarly journals Clinical Practice of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Neoplasms by a Colonoscopist with Limited Gastric Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Hsin Hsu ◽  
Meng-Shun Sun ◽  
Hoi-Wan Lo ◽  
Ching-Yang Tsai ◽  
Yu-Jou Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasms ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Limited Experience ◽  
Mean Size ◽  
Delayed Perforation ◽  
The Mean

Objectives. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early colorectal neoplasms is regarded as a difficult technique and should commence after receiving the experiences of ESD in the stomach. The implementation of colorectal ESD in countries where early gastric cancer is uncommon might therefore be difficult. The aim is to delineate the feasibility and the learning curve of colorectal ESD performed by a colonoscopist with limited experience of gastric ESD.Methods. The first fifty cases of colorectal ESD, which were performed by a single colonoscopist between July 2010 and April 2013, were enrolled.Results. The mean of age was 64 (±9.204) years with mean size of neoplasm at 33 (±12.63) mm. The mean of procedure time was 70.5 (±48.9) min. The rates ofen blocresection, R0 resection, and curative resection were 86%, 86%, and 82%, respectively. Three patients had immediate perforation, but no patient developed delayed perforation or delayed bleeding.Conclusion. Our result disclosed that it is feasible for colorectal ESD to be performed by a colonoscopist with little experience of gastric ESD through satisfactory training and adequate case selection.

scholarly journals The pocket-creation method may facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal sessile tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (08) ◽  
pp. E1021-E1030
Author(s):  
Takeshi Yamashina ◽  
Yoshikazu Hayashi ◽  
Hisashi Fukuda ◽  
Masahiro Okada ◽  
Takahito Takezawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Submucosal Fibrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Resecting large colorectal sessile tumors using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging because of severe submucosal fibrosis. Previously, we reported that ESD strategy using the pocket-creation method (PCM) is useful for large colorectal sessile tumors, but there are no large studies reporting the effectiveness and safety of the PCM for resection of large colorectal sessile tumors. Patients and methods This was a retrospective review of 90 large colorectal sessile tumors in 89 patients who underwent ESD in our institution. Large colorectal sessile tumors were defined as polypoid lesions 20 mm or more in diameter. We divided them into PCM (n = 40) and conventional method (CM) groups (n = 50). The primary outcome measure was en bloc resection. The inverse-probability-treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to adjust for selection bias. Results Both PCM and CM achieved high en bloc resection (100 % vs. 94 %, non-adjusted P = 0.25, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.19) and R0 resection rates (88 % vs. 78 %, non-adjusted P = 0.28, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.27). When PCM was used, the rate of pathologically negative vertical margins was significantly greater than with the CM (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.045). The dissection time was significantly shorter (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.025) and dissection speed faster (IPTW-adjusted P = 0.013) using the PCM than when the CM was used. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (intraprocedural perforation and delayed bleeding, IPTW-adjusted P = 0.68). Conclusion Although en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were similar, PCM significantly increased the rate of negative vertical margins with rapid dissection for treatment of large colorectal sessile tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document