Development of a Tailored Intervention to Promote Breast Cancer Screening among Immigrant Asian Women Residing in the US

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsu-Yin Wu
2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-587
Author(s):  
Mei-yu Yu, PhD ◽  
Amy D. Seetoo ◽  
Mo Qu

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Ishikawa ◽  
Kei Hirai ◽  
Hiroshi Saito ◽  
Jun Fukuyoshi ◽  
Akio Yonekura ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e229-e233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jananie C Perera ◽  
Vimukthini Peiris ◽  
Dakshitha P Wickramasinghe ◽  
Ishan De Zoysa

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1565-1565
Author(s):  
Thanyanan Reungwetwattana ◽  
Julian R. Molina ◽  
Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss

1565 Background: Understanding the prevalence of cancer screening in the US and the factors associated with its accessibility is important for public health promotion. Methods: The 2004 and 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Systems were used to ascertain cancer screening rates among populations indicated for each test by age, gender, and the American Cancer Society recommendation for cancer screenings [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or endoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, digital rectal examination (DRE) or prostate specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer screening, clinical breast examination (CBE) or mammogram for breast cancer screening, and Papanicolaou (Pap) test for cervical cancer screening]. Results: Over this period, CRC and breast cancer screening rates significantly increased (15.9%, 13.9%) while prostate and cervical cancer screening rates significantly decreased (1.2%, 5.2%). Race/ethnicity might be an influence in CRC and cervical cancer screening accessibility. Prostate cancer screening accessibility might be influenced by education and income. The older-aged populations (70-79, >79) had high prevalence of CRC, prostate and breast cancer screenings even though there is insufficient evidence for the benefits and harms of screenings in the older-aged group. Conclusions: The disparities in age, race/ethnicity, health insurance, education, employment, and income for the accession to cancer screening of the US population have decreased since 2004. The trajectory of increasing rates of CRC and breast cancer screenings should be maintained. To reverse the trend, the causes of the decreased rate of cervical cancer screening and the high rates of screenings in older-aged populations should, however, be further explored. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document