Effects of Monocropping Resistant and Suspectible Soybean Cultivars on Cyst Nematode Infested Soil 1

Crop Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 576-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. Hartwig ◽  
L. D. Young ◽  
N. Buehring
Nematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-121
Author(s):  
Luma A. Pedroso ◽  
Vicente P. Campos ◽  
Aline F. Barros ◽  
Julio C.P. Silva ◽  
Gustavo M. Assis ◽  
...  

Summary The cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, is a major pathogen of soybean in tropical regions, which demands novel sustainable management practices. In this work, the use of ethanol against H. glycines was evaluated as both a solution and a fumigant. On second-stage juveniles (J2) of H. glycines, ethanol at low concentration was more effective by direct dipping than by only fumigating the J2. Hatching was significantly reduced by direct dipping in ethanol solutions. Fumigation of H. glycines-infested soil with ethanol reduced infectivity by almost 100% and the number of eggs by about 67% at ethanol concentrations of 48% and 72%, respectively. Only the ethanol at 48% concentration significantly reduced the J2 lipid content, while J2 infectivity and the number of eggs were reduced by dipping at 6% ethanol. The J2 were internally altered by the ethanol solutions. Therefore, ethanol is toxic to H. glycines at low concentrations and affects its pathogenic behaviour rather than simply reducing the lipids.


1990 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 855-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Radcliffe ◽  
R. S. Hussey ◽  
R. W. McClendon

Crop Science ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 982-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Prabhu ◽  
V. N. Njiti ◽  
B. Bell‐Johnson ◽  
J. E. Johnson ◽  
M. E. Schmidt ◽  
...  

jpa ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Hanson ◽  
J. H. Muir ◽  
P. M. Sims ◽  
J. K. Boon

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn M. J Winter ◽  
Istvan Rajcan ◽  
Barry J Shelp

Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is the primary pest responsible for yield losses of Glycine max. Management of SCN remains difficult in commercial soybean production due to the length of its biological cycle, frequent changes in population virulence, and ease of spread via infested soil. Effective management relies on crop rotation in combination with resistant cultivars, which have been derived from a limited germplasm base. Breeding for SCN resistance in soybean is difficult due to the quantitative nature of the trait, genetic variation within SCN populations, time required for phenotyping experimental soybean lines, and environmental factors affecting SCN reproduction. Quantitative trait loci associated with SCN resistance have been identified on 17 of the 20 soybean linkage groups, explaining 1–91% of the total phenotypic variation. Two major resistance genes, rhg 1 and Rhg 4, have been identified on linkage groups G and A2, respectively. Several minor resistance genes have been identified, but their importance varies with germplasm source and nematode race. Enhancement of SCN resistance in G. max may be achieved by interspecific hybridization with G. soja, the wild ancestor, or by engineering plants with candidate resistance genes such as Hs1pro-1. Key words: Genetic engineering, Glycine soja, soybean cyst nematode, molecular markers, resistance


Plant Disease ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 91 (11) ◽  
pp. 1473-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa G. Mitchum ◽  
J. Allen Wrather ◽  
Robert D. Heinz ◽  
J. Grover Shannon ◽  
Gene Danekas

The soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, is a serious economic threat to soybean producers in Missouri. Periodic monitoring for the presence, population densities, and virulence phenotypes of H. glycines is essential for determining crop losses and devising management strategies implementing the use of resistant cultivars. A survey using area-frame sampling was conducted to determine the distribution and virulence phenotypes of H. glycines in Missouri during 2005. Two samples from each of 125 fields representing eight geographical regions of Missouri were collected; 243 samples were processed for extraction of cysts and eggs. In all, 49% of samples had detectable cyst nematode populations, which ranged from 138 to 85,250 eggs per 250 cm3 of soil. Race and H. glycines type tests were conducted on populations from 45 samples. Nearly 80% of the populations that were tested, irrespective of the region, were virulent on the indicator line plant introduction (PI) 88788, which is the source of resistance for most H. glycines-resistant cultivars. More than 70% of populations could reproduce on the indicator lines PI 88788, PI 209332, and PI 548316 (Cloud), indicating that soybean cultivars with resistance derived from these sources need to be carefully monitored and used only in rotation with nonhost crops and soybean cultivars with resistance from other sources. Approximately one-third of the populations, primarily in the southern regions of Missouri, could reproduce on PI 548402 (Peking), another common source of resistance. Fewer than 10% of the populations could reproduce on PI 90763, PI 437654, PI 89772, or PI 438489B, suggesting that these sources of resistance should be used in soybean breeding programs to develop H. glycines-resistant soybean cultivars.


Plant Disease ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 773-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Širca ◽  
B. Geric Stare ◽  
P. Strajnar ◽  
G. Urek ◽  
I. Miklic Lautar

The potato cyst nematodes (PCN) Globodera rostochiensis (Woll.) Behrens and G. pallida (Stone) Behrens are considered the most important nematode threat to potato production worldwide, and they are subject to strict quarantine regulations in many countries. The first report of the PCN in Slovenia dates back to 1971, when a single cyst of G. rostochiensis was detected (3). In the last decade, G. rostochiensis was detected several times, mainly in the central and northern parts of the country (2). Interceptions of G. pallida in imported consignments of ware potato were made several times, but had not been detected in soil in Slovenia. Therefore, the country was declared as a protected zone for G. pallida in the European Union by the national authorities in 2003. During the official PCN systematic survey in autumn 2011, the pale potato cyst nematode, G. pallida, was found in a soil sample. Two viable cysts were extracted and the nematode species was identified. The posterior part of the cysts containing eggs and juveniles were used for morphometrical analysis, while the anterior parts were used for DNA extraction and molecular analyses. The ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was amplified using ITS5 and PITSp4 primers and detected in real-time PCR using ABI7500 (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA,) (1). Also, the ribosomal DNA region that extends from the 3′ end of the 18S ribosomal subunit and includes all of ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2, to the 5′ end of the 28S ribosomal subunit, was used to generate a DNA sequence. The sequence obtained was compared with those from several Globodera species, revealing unequivocal similarity to G. pallida. The infested soil sample originated from a ware potato field near Ivancna Gorica, central Slovenia. Subsequently, an additional 69 samples were taken from the surroundings and viable G. pallida cysts were found in another five samples taken from two neighboring fields (one of grassland and the other of clover). Three fields, totaling 1.9 ha, were declared as G. pallida-infested. The eradication of the pest will take place by enforcing strict phytosanitary measures. Ware potatoes originating from areas where the pests occur is considered to be the most probable pathway for the introduction of G. pallida in Slovenia. A ware potato processing facility is situated in very close proximity to the infested fields. The waste waters from potato tuber washing were discharging onto the grassland, never used for potato or other field crop production in which the G. pallida infestation was found. The facility processes imported ware potato from several European and non-European countries. This case demonstrates that ware potato may pose a serious risk for the introduction of such pests, and should be therefore subjected to more intensive phytosanitary inspection. References: (1) J. Bacic et al. Russ. J. Nematol. 16:63, 2008. (2) S. Širca et al. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 49:361, 2010. (3) G. Urek et al. Nematology 5:391, 2003.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document