scholarly journals Innovation, Competition, and Investment Timing

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joril Maeland ◽  
Yrjo Koskinen
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yrjö Koskinen ◽  
Joril Maeland

AbstractIn our model multiple innovators compete against each other by submitting investment proposals to an investor. The investor chooses the least expensive proposal and the timing of the investment. Innovators privately learn the cost of investing. The investor has to compensate the innovators for their reservation wages, but competition makes screening easier and helps to erode innovators’ informational rents. Consequently, competition leads to faster innovation, because the investor has less need to delay expensive investments. With an endogenous number of innovators investment timing becomes first best.Received June 5, 2013; accepted February 26, 2016 by Editor Paolo Fulghieri.


2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (02) ◽  
pp. 271-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
RYUTA TAKASHIMA ◽  
MAKOTO GOTO ◽  
MOTOH TSUJIMURA

We consider an optimal investment problem when a firm such as an electric power company has the operational flexibility to expand and contract capacity with fixed cost. This problem is formulated as an impulse control problem combined with optimal stopping. Consequently, we obtain optimal investment timing, optimal capacity expansion and contraction timing, and the investment value. We also show investment, capacity expansion and contraction rule are influenced by the price volatility and the initial capacity is also influenced by the ratio between base-load plant and peak-load plant. In addition, we investigate how time lag between investment and operation influences the investment rule.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document