Privatized Companies, Golden Shares and Property Ownership in the Euro Crisis Era: A Discussion after Commission v. Greece

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Papadopoulos
CFA Magazine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-18
Author(s):  
Scott Wybranski

AKADEMIKA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-188
Author(s):  
Khozainul Ulum

Buying and selling transaction has always become an important means for people to obtain what they want. Due to the transaction, the transfer of property ownership from one person to another can occur legally. To guarantee the rights of individual engaged in the transaction, Islam has introduced the so-called  khiyar, namely the right of each individual to determine whether the transaction could be held or not. The khiyar in any buying and selling transaction is not but to solely embody the principle of 'an taradin, the willingness to involve in buying and selling transaction between sellers and buyers.


Author(s):  
C. Randall Henning

European governments, against their initial instincts, invited the International Monetary Fund to design financial rescue programs during the euro crisis in cooperation with the European Commission and European Central Bank. These institutions, known as the “troika,” constitute a regime complex in the parlance of international political economy. This book poses four questions about the regime complex for crisis finance in the euro area: Why did European governments choose this particular mix of institutions? What was the strategy of key member states in directing several institutions to collaborate on lending programs? Why did this arrangement endure despite severe conflicts among the institutions? Should the member states of the euro area “go it alone” by creating a European Monetary Fund? This chapter elaborates on these questions and provides an overview of the book.


Polar Record ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol J. Brown-Leonardi

ABSTRACTThe Deh Cho Dene have been negotiating territorial land since early European settlement. This paper argues that the changing needs of Deh Cho Dene society has changed their concept of property and this transformation has evolved with a responsibility to conserve cultural practice and ecological balance in Deh Cho Dene territorial lands. The article considers how the changing need of European society addresses property and ownership in the context of basic human rights and consumer interests. It uses the theories of Macpherson, Locke, and Marx to construct a model to understand the property relations that exist in the Deh Cho Dene region. Accordingly, the paper addresses oral narratives to give historical insight into the relations between neighbouring tribal groups and their understanding of territorial boundaries. An account of present day negotiations highlights the various initiatives taken to protect traditional interests and uphold historical claim to the territory. The negotiation of joint ventures and property ownership has evolved with concerns over ecological sustainability and the protection of a subsistence lifestyle, which is critical for the social and economic interests of Deh Cho Dene culture, and is closely connected to the land.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document