Venezuela's Imminent Restructuring and the Role Alter Ego Claims May Play in this Chavismo Saga

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Cooper ◽  
Boaz S. Morag
Keyword(s):  
1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 806-806
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-98
Author(s):  
Gérard Raulet
Keyword(s):  

Walter Benjamins »destruktiver Charakter«, sein alter ego, ist nicht so einsam, wie es scheinen mag, sondern hat im bürgerlichen Lager, in der Person eines eher konservativen Kulturkritikers und Verteidigers der auserlesensten Bildung, einen Doppelgänger – soweit dieser avantgardistische künstlerische Positionen vertritt. Und dieser Doppelgänger hat ebenfalls einen Doppelgänger: »Monsieur Teste«. Daß es zwischen Benjamin und Valéry zu einem solchen Refraktionsspiel kam, ist kein Zufall. Der Dialog mit Valéry geht bei Benjamin auf das Frühjahr 1925 zurück und bildet einen roten Faden, der in der Verstrickung von Avantgardismus und Kulturkritik am deutlichsten zutage tritt.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Benish

On May 18, 2020, the United States Supreme Court denied a request by the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and its state-owned oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA), to review the merits of Crystallex Int'l Corp. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In Crystallex, the Third Circuit affirmed a trial court's determination that PDVSA is the “alter ego” of Venezuela itself, thus permitting Crystallex to enforce a $1.4 billion judgment against Venezuela by attaching property held in PDVSA's name. Given the Supreme Court's decision to leave the Third Circuit's opinion undisturbed, Crystallex is a significant decision that may affect parties involved in transnational litigation for years to come—especially those pursuing or defending against U.S. enforcement proceedings involving the property of foreign states.


Dialogue ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-709
Author(s):  
R. E. Tully

This is the first volume in the Collected Papers which deals exclusively with Russell's non-technical writings and, chronologically, it is the immediate successor of volume 1. Volumes 2 through 7 cover roughly the same span of years as volume 12 (1902–1914) but are devoted to his technical writings on mathematics, logic and philosophy. Of this group, however, only volume 7 has so far been published. The contents of volume 12 are intended to show two contrasting sides of Russell's highly complex character: the contemplative (but nonacademic) side and the active. The latter is much easier to delineate and much more widely known. During 1904, Russell rose to defend traditional Liberal principles of free trade and to assail the British government's protectionist proposals for tariff reform. His various articles, book reviews, critiques and letters to editors are gathered here. Three years later, he campaigned for election to Parliament from Wimbledon as the Women's Suffrage candidate against a staunch anti-suffragist. The outcome was never in doubt, not even to Russell, since Wimbledon was a safe seat for the Conservatives, and in the end Russell lost by a margin greater than 3-to-l, but his fight had been vigorous and had managed to gain national attention.


2005 ◽  
Vol n<sup>o</sup> 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-78
Author(s):  
Claudine Attias-Donfut ◽  
François-Charles Wolff
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
João Carvalho ◽  

This paper presents two different, although related, approaches to the problem of the experience of the other person: E. Husserl’s phenomenology of intersubjectivity and E. Levinas’ ethics. I begin by (1) addressing the transcendental significance of the experience of intersubjectivity in the broader context of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. I then turn to (2) Husserl’s solution to the paradox of constituting the alter ego, identifying and elucidating the key‑concepts of his inquiry. I hold that throughout his analysis there is a dominant underlying meaning in which the alterity of the other person is progressively suppressed and, ultimately, elided. Finally, I discuss (3) the consequences of Husserl’s analysis of the other in light of Levinas’ ethics. I hold that Husserl’s claim that there is a fundamental difference between the experience of myself and my analogical experience of the other is the basis upon which Levinas’ develops a new concept of experience, not as perception but as encounter. Upon close reading, I claim that Levinas’ revision of the topic of alterity is, ultimately, a consequence of Husserl’s transcendental analysis of intersubjectivity.


2018 ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Alessandra Scappini

<p><strong>Riassunto</strong> Leonor Fini (Trieste, 1987 - Parigi, 1996) è una pittrice e scrittrice singolare che lavora nel tempo delle avanguardie storiche avvicinandosi all’<em>entourage</em> del surrealismo a Parigi. Il senso del meraviglioso e l’onnipotenza del desiderio che emergono dalle sue storie e dalle sue opere pittoriche sono aspetti comuni all’avanguardia, anche se non ha mai aderito al movimento. Le figure femminili, gli animali totemici e gli ibridi dipinti o descritti sono simbolici e riflettono il suo gusto per il metamorfismo proprio di una personalità e di un <em>alter ego</em> prossimi all’universo fantastico.</p><p><strong>Abstract</strong> Leonor Fini (Trieste, 1987 - Paris, 1996) is a singular woman painter and writer who works in the period of historical avant-gardes approaching the <em>entourage </em>of surrealism in Paris. The sense of the marvelous and the omnipotence of desire that emerge from her stories and her pictorial works are common aspects in the vanguard, even if she has never joined the movement. The female figures, totemic animals and hybrids painted or described are symbolic and reflect her taste for the metamorphism of a personality and an <em>alter ego</em> close to the fantastic universe.</p><p><strong>Keywords  </strong>Leonor Fini, surrealism, desire, marvelous, fantastic.</p>


1951 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-210
Author(s):  
Klemens von Klemperer

National Bolshevism represents a chapter in German-Russian relations since the First World War. As a policy advocating an Eastern orientation for Germany it is a most puzzling and at this day a very acute phenomenon. To those educated to observe the spectrum of political opinions in terms of Right and Left, with the extreme Right at the opposite end from the extreme Left, National Bolshevism seems a paradox. It suggests the meeting of extremes. More concretely the term stands for a rapprochement between German nationalism and Russian Communism. The story of National Bolshevism is the story of two “strange bedfellows.”In the effort to comprehend this upsetting pattern it might be recalled that modern psychology has in many ways succeeded in breaking down our traditional thinking about human relations. Love, for example, has lost its meaning apart from hate, which has become its alter ego. We might be tempted to translate this finding into political terms, and National Bolshevism would appear as an example of a political love-hate relationship. It might also be suggested that the further we get from the origins and die more insight we gain into die workings of die two twentieth century extremes — Fascism and Communism — the more we are struck by dieir affinities. We grant diat Fascism is nodiing more dian “doctrineless dynamism,” whereas Communism goes back to die solid doctrinaire structure of Marxism. And even through European history since 1917 often threatened to lead up to an ultimate conflict between Fascism and Communism, die “transmutation” through which Marxism has gone in modern Russia has brought it ironically close to Fascism. It has become increasingly evident that die fight between die two was a mere sham battle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document