scholarly journals Egg consumption and cardiovascular disease among diabetic individuals: a systematic review of the literature

Author(s):  
Nga L. Tran ◽  
Leila Barraj ◽  
Jacqueline Heilman ◽  
Carolyn Scrafford
BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier ◽  
Siyu Chen ◽  
Yanping Li ◽  
Amanda L Schwab ◽  
Meir J Stampfer ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate the association between egg intake and cardiovascular disease risk among women and men in the United States, and to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Design Prospective cohort study, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Setting Nurses’ Health Study (NHS, 1980-2012), NHS II (1991-2013), Health Professionals’ Follow-Up Study (HPFS, 1986-2012). Participants Cohort analyses included 83 349 women from NHS, 90 214 women from NHS II, and 42 055 men from HPFS who were free of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer at baseline. Main outcome measures Incident cardiovascular disease, which included non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke. Results Over up to 32 years of follow-up (>5.54 million person years), 14 806 participants with incident cardiovascular disease were identified in the three cohorts. Participants with a higher egg intake had a higher body mass index, were less likely to be treated with statins, and consumed more red meats. Most people consumed between one and less than five eggs per week. In the pooled multivariable analysis, consumption of at least one egg per day was not associated with incident cardiovascular disease risk after adjustment for updated lifestyle and dietary factors associated with egg intake (hazard ratio for at least one egg per day v less than one egg per month 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.05). In the updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (33 risk estimates, 1 720 108 participants, 139 195 cardiovascular disease events), an increase of one egg per day was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk (pooled relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03, I 2 =62.3%). Results were similar for coronary heart disease (21 risk estimates, 1 411 261 participants, 59 713 coronary heart disease events; 0.96, 0.91 to 1.03, I 2 =38.2%), and stroke (22 risk estimates, 1 059 315 participants, 53 617 stroke events; 0.99, 0.91 to 1.07, I 2 =71.5%). In analyses stratified by geographical location (P for interaction=0.07), no association was found between egg consumption and cardiovascular disease risk among US cohorts (1.01, 0.96 to 1.06, I 2 =30.8%) or European cohorts (1.05, 0.92 to 1.19, I 2 =64.7%), but an inverse association was seen in Asian cohorts (0.92, 0.85 to 0.99, I 2 =44.8%). Conclusions Results from the three cohorts and from the updated meta-analysis show that moderate egg consumption (up to one egg per day) is not associated with cardiovascular disease risk overall, and is associated with potentially lower cardiovascular disease risk in Asian populations. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019129650.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Wabnitz ◽  
Cheryl Bushnell

Objective The objective of this article is to review the literature relating migraine, cardiovascular disease, and stroke during pregnancy in order to better define the relationship between migraines and vascular disease. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the literature using Medline and Cochrane Review with the following search terms: migraine AND pregnancy and vascular disease OR myocardial infarction OR heart disease OR stroke OR cerebrovascular disease OR hypertension in pregnancy. We also reviewed the bibliographies of papers identified in this search to obtain additional relevant studies. Results Of the 219 papers obtained with the primary search, we found 17 that were topically relevant. Altogether, there is an increased risk both of gestational hypertension (OR range from 1.23 to 1.68) and preeclampsia (OR range 1.08 to 3.5) in migraineurs compared to nonmigraineurs. In addition, there is an association between an increased risk of ischemic stroke in pregnancy (OR range 7.9 to 30.7), particularly with active migraine. There is also an association between migraine and increased risk of acute myocardial infarction and heart disease (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.7, 14.2), and thromboembolic events during pregnancy (deep venous thrombosis OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3, 4.2 and pulmonary embolus OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.7, 5.6). Conclusion In this review, we summarized the association between migraine and risk of vascular disease during pregnancy, based on the available literature. Given the limited amount of data, more research on these associations is needed to determine which women with migraine may be at risk while pregnant.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imtiaz Salim ◽  
Jassim Al Suwaidi ◽  
Wissam Ghadban ◽  
Hani Alkilani ◽  
Amar M. Salam

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ghulam ◽  
M Bonaccio ◽  
A Gialluisi ◽  
F Gianfagna ◽  
L Iacoviello

Abstract Background Psychosocial resilience is the capacity of responding positively to stressful events in life. We performed a systematic review of the literature to find whether resilience has any protective effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD) or mortality. Methods We searched Pubmed and Prospero systematic Review Registry using terms resilience, psychological or resiliency or resilience or resilient or hardiness, cardiovascular or stroke or or myocardial infarction or CVD or mortality or hospitalization. The references of each included paper were also searched for relevant studies. Longitudinal studies conducted on all populations, in English, with no time restriction were searched. They were included in the review if they examined resilience as primary exposition, and mortality for all causes, mortality for CVD, CVD events and hospitalization as outcomes and if they were longitudinal. Results The search identified 1,471 studies, of which only 8 were retained and fully examined based on the study design reported in the abstract, and 3 met all the inclusion criteria. Two studies on 237,879 young Swedish men showed that lower resilience compared with the highest (scores from an interview) resulted associated with both coronary heart disease (HR = 2.61, 95%CI:2.52-2.70) and stroke risk (HR = 1.54, 1.40-1.70) in adulthood (follow up 23 yrs). A third study on 2,765 postmenopausal Afro-American women showed that a modified Brief Resilience Scale was not associated with CVDs (lowest vs highest quartile, HR = 0.95, 95%CI:0.63-1.42; follow up 12.5 yrs). Conclusions There is not sufficient evidence of a protective attitude of resilience towards CVD: only 3 studies were eligible, with heterogeneity in sample size, exposures to stressors and scales used to measure resilience, and with resilience data available only at baseline. Further studies are necessary, since resilience is a powerful concept, and, if proved protective, might be improved in populations to ameliorate CV health. Key messages No clear association between resilience and CVD risk has been shown in literature. This is the first systematic review on the topic and further research is needed to broaden our understanding of the relation between resilience and CVD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document