scholarly journals Pulmonary Embolism after Relief of Urinary Obstruction

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumie Sakamoto ◽  
Sho Sasaki ◽  
Kazuhiro Okamura ◽  
Kiichiro Fuzisaki
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Urinary Obstruction

Abstract #860 Massive Pulmonary Embolism as the First Presentation of a Patient with Acromegaly

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 204-205
Author(s):  
Wajiha Gul ◽  
Mehdi Errayes ◽  
Buthaina Alowainati
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Massive Pulmonary Embolism

D-Dimer and CT Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
DAMIAN MCNAMARA
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Rule Out

An approach to the surgical treatment of pulmonary embolism

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Frater
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Surgical Treatment

Pulmonary embolism shock. Physiologic basis of a bedside screening test

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 196 (9) ◽  
pp. 751-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. R. Del Guercio
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Screening Test

Tissue plasminogen activator as a novel diagnostic aid in acute pulmonary embolism

VASA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 450-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Flores ◽  
Ángel García-Avello ◽  
Esther Alonso ◽  
Antonio Ruíz ◽  
Olga Navarrete ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Diagnostic Utility ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen ◽  
D Dimer

Background: We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared it with an ELISA D-dimer (VIDAS D-dimer) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients and methods: We studied 127 consecutive outpatients with clinically suspected PE. The diagnosis of PE was based on a clinical probability pretest for PE and a strict protocol of imaging studies. A plasma sample to measure the levels of tPA and D-dimer was obtained at enrollment. Diagnostic accuracy for tPA and D-dimer was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the diagnostic utility of tPA with a cutoff of 8.5 ng/mL and D-dimer with a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, were calculated for PE diagnosis. Results: PE was confirmed in 41 patients (32 %). Areas under ROC curves were 0.86 for D-dimer and 0.71 for tPA. The sensitivity/negative predictive value for D-dimer using a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, and tPA using a cutoff of 8.5 ng/mL, were 95 % (95 % CI, 88–100 %)/95 % (95 % CI, 88–100 %) and 95 % (95 % CI, 88–100 %)/94 %), respectively. The diagnostic utility to exclude PE was 28.3 % (95 % CI, 21–37 %) for D-dimer and 24.4 % (95 % CI, 17–33 %) for tPA. Conclusions: The tPA with a cutoff of 8.5 ng/mL has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for exclusion of PE, similar to those observed for the VIDAS D-dimer with a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, although the diagnostic utility was slightly higher for the D-dimer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document