The Future of Organ Donation and Transplantation: 2018 and Beyond

Author(s):  
Robert S.D. Higgins
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 922-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Mills ◽  
Julia H. Felsenheld ◽  
Zoe P. Berman ◽  
Allyson R. Alfonso ◽  
Gustave K. Diep ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 349 (9068) ◽  
pp. 1821
Author(s):  
Bruno Simini
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 616-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
F G Miller
Keyword(s):  

Probacja ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 115-128
Author(s):  
Konrad Burdziak

The text verifies the hypotheses that exploiting the human tendency to be consistent and introducing appropriate legal solutions can increase organ donation. The considerations found that there are arguments for the status quo bias (the tendency to be consistent) exists and affects humans. Concurrently, there are multiple rational psychological justifications for this kind of occurrences. Thus, the status quo bias can be exploited for increasing the organ donation, imposing on a person the decision regarding being willing to become an organ donor after their death or not, and count on this person not changing their decision in the future due to the tendency to be consistent. In Poland, such a solution could be introduced by adding the 7th item to the Article 11 section 1 of the Act on Vehicle Operators with the following wording: “declared that they agree or not to the removal of cells, tissues or organs from their corpses for transplantation, or the removal of cells and tissues for transplanting them into another person. The declaration may be changed at any time.”


1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-173
Author(s):  
Gregory T Armstrong

Answers to the question about consent for organ donation on the Queensland Transport Driver's Licence Database were reviewed to determine if age is an indicator of willingness to donate. As of November 1994, the database contained records on 1,969,382 persons (54% male, 46% female), accounting for 86.7% of the population 17 years of age or older. Fifty-four percent had answered yes to the question; 46% had indicated no or had not answered. The data were divided into three groups, males only, females only, and males plus females, and then sub-grouped by age. The number of subjects who had not answered the question was included in the number who had answered no. In the males-plus-females group, the percentage of yes answers by age remained relatively constant (56%–62%) for persons 17 to 49 years old but decreased to 39% for persons 70 years old. The data for males only and females only showed a similar decrease. Slightly more females than males had answered yes among persons 17 to 49 years old (mean difference, 5%; range, 1%–8%). This difference decreased with age. A higher willingness to donate in the younger age groups may augur well for the future. The data indicate that more attention must be given to persons 50 years of age and older to increase their awareness of their ability to donate.


2013 ◽  
Vol 369 (14) ◽  
pp. 1287-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Truog ◽  
Franklin G. Miller ◽  
Scott D. Halpern

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document