scholarly journals Telemonitoring Versus Usual Care for Elderly Patients With Heart Failure Discharged From the Hospital in the United States: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinchan Jiang ◽  
Jiaqi Yao ◽  
Joyce HS You
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Hospitalization Cost

BACKGROUND Telemonitoring-guided interventional management reduces the need for hospitalization and mortality of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of usual care with and without telemonitoring-guided management in patients with CHF discharged from the hospital, from the perspective of US health care providers. METHODS A lifelong Markov model was designed to estimate outcomes of (1) usual care alone for all postdischarge patients with CHF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class I-IV), (2) usual care and telemonitoring for all postdischarge patients with CHF, (3) usual care for all postdischarge patients with CHF and telemonitoring for patients with NYHA class III to IV, and (4) usual care for all postdischarge patients with CHF plus telemonitoring for patients with NYHA class II to IV. Model inputs were derived from the literature and public data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of model. The primary outcomes were total direct medical cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS In the base case analysis, universal telemonitoring group gained the highest QALYs (6.2967 QALYs), followed by the telemonitoring for NYHA class II to IV group (6.2960 QALYs), the telemonitoring for NYHA class III to IV group (6.2450 QALYs), and the universal usual care group (6.1530 QALYs). ICERs of the telemonitoring for NYHA class III to IV group (US $35,393 per QALY) and the telemonitoring for NYHA class II to IV group (US $38,261 per QALY) were lower than the ICER of the universal telemonitoring group (US $100,458 per QALY). One-way sensitivity analysis identified five critical parameters: odds ratio of hospitalization for telemonitoring versus usual care, hazard ratio of all-cause mortality for telemonitoring versus usual care, CHF hospitalization cost and monthly outpatient costs for NYHA class I, and CHF hospitalization cost for NYHA class II. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, probabilities of the universal telemonitoring, telemonitoring for NYHA class II to IV, telemonitoring for NYHA class III to IV, and universal usual care groups to be accepted as cost-effective at US $50,000 per QALY were 2.76%, 76.31%, 18.6%, and 2.33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Usual care for all discharged patients with CHF plus telemonitoring-guided management for NYHA class II to IV patients appears to be the preferred cost-effective strategy.

scholarly journals Telemonitoring Versus Usual Care for Elderly Patients With Heart Failure Discharged From the Hospital in the United States: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

10.2196/17846 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e17846
Author(s):  
Xinchan Jiang ◽  
Jiaqi Yao ◽  
Joyce HS You
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Hospitalization Cost

Background Telemonitoring-guided interventional management reduces the need for hospitalization and mortality of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Objective This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of usual care with and without telemonitoring-guided management in patients with CHF discharged from the hospital, from the perspective of US health care providers. Methods A lifelong Markov model was designed to estimate outcomes of (1) usual care alone for all postdischarge patients with CHF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class I-IV), (2) usual care and telemonitoring for all postdischarge patients with CHF, (3) usual care for all postdischarge patients with CHF and telemonitoring for patients with NYHA class III to IV, and (4) usual care for all postdischarge patients with CHF plus telemonitoring for patients with NYHA class II to IV. Model inputs were derived from the literature and public data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of model. The primary outcomes were total direct medical cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results In the base case analysis, universal telemonitoring group gained the highest QALYs (6.2967 QALYs), followed by the telemonitoring for NYHA class II to IV group (6.2960 QALYs), the telemonitoring for NYHA class III to IV group (6.2450 QALYs), and the universal usual care group (6.1530 QALYs). ICERs of the telemonitoring for NYHA class III to IV group (US $35,393 per QALY) and the telemonitoring for NYHA class II to IV group (US $38,261 per QALY) were lower than the ICER of the universal telemonitoring group (US $100,458 per QALY). One-way sensitivity analysis identified five critical parameters: odds ratio of hospitalization for telemonitoring versus usual care, hazard ratio of all-cause mortality for telemonitoring versus usual care, CHF hospitalization cost and monthly outpatient costs for NYHA class I, and CHF hospitalization cost for NYHA class II. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, probabilities of the universal telemonitoring, telemonitoring for NYHA class II to IV, telemonitoring for NYHA class III to IV, and universal usual care groups to be accepted as cost-effective at US $50,000 per QALY were 2.76%, 76.31%, 18.6%, and 2.33%, respectively. Conclusions Usual care for all discharged patients with CHF plus telemonitoring-guided management for NYHA class II to IV patients appears to be the preferred cost-effective strategy.

scholarly journals Outcome of Albumin Infusion in Heart Failure Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
Ashaduzzaman Talukder ◽  
Mohamed Mausool Siraj ◽  
Md Noornabi Khondokar ◽  
SM Ahsan Habib ◽  
Md Abu Salim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Serum Albumin ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Albumin Infusion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Class Iv

Background: Heart Failure (HF) is a major public health burden worldwide. Approximately 5 million Americans, 0.4–2% of the general European population and over 23 million people worldwide are living with heart failure. Like few other chronic disease, low serum albumin is common in patients with heart failure (HF). However, very few studies evaluated the outcome of albumin infusion in different stages of HF. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the outcome of albumin infusion in heart failure patients. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study. A total of 50 cases of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and NYHA class III or IV with serum albumin level <2.5g/dl who were admitted in CCUwere selected by purposive sampling, from September 2017 to August 2018. 100ml of 20% albumin was infused and serum albumin was measured after 3 days. Then the patients were divided into two groups, Patients who failed to attain serum albumin of 3g/dl(Group A) or Patients who attained serum albumin of ≥3g/dl (Group B). Analysis and comparison for symptomatic improvement of heart failure by NHYA classification and LVEF was done at 10th day after infusion between group A and B. Result: Among the 50 patients, mean age of patients was 53.64 ± 13.44 years (age range: 26-84 years) with a male-female ratio of 3:2 (60%-male vs 40%- female). Majority patients were previously re-admitted at least two times (40%), 28% were re-admitted once, 16% were re-admitted three times and 4% were re-admitted for four times. Of all, 56% patients presented NYHA class IV and AHA stage D heart failure (56%) and 44% patients presented with NYHA class III and AHA stage C. At day 10 follow up following albumin infusion, overall frequency of following ten days of albumin therapy, in group B, 8 patients (72.7%) among Class III improved to Class I and 3 patients (27.3%) improved to class II. Also, 7 patients (50%), 5 patients (35.7%) and 2 patients (14.3%) among class IV improved to respectively class I, class II and class III. In group A, 3 patients (27.3%) among class III improve to class II and 8 patients (72.7%) remain in class III. Also, 2 patients (14.3%), 5 Patients (35.7%) and 7 patients (50%) among class IV improve to respectively class I, class II and class III. Moreover, statistically significant improvement was noted in ejection fraction of patents irrespective of initial class of heart failure (p<0.001) in group B patients compare to group A (p<0.09). Conclusion: In this study, the improvement of heart failure was more in patients who attained albumin level of ≥3g/dl.Therefore, in can be concluded that albumin infusion improves both subjective and objective improvement of patients with heart failure. University Heart Journal Vol. 15, No. 2, Jul 2019; 47-53

scholarly journals Potential cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring program for heart failure patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinchan Jiang ◽  
Jiaqi Yao ◽  
Joyce You
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Healthcare Provider ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Effective Strategy ◽  
Cost Effective Strategy

BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused patients to avoid seeking medical care. Provision of telemonitoring (TM) program in addition to usual care (UC) demonstrated improved effectiveness in managing heart failure (HF) patients. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine the potential clinical and health economic outcomes of TM program for management of HF patients during COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of healthcare provider in Hong Kong. METHODS A Markov model was designed to compare outcomes of (1) UC plus TM (TM group) and (2) UC alone (UC group) in a hypothetical cohort of elderly HF patients in Hong Kong. Model outcome measures were direct medical cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the model assumptions and robustness of base-case results. RESULTS In base-case analysis, TM group gained higher QALYs (1.9007) at higher costs (USD15,888), when compared to UC group (1.8345 QALYs at USD15,603).Adopting 48,937 USD/QALY (1× gross domestic product per capita of Hong Kong) as the willingness-to-pay threshold, the TM group was accepted as a highly cost-effective strategy, with ICER of 4,292 USD/QALY. No threshold value was identified in deterministic sensitivity analysis. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, TM group was accepted as cost-effective in 99.22% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSIONS Adding TM program to usual care for HF patients appears to be a cost-effective strategy from the perspective of healthcare provider in Hong Kong.

Abstract 14647: Stress Echocardiography Predicts Heart Failure Progression and Alters Management Strategies in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan J Rowin ◽  
Barry J Maron ◽  
Iacopo Olivotto ◽  
Susan A Casey ◽  
Anna Arretini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Outflow Tract ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Outflow Obstruction ◽  
Heart Failure Progression

Background: One-third of HCM patients without left ventricular outflow tract obstruction under resting conditions have the propensity to develop an outflow gradient with physiologic exercise. However, the natural history and management implications of exercise-induced (i.e., provocable) obstruction is unresolved. Methods: We prospectively studied 533 consecutive HCM patients without outflow obstruction at rest (<30mmHg) who underwent a symptom limiting stress (exercise) echocardiogram to assess development of outflow obstruction following physiologic provocation and followed for 6.5 ± 2.0 years. Of the 533 patients, obstruction ≥ 30 mmHg was present following exercise in 262 patients (49%; provocable obstruction), and was absent both at rest and with exercise in 271 (51%; nonobstructive). Results: Over the follow-up period, 43 out of 220 (20%) HCM patients with provocable obstruction and baseline NYHA class I/II symptoms developed progressive limiting heart failure symptoms to class III/IV, compared to 24 of 249 (10%) nonobstructive patients. Rate of heart failure progression was significantly greater in patients with provocable obstruction vs. nonobstructive patients (3.1%/year vs. 1.5%/year; RR=2.0, 95% CI of 1.3-3.2; p=0.003). However, the vast majority of patients with provocable obstruction who developed advanced heart failure symptoms achieved substantial improvement in symptoms to class I / II following relief of obstruction with invasive septal reduction therapy (n=30/32; 94%). In comparison, the majority of nonobstructive patients who developed advanced heart failure remained in class III/IV (16/24;67%), including 10 (42%) currently listed for heart transplant. Conclusions: Stress (exercise) echocardiogram identifies physiological provocable outflow tract obstruction in HCM, and is a predictor of future risk for progressive heart failure (3.1%/year), in patients who become candidates for invasive septal reduction therapy. Therefore, exercise echocardiography should be considered in all HCM patients without obstruction under resting conditions.

scholarly journals Changes of myocardial fibrosis markers with the use of beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction of ischemic origin

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 3068
Author(s):  
O. A. Osipova ◽  
E. V. Gosteva ◽  
T. P. Golivets ◽  
O. N. Belousova ◽  
O. A. Zemlyansky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Myocardial Fibrosis ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Aim. To compare the effect of 12-month pharmacotherapy with a betablocker (BB) (bisoprolol and nebivolol) and a combination of BB with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (bisoprolol+eplerenone, nebivolol+eplerenone) on following fibrosis markers: matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 9 (MMP-1, MMP-9) and tissue inhibitor of MMP-1 (TIMP-1) in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) of ischemic origin.Material and methods. The study included 135 patients, including 40 (29,6%) women and 95 (70,4%) men aged 45-60 years (mean age, 53,1±5,7 years). Patients were randomized into subgroups based on pharmacotherapy with BB (bisoprolol or nebivolol) and their combination with eplerenone. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine the level of MMP-1, MMP-9, TIMP-1 (ng/ml) using the commercial test system “MMP-1 ELISA”, “MMP-9 ELISA”, “Human TIMP-1 ELISA” (“Bender Medsystems “, Austria).Results. In patients with HFmrEF of ischemic origin, there were following downward changes in serum level of myocardial fibrosis markers, depending on the therapy: bisoprolol  — MMP-1 decreased by 35% (p<0,01), MMP-9  — by 56,3% (p<0,001), TIMP-1  — by 17,9% (p<0,01); nebivolol  — MMP-1 decreased by 45% (p<0,001), MMP-9  — by 57,1% (p<0,001), TIMP-1  — by 30,1% (p<0,01); combination of bisoprolol with eplerenone  — MMP-1 decreased by 43% (p<0,001), MMP-9  — by 51,2% (p<0,001), TIMP-1  — by 25,1% (p<0,01); combination of nebivolol with eplerenone  — MMP-1 decreased by 53% (p<0,001), MMP-9 — by 64,3% (p<0,001), TIMP-1 — by 39% (p<0,01). In patients with NYHA class I HFmrEF after 12-month therapy, the decrease in MMP-1 level was 39,9% (p<0,01), MMP-9  — 57,5% (p<0,001). In class II, the decrease in MMP-1 level was 47% (p<0,001), MMP-9 — 49,7% (p<0,001). A significant decrease in TIMP-1 level was revealed in patients with class I by 29% (p<0,01), in patients with class II by 27,1% (p<0,01) compared with the initial data.Conclusion. A significant decrease in the levels of myocardial fibrosis markers (MMP-1, MMP-9, TIMP-1) was demonstrated in patients with HFmrEF of ischemic origin receiving long-term pharmacotherapy. The most pronounced effect was determined in patients with NYHA class I HF.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 1006-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J V McMurray ◽  
David Trueman ◽  
Elizabeth Hancock ◽  
Martin R Cowie ◽  
Andrew Briggs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Cost

ObjectiveChronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) represents a major public health issue and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan (formerly LCZ696) compared with an ACE inhibitor (ACEI) (enalapril) in the treatment of HF-REF from the perspective of healthcare providers in the UK, Denmark and Colombia.MethodsA cost-utility analysis was performed based on data from a multinational, Phase III randomised controlled trial. A decision-analytic model was developed based on a series of regression models, which extrapolated health-related quality of life, hospitalisation rates and survival over a lifetime horizon. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).ResultsIn the UK, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for sacubitril/valsartan (using cardiovascular mortality) was £17 100 (€20 400) versus enalapril. In Denmark, the ICER for sacubitril/valsartan was Kr 174 000 (€22 600). In Colombia, the ICER was COP$39.5 million (€11 200) per QALY gained. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that results were most sensitive to the extrapolation of mortality, duration of treatment effect and time horizon, but were robust to other structural changes, with most scenarios associated with ICERs below the willingness-to-pay threshold for all three country settings. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested the probability that sacubitril/valsartan was cost-effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds was 68%–94% in the UK, 84% in Denmark and 95% in Colombia.ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that, in all three countries, sacubitril/valsartan is likely to be cost-effective compared with an ACEI (the current standard of care) in patients with HF-REF.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of Adding SGLT2 Inhibitors to Standard Treatment for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaohui Jiang ◽  
Rujie Zheng ◽  
Haiqiang Sang
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diabetes Status ◽  
Life Years

Objective: To evaluate the economics and effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin or empagliflozin to the standard treatment for heart failure (HF) for patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in China.Methods: A Markov model was developed to project the clinical and economic outcomes of adding dapagliflozin or empagliflozin to the standard treatment for 66-year-old patients with HFrEF. A cost-utility analysis was performed based mostly on data from the empagliflozin outcome trial in patients with chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (EMPEROR-Reduced) study and the dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse outcomes in heart failure (DAPA-HF) trial. The primary outcomes were measured via total and incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).Results: In China, compared to the standard treatment, although adding dapagliflozin to the standard treatment in the treatment of HFrEF was more expensive ($4,870.68 vs. $3,596.25), it was more cost-effective (3.87 QALYs vs. 3.64 QALYs), resulting in an ICER of $5,541.00 per QALY. Similarly, adding empagliflozin was more expensive ($5,021.93 vs. $4,118.86) but more cost-effective (3.66 QALYs vs. 3.53 QALYs), resulting in an ICER of $6,946.69 per QALY. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the model in identifying cardiovascular death as a significant driver of cost-effectiveness. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that when the willingness-to-pay was $11,008.07 per QALY, the probability of the addition of dapagliflozin or empagliflozin being cost-effective was 70.5 and 55.2%, respectively. A scenario analysis showed that the cost of hospitalization, diabetes status, and time horizon had a greater impact on ICER.Conclusion: Compared with standard treatments with or without empagliflozin, adding dapagliflozin to the standard treatment in the treatment of HFrEF in China was extremely cost-effective.

scholarly journals Economic evaluation of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiqiang SANG ◽  
Yaohui JIANG ◽  
Zhe WANG ◽  
Rujie ZHENG
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background: In 2020, sacubitril/valsartan(formerly LCZ696) will implement the new negotiated price of medical insurance in China, and the cost of treatment will be significantly reduced. The aim of study is to evaluate the economy of sacubitril/valsartan(SAC/VAL) compared with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) (enalapril) in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in China.Method: A Markov model was developed to project clinical and economic outcomes of SAC/VAL versus enalapril for 64-year-old patients with HFrEF over 10 years from the Chinese medical and health system perspective. A cost-utility analysis was performed mostly based on data from the PARADIGM trial. Other transition probability, costs, and utilities were obtained from published literature and public databases. The primary outcome were total and incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for SAC/VAL relative to enalapril. The model was verified the uncertainty using the sensitivity analysis furtherly.Results: Compared with enalapril, SAC/VAL cost more than enalapril (¥96532 vs. ¥34560) and was more cost-effective (4.6 QALYs vs. 4.3 QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ¥185720 per QALY gained for patients with HFrEF at a WTP threshold of ¥212676 per QALY. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the model, identifying the death on the SAC/VAL group as a significant drivers of the cost-effectiveness. At the national negotiation price (¥9.95 per 100mg), probability of SAC/VAL being cost-effective was about 53% at a WTP threshold of ¥212676 per QALY.Conclusion: SAC/VAL was associated with clinical benefit and may be cost-effective compared with an ACEI (the current standard of care) in patients with HFrEF.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Physical Activity in Heart Failure

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-279
Author(s):  
Mei-Kuei Tai ◽  
Janet C. Meininger ◽  
Lorraine Q. Frazier ◽  
Wenyaw Chan
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Ambulatory Blood Pressure ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Class I ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection

This observational study used repeated measures over 24 hr to investigate ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and physical activity (PA) profiles in community-based individuals with heart failure (HF). The aims were to (a) compare BP dipping and PA between two groups of HF patients with different functional statuses, and (b) determine whether the strength of the association between ambulatory BP and PA varies by functional status in HF. Ambulatory BP was measured every 30 min with a SpaceLabs 90207; a Basic Motionlogger actigraph was used to measure PA minute-by-minute. Fifty-six participants (54% female, age 66.96 ± 12.35 years) completed data collection. Functional status was based on New York Heart Association (NYHA) ratings. Twenty-seven patients had no limitation of PA (NYHA Class I HF), whereas 29 had some limitation of PA but no discomfort at rest (NYHA Class II or III HF). Patients with Class I HF had a significantly greater degree of BP dipping than those with Class II/III HF after controlling for left ventricular ejection fraction. In a mixed-model analysis, PA was significantly related to ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure. The strength of the association between PA and BP was not significantly different for the two groups of patients. These findings demonstrate differences between Class I and Class II/II HF in BP dipping status and ambulatory BP but not PA. Longitudinal research is recommended to improve understanding of the influence of disease progression on changes in 24-hr PA and BP profiles of patients with HF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document