Applying the Health Belief Model to Characterize Racial/Ethnic Differences in Digital Conversations Related to Depression Pre– and Mid–COVID-19 (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby Castilla-Puentes ◽  
Jacqueline Pesa ◽  
Caroline Brethenoux ◽  
Patrick Furey ◽  
Liliana Gil Valletta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Ethnic Differences ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Seeking Help ◽  
Key Drivers ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
Racial Ethnic

BACKGROUND The prevalence of depression symptoms in the United States is >3 times higher mid–COVID-19 versus pre-pandemic. Racial/ethnic differences in mindsets around depression and the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE To describe attitudes, mindsets, key drivers, and barriers related to depression pre– and mid–COVID-19 by race/ethnicity using digital conversations about depression mapped to health belief model (HBM) concepts. METHODS Advanced search, data extraction, and AI-powered tools were used to harvest, mine, and structure open-source digital conversations of US adults who engaged in conversations about depression pre– (February 1, 2019-February 29, 2020) and mid–COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020-November 1, 2020) across the internet. Natural language processing, text analytics, and social data mining were used to categorize conversations that included a self-identifier into racial/ethnic groups. Conversations were mapped to HBM concepts (ie, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy). Results are descriptive in nature. RESULTS Of 2.9 and 1.3 million relevant digital conversations pre– and mid–COVID-19, race/ethnicity was determined among 1.8 million (62%) and 979,000 (75%) conversations pre– and mid–COVID-19, respectively. Pre–COVID-19, 1.3 million conversations about depression occurred among non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), 227,200 among Black Americans (BA), 189,200 among Hispanics, and 86,800 among Asian Americans (AS). Mid–COVID-19, 736,100 conversations about depression occurred among NHW, 131,800 among BA, 78,300 among Hispanics, and 32,800 among AS. Conversations among all racial/ethnic groups had a negative tone, which increased pre– to mid–COVID-19; finding support from others was seen as a benefit among most groups. Hispanics had the highest rate of any racial/ethnic group of conversations showing an avoidant mindset toward their depression. Conversations related to external barriers to seeking treatment (eg, stigma, lack of support, and lack of resources) were generally more prevalent among Hispanics, BA, and AS than among NHW. Being able to benefit others and building a support system were key drivers to seeking help or treatment for all racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS Applying concepts of the HBM to data on digital conversation about depression allowed organization of the most frequent themes by race/ethnicity. Individuals of all groups came online to discuss their depression. There were considerable racial/ethnic differences in drivers and barriers to seeking help and treatment for depression pre– and mid–COVID-19. Generally, COVID-19 has made conversations about depression more negative, and with frequent discussions of barriers to seeking care. These data highlight opportunities for culturally competent and targeted approaches to address areas amenable to change that might impact the ability of people to ask for or receive mental health help, such as the constructs that comprise the HBM.

scholarly journals Trends in Cigar Use in the United States, 2002–2016: Diverging Trends by Race/Ethnicity

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 583-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea H Weinberger ◽  
Cristine D Delnevo ◽  
Jiaqi Zhu ◽  
Misato Gbedemah ◽  
Joun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Black Women ◽  
Ethnic Group ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Ethnic Differences ◽  
Mixed Race ◽  
The United States ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Racial Ethnic ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Introduction Although there are racial/ethnic differences in cigarette use, little is known about how non-cigarette tobacco use differs among racial/ethnic groups. This study investigated trends in cigar use from 2002 to 2016, by racial/ethnic group, in nationally representative US data. Methods Data were drawn from the 2002–2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health public use data files (total analytic sample n = 630 547 including 54 060 past-month cigar users). Linear time trends of past-month cigar use were examined by racial/ethnic group (Non-Hispanic [NH] White, NH Black, Hispanic, NH Other/Mixed Race/Ethnicity) using logistic regression models. Results In 2016, the prevalence of past-month cigar use was significantly higher among NH Black respondents than among other racial/ethnic groups (ps < .001). Cigar use was also higher among NH White respondents than among Hispanic and NH Other/Mixed Race/Ethnicity respondents. The year by racial/ethnic group interaction was significant (p < .001). Past-month cigar use decreased significantly from 2002 to 2016 among NH White and Hispanic respondents (ps = .001), whereas no change in prevalence was observed among NH Black (p = .779) and NH Other/Mixed Race/Ethnicity respondents (p = .152). Cigar use decreased for NH White men (p < .001) and did not change for NH White women (p = .884). Conversely, cigar use increased for NH Black women (p < .001) and did not change for NH Black men (p = .546). Conclusions Cigar use remains significantly more common among NH Black individuals in the United States and is not declining among NH Black and NH Other/Mixed Race/Ethnicity individuals over time, in contrast to declines among NH White and Hispanic individuals. Implications This study identified racial/ethnic differences in trends in past-month cigar use over 15 years among annual cross-sectional samples of US individuals. The highest prevalence of cigar use in 2016 was found among NH Black individuals. In addition, cigar use prevalence did not decline from 2002 to 2016 among NH Black and NH Other/Mixed Race/Ethnicity groups over time, in contrast to NH White and Hispanic groups. Further, cigar use increased over time for NH Black women. Targeted public health and clinical efforts may be needed to decrease the prevalence of cigar use, especially for NH Black individuals.

Appointment-Keeping Behavior in Adolescents: Factors Associated With Follow-up Appointment-Keeping

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Irwin ◽  
Susan G. Millstein ◽  
Jonathan M. Ellen
Keyword(s):  
Social Class ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Negative Outcomes ◽  
Appointment Keeping ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
The Health Belief Model ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Study objectives. To identify the sociodemographic and Health Belief Model predictors of follow-up appointment-keeping behavior. Design. Prospective observational study. Settings. General adolescent medical clinic. Patients and measurements. Sequential sample of 166 adolescents (aged 12 to 20 years, mean = 15.9 years) enrolled in the clinic. The population was 75% female; the racial-ethnic distribution of the sample was 37.9% black, 29.8% white, 11.2% Asian, 14.3% Hispanic, and 6.8% "other" background. Subjects' social class was primarily lower-middle (60.5%) and middle class (28.6%). A subsample was randomly assigned to be interviewed about their beliefs concerning their follow-up appointment and the constructs of the Health Belief Model. Results. Forty-eight percent of the total sample failed to keep their follow-up appointment. There was a significant positive correlation between social class and appointment keeping (F = 5.07; df = 5,110; P = .026). Neither race-ethnicity nor who made the appointment were found to be associated with follow-up appointment-keeping. The only construct of the Health Belief Model found to be significantly associated with appointment keeping was the number of potential negative outcomes resulting from noncompliance perceived by the subject (F = 6.85; df 1,74; P = .011). Conclusions. Clinicians must work with adolescents to improve their understanding of the potential negative outcomes associated with noncompliance to improve appointment-keeping behavior.

Abstract P306: Racial/Ethnic Differences In Self-reported Sedentary Time Are Related To Differential Risk For Prevalent Hypertension: NHANES 2011-2016

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Mattingly ◽  
Megan E Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Ethnic Differences ◽  
Cardiovascular Health ◽  
Sedentary Time ◽  
Lower Odds ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Introduction: Evidence suggests there are racial/ethnic differences in lifestyle behaviors that may affect cardiovascular health outcomes such as physical activity engagement, diet, and sleep duration. However, the literature on racial/ethnic differences in sedentary time (ST) and whether these differences may be related differentially to cardiovascular health is limited. The goals of this study are to investigate racial/ethnic differences in self-reported ST, and examine if the modifying effect of ST with race/ethnicity will be associated with hypertension (HTN) prevalence. Methods: Adults (N=15903, age ≥20 yrs) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2016 reported their race/ethnicity (Mexican American [MA], Other Hispanic [OH], non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], non-Hispanic Asian, Other or mixed race [OM]), ST on a typical day (median split at 6 hrs: Low vs. High ST), and history of physician diagnosed HTN (yes/no). Weighted logistic regression models were conducted to examine the association between race/ethnic groups and ST, and combined racial/ethnic-ST groups (reference group: NHW with Low ST) on HTN prevalence while controlling for age, sex, education, body mass index, smoking status, moderate-vigorous physical activity min/wk, and history of diabetes, cardiovascular (i.e., heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary heart disease) and kidney conditions. Results: There was a significant association between race/ethnic groups and ST (Wald F [5,43]=23.4, p <0.001) such that compared to NHW, MA (OR=.43, 95%CI:.36,.51) OH (OR=.51, 95%CI:.42,.62), and OM (OR=.71, 95%CI:.55,.91) had lower odds for High ST. Weighted percent of the sample with HTN was 32.6%. There was a significant effect of combined race by ST groups on HTN (Wald F [11,37] = 9.8, p <0.001). Compared to NHW with Low ST, MA (OR=.70, 95%CI: .54,.90) and OH (OR=.79, 95%CI: .64,.97) with Low ST had lower odds for HTN, whereas NHB with Low ST (OR=1.58, 95%CI: 1.34,1.87) and High ST (OR=1.76, 95%CI: 1.50,2.07) had increased odds of HTN. Conclusion: In a large national cohort, daily ST differed by race/ethnicity, and ST modified the association between race/ethnicity and odds for HTN such that compared to more active NHW, more active Hispanic groups had decreased odds for HTN, but NHB regardless of ST had increased risk for HTN. ST may be a key modifiable risk factor in addressing race/ethnic disparities in cardiovascular health.

Race/Ethnicity, Smoking Status, and Self-Generated Expected Outcomes from Smoking among Adolescents

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Irvin Vidrine ◽  
Cheryl B. Anderson ◽  
Kathryn I. Poliak ◽  
David W. Wetter
Keyword(s):  
African Americans ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Ethnic Differences ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Smoking Initiation ◽  
Outcome Expectancies ◽  
Current Smoking ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Racial Ethnic ◽  
Expected Outcomes

Racial/ethnic differences in adolescent smoking suggest that different factors may motivate smoking among various racial/ethnic groups. This study examined relations among race/ethnicity, self-generated smoking outcome expectancies, and smoking status. Our findings noted that current smoking was highest among Hispanics, whereas African Americans and Asians were least likely to ever smoke. African Americans were most likely to experiment but least likely to smoke currently. Five expectancies differed significantly by race/ethnicity: reduce tension, image, negative aesthetics, addiction, and cost. However, none were significant mediators or moderators. Racial/ethnic groups most susceptible to smoking initiation and with the highest rates of current smoking should be targeted for prevention and cessation. Research is needed to examine more thoroughly racial/ethnic differences in expectancies.

scholarly journals Racial/ethnic differences in health-related quality of life among Hawaii adult population

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunjung Lim ◽  
James Davis ◽  
Chathura Siriwardhana ◽  
Lovedhi Aggarwal ◽  
Allen Hixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Ethnic Differences ◽  
General Health ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
History Of ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Racial Ethnic

Abstract Background This study examined racial/ethnic differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among adults and identified variables associated with HRQOL by race/ethnicity. Methods This study was conducted under a cross-sectional design. We used the 2011–2016 Hawaii Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. HRQOL were assessed by four measures: self-rated general health, physically unhealthy days, mentally unhealthy days, and days with activity limitation. Distress was defined as fair/poor for general health and 14 days or more for each of the other three HRQOL measures. We conducted multivariable logistic regressions with variables guided by Anderson’s behavioral model on each distress measure by race/ethnicity. Results Among Hawaii adults, 30.4% were White, 20.9% Japanese, 16.8% Filipino, 14.6% Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI), 5.9% Chinese, 5.2% Hispanics, and 6.2% Other. We found significant racial/ethnic differences in the HRQOL measures. Compared to Whites, Filipinos, Japanese, NHPIs, and Hispanics showed higher distress rates in general health, while Filipinos and Japanese showed lower distress rates in the other HRQOL measures. Although no variables were consistently associated with all four HRQOL measures across all racial/ethnic groups, history of diabetes were significantly associated with general health across all racial/ethnic groups and history of depression was associated with at least three of the HRQOL measure across all racial/ethnic groups. Conclusions This study contributes to the literature on disparities in HRQOL and its association with other variables among diverse racial/ethnic subgroups. Knowing the common factors for HRQOL across different racial/ethnic groups and factors specific to different racial/ethnic groups will provide valuable information for identifying future public health priorities to improve quality of life and reduce health disparities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document