scholarly journals AN ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Author(s):  
KAMESWARAN R ◽  
PRAVEEN M. ◽  
KRISHNAVENI KANDASAMY ◽  
SAMBATHKUMAR R.

Objective: To an assessment of potential drug-drug interactions in hypertensive patients in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, Erode for a period of 8 mo. A sample of 480 patients was assessed for PDDIs using drug checker in Micromedex®-2.7. Results: A total of 430 patients were analyzed and it was found to be 396 (82.50%) hypertensive patients had PDDIs, and a sum total of 1160 PDDIs were observed. Potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) higher in female hypertensive patients [255 (64.39%)] compared to males. Incidences of PDDIs were found to be higher in the age group of 60-70 y were [177 (44.69%)] and incidences of interactions based on the duration of (4-6 d) hospital stays were 272 (68.68%). Moreover, 49.24% of patients were found to be prescribed with more than 7 drugs, with higher incidences of PDDIs. Some of the most common drug interacting pair was between aspirin and clopidogrel combination observed in 325 PDDIs in the major, with pharmacodynamics in nature. Conclusion: Clinical pharmacist ought to have the role of regular monitoring of drug therapy in identifying and preventing the medications that have the potential to cause drug-drug interactions, thereby minimizing the undesirable outcomes in drug medical care and improving the quality of care.

Author(s):  
Shailander Singh ◽  
Swetha K.

Background: Drug interaction occurs when presence of one drug affects the activity of another when, both are co-administered. 6-30% of adverse events (AEs) with significant hospitalizations or death are by drug-drug interactions(DDI). There is increased possibility to prevent the potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs), if their prevalence and pattern are determined accurately before their occurrence. Hence this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pDDIs in ICU patients at BRIMS tertiary care hospital, Bidar.Methods: This prospective observational study included 30 patients admitted in ICU of BRIMS hospital for >24hrs of either gender, aged >18yrs. The study was conducted for a period of 3 months. Data was collected from the case records of patients on the predesigned proforma. Potential drug-drug interactions were classified based on their severity and the risk of Potential drug-drug interactions was estimated by Lexicomp, inc.version; 3.0.1.drug interact android mobile application.Results: Out of 35 patients admitted in the ICU, 30 cases were included in the study. The mean age of study population was 56.3years. The study population was exposed to a total of 330 medicines during the hospital stay with an average of 11.7 drugs per patient. The prevalence of pDDI was 93.3% (28) with an average of 9.75 pDDI per patient. According to Lexicomp drug interact android mobile application majority (63%) of pDDI were found to be moderate in their severity, 67% belonged to type C risk.Conclusions: The study showed higher prevalence of pDDI among ICU patients due to the complexity of the pharmacotherapies administered.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 720-723
Author(s):  
Nandikol P Sunanda ◽  
Master S A ◽  
K Niyati Raj ◽  
G Sushen ◽  
M S Laxshmi

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-115
Author(s):  
Dharmveer Jajra ◽  
Sanjay Lodha ◽  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Diwan Singh Jakhar ◽  
Joginder Singh

Background: Heparin is a multifaceted compound with uses not only as an anticoagulant, but also as an anti-inflammatory, anti-allergenic, anti-histaminic, anti-serotonin, anti-proteolytic and neoangiogenic agent. The aim of the study was to study the effect of topical heparin in the management of burns in terms of morbidity, mortality & safety. Subjects and Methods: A hospital based RCT with total duration of 16 months from June, 2018 to September, 2019 with 100 patients (age between 15-45 years, burns from 20-60%, with less than 48 hours duration), randomly enrolled into 2 groups, after initial resuscitative measures, 50 cases receiving Topical Heparin treatment, 50 controls receiving conventional treatment (1% silver sulphadiazine) with i.v. antibiotics, after explaining the study objectives and taking informed written consent. Data analysis was performed using Epi Info software. Results: Patients treated with topical heparin experienced statistically significant (p<0.05) improved pain relief, rapid healing, lesser complications and reduced duration of hospital stays. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that topical heparin can improve clinical outcomes in the treatment of burn injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Sanjib Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Kaushik Mitra ◽  
Dipankar Bhaumik ◽  
Saibal Das

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) among patients admitted in a tertiary care hospital in India. Methods: This was anobservational and cross sectional study for 3 months. All the patients admitted in the general ward under Department of Medicine. Pre-structured proforma and patient’s charts were be used for data collection on the 2nd day of admission. For drug interactions, online ‘Medscape Drug Interaction Checker’ was used. Results: A total of 61 charts were screened. A total of 304 drugs with 57 different types were admitted to these patients (including all dosage forms and routes). The total number of pDDIs were 217, of them 69 were minor, 130 were significant and 18 were serious (including repetitions in different patients). There were 13 unique serious pDDIs. Conclusion: The incidence of pDDIs in our study was high. Controlled study to evaluate whether good clinical management of DDIs can reduce drug-related morbidity or mortality is needed. Keywords:Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), poly-medication, hospitalization, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics interactions.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e026923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Eckart ◽  
Stephanie Isabelle Hauser ◽  
Sebastian Haubitz ◽  
Tristan Struja ◽  
Alexander Kutz ◽  
...  

ObjectivesRecently, the Hospital Frailty Risk Score based on a derivation and validation study in the UK has been proposed as a low-cost, systematic screening tool to identify older, frail patients who are at a greater risk of adverse outcomes and for whom a frailty-attuned approach might be useful. We aimed to validate this Score in an independent cohort in Switzerland.DesignSecondary analysis of a prospective, observational study (TRIAGE study).SettingOne 600-bed tertiary care hospital in Aarau, Switzerland.ParticipantsConsecutive medical inpatients aged ≥75 years that presented to the emergency department or were electively admitted between October 2015 and April 2018.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was all-cause 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, functional impairment and quality of life measures. We used multivariate regression analyses.ResultsOf 4957 included patients, 3150 (63.5%) were classified as low risk, 1663 (33.5%) intermediate risk, and 144 (2.9%) high risk for frailty. Compared with the low-risk group, patients in the moderate risk and high-risk groups had increased risk for 30-day mortality (OR (OR) 2.53, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.06, p<0.001 and OR 4.40, 95% CI 2.94 to 6.57, p<0.001) with overall moderate discrimination (area under the ROC curve 0.66). The results remained robust after adjustment for important confounders. Similarly, we found longer length of hospital stay, more severe functional impairment and a lower quality of life in higher risk group patients.ConclusionOur data confirm the prognostic value of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to identify older, frail people at risk for mortality and adverse outcomes in an independent patient population.Trial registration numberNCT01768494; Post-results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document