scholarly journals Sorafenib treatment by Child–Pugh score in Latin American patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (31) ◽  
pp. 2511-2520
Author(s):  
Laura L de Guevara ◽  
Lucy Dagher ◽  
Vanessa MV Arruda ◽  
Keiko Nakajima ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: To evaluate sorafenib treatment in Latin American patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the real-world GIDEON study. Patients & methods: Sorafenib administration, safety and efficacy were analyzed by Child–Pugh status. Results: Of 90 evaluable patients (37% Child–Pugh A, 46% Child–Pugh B and 3% Child–Pugh C at study entry), 97% started sorafenib at 800 mg/day. Patients with Child–Pugh B7 had the longest median treatment duration of sorafenib (33.1 weeks). Sorafenib-related adverse events occurred in 58% of patients with Child–Pugh A (21% grade 3/4) and 46% with Child–Pugh B (7% grade 3/4). Conclusion: Sorafenib had a similar safety profile across patients with Child–Pugh A and B and is a treatment option for both groups.

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Naoshi Nishida ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

scholarly journals How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Gustavo Hideki Kawanami ◽  
Leopoldo Katsuda ◽  
Thiara Barcelos Rocha ◽  
Fabio da Silva Yamashiro ◽  
Leonardo Pelafsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment

Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

CTNI-59. A MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF CS-131 SEEDS EMBEDDED IN A COLLAGEN CARRIER TILE FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED AND RECURRENT OPERABLE INTRACRANIAL NEOPLASMS – TRIAL IN PROGRESS

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi74-vi74
Author(s):  
Erin Dunbar ◽  
David McCracken ◽  
adam nowlan ◽  
Clark Chen ◽  
Kathryn Dusenbery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Intracranial Neoplasms ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract BACKGROUND For patients with operable intracranial neoplasms, there are opportunities to augment local control beyond traditional methods, such as external beam radiation therapy. Brachytherapy, the implantation of radioactive sources into the resection cavity, can be useful in this setting by providing immediate initiation of radiation and limiting the exposure of surrounding normal tissue to radiation. Traditional intracranial brachytherapy has been limited by uneven dose distributions, complicated workflows, extended procedural times, cost of dedicated equipment, and frequent adverse events. To address these issues, a permanently implanted device with Cs-131 radiation seeds embedded in a bioresorbable collagen carrier tile (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies, Tempe, AZ USA) was developed. Described as surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT), it is FDA-cleared for use in newly-diagnosed malignant intracranial neoplasms and recurrent intracranial tumors, and has demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in early commercial use. The primary objectives of this multicenter, prospective, observational (phase IV) registry study are to evaluate “real-world” clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes that measure the safety and efficacy of STaRT using the GammaTile. METHODS Patients undergoing resection (R) of brain tumors with intra-operative GammaTile placement are eligible for enrollment. Planned sample size is 600 at up to 50 enrolling sites. First subject was enrolled 10/14/2020. Tumor pathology, overall survival, radiation- and surgery-related adverse events, patient- and provider-reported quality of life, serial MRIs, and timing of surgical bed and/or distant recurrence are collected. Powered primary endpoints for recurrent brain metastases, recurrent glioblastoma, and recurrent meningioma (surgical bed-progression free survival (PFS), overall survival, and PFS, respectively), compare STaRT to standard-of-care benchmarks. Results will be used to improve awareness and access to this treatment, benchmark clinical outcomes in the real-world setting, allow for comparisons to existing treatments, facilitate the design of future clinical trials, and contribute to the optimal sequencing of treatments for intracranial neoplasms.

The Role of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid as Second-Line Treatment Option in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Jun Park ◽  
Hyunho Kim ◽  
Kabsoo Shin ◽  
Tae Ho Hong ◽  
Ja Hee Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Nanoliposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundAccording to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who previously treated gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to hematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefit and toxicity of this regimen in a real-world setting. Herein, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure.MethodsWe conducted a single institution retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. ResultsFifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced any grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia (58.8%) and most non-hematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1-18.4).ConclusionsNal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, after gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Trial registration Retrospectively registered

Safety and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and low Karnofsky performance status: Results from the CheckMate 920 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Bradley Curtis Carthon ◽  
Jeffrey Yorio ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
Heidi Ann McKean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

315 Background: Combination therapy with nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has demonstrated long-term efficacy and tolerability for patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Most pivotal clinical trials in pts with aRCC have excluded pts with low Karnofsky performance status (KPS; < 70%). CheckMate 920 is a multi-arm, phase IIIb/IV, open-label clinical trial of NIVO+IPI treatment in pts enrolled in a community practice setting with aRCC and a high unmet medical need. We present safety and efficacy results for the cohort of pts with aRCC of any histology and KPS 50%–60% from CheckMate 920 (NCT02982954). Methods: Pts with previously untreated advanced/metastatic RCC and KPS 50%–60% received NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W × 4 doses followed by 480 mg NIVO Q4W for ≤ 2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 3 immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 (both per investigator). Exploratory endpoints included overall survival (OS). Results: Of 25 treated pts with KPS 50%–60%, 76% were men; median age was 67 years (range, 34–81). IMDC risk was favorable in 0%, intermediate in 32%, and poor in 68% of pts; 84% had clear cell and 16% had non-clear cell RCC histology. With a minimum follow-up of 25 months, median duration of therapy (95% CI) was 2.3 months (2.1–7.7) for NIVO and 2.1 months (2.1–2.1) for IPI. The median number of doses (range) received was 4 (1–27) for NIVO and 4 (1–4) for IPI; 76% of pts received ≥ 4 NIVO doses and 68% received all 4 IPI doses. The only grade 3–4 imAEs by category were hepatitis (4.0%) and adrenal insufficiency (4.0%). No grade 5 imAEs occurred. Overall, 4 (16%) pts discontinued due to any-grade adverse events (n = 1 each for elevated AST, malignant neoplasm progression, back pain, and acetabulum fracture). Of 18 evaluable pts, ORR was 33.3% (95% CI, 13.3–59.0); no pts had a complete response and 6 had partial response. Median time to objective response was 4.5 months (range, 2.5–24.7). Median duration of objective response was 20.6 months (range, 0.03+–24.2+). Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5–14.8). Median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI, 5.3–25.1). Conclusions: NIVO+IPI demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in pts with previously untreated aRCC and KPS 50%–60%. The combination was tolerated at a dose intensity similar to that observed in clinical trials conducted in pts with higher KPS (≥ 70%). These data support the value of NIVO+IPI in pts who may not be considered ideal candidates for this therapy and consequently may have limited treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT02982954 .

Retrospective Review of Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib in Advanced Osteosarcoma With Metastases After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanqing Li ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Lei Song ◽  
Qiuchi Ai ◽  
shuai zhang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Multimodal Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Common Drug ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Abstract To study and observe the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma with metastases. We retrospectively studied patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases who received anlotinib treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to April 2020. All patients had received standard multimodal therapies, before taking anlotinib. Therapeutic doses of anlotinib were 12 mg for adults and 10 mg for children and adolescents once a day for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a week of withdrawal. This 3-week cycle of treatment was continued until the tumor progressed rapidly or the patients failed to tolerate the side effects. Adverse drug reactions were recorded, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated based on progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The median PFS was 9.81 ± 0.9 months, and the 6-month and 10-month PFS rates were 73.3% and 33.3%, respectively. The median OS was 11.43 ± 0.58 months. No patients achieved complete response. After 6 months of treatment, the DCR and ORR were 80% and 13.3%, respectively. No drug-related deaths or Grade 4 adverse events occurred in the patients. Five patients (33.3%) had Grade 3 adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events were hand-food syndrome, fatigue, high blood pressure, anorexia, and pneumothorax. Anlotinib had a certain curative effect on patients with advanced osteosarcoma and metastases after failure of standard treatment. The adverse events were mostly tolerable or relieved after treatment.

Prophylaxis of neutropenia with mecapegfilgrastim in patients with non-myeloid malignancies in a real-world setting.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24072-e24072
Author(s):  
Jun Ma ◽  
Huiqiang Huang ◽  
Peifen Fu ◽  
Nong Xu ◽  
Chenyu Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Chemotherapy Cycle ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Continuous Administration ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Long Acting

e24072 Background: The prophylaxis of neutropenia has been evolving from short acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) to long acting G-CSFs. The safety and effectiveness of long acting G-CSF in a real-world setting were still lacking. Methods: We performed a multi-center, non-interventional, real-world study to explore the tolerability and effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim. Different prophylactic strategy (primary or secondary prophylaxis) were compared. The effect of mecapegfilgrastim by means of continuous administration was also explored. Results: This study included 638 patients who had complete the study from May 2019 to November 15, 2020. About half of the participants were breast cancer patients. The mean age of the patients were 56 years. The most frequently reported adverse event possibly related to study drug was white blood cell increase (6.2 %). No unexpected adverse events were reported. Overall, thirty-six (5.6 %) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 neutropenia in chemotherapy cycle one. The patients in the primary and secondary prophylaxis subgroups had incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia of 4.3 % and 9.2 % in chemotherapy cycle one respectively. There was a decreasing trend of neutropenia from cycle one to cycle four when mecapegfilgrastim were administrated continuously. Conclusions: The mecapegfilgrastim was well tolerable and no unexpected adverse events were observed in real-world setting. Primary prophylaxis using mecapegfilgrastim had lower incidence of neutropenia than secondary usage.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of rifabutin among HIV/TB-coinfected children on lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2707-2715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly E Rawizza ◽  
Kristin M Darin ◽  
Regina Oladokun ◽  
Biobele Brown ◽  
Babatunde Ogunbosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Absolute Neutrophil Count ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Laboratory Monitoring ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Cell Percentage ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cd4 Cell

Abstract Background TB is the leading cause of death among HIV-infected children, yet treatment options for those who require PI-based ART are suboptimal. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin for adults on PI-based ART; only one study has evaluated its use among children on PIs and two of six children developed treatment-limiting neutropenia. Methods Since 2009, rifabutin has been available for HIV/TB-coinfected children requiring PI-based ART in the Harvard/APIN programme in Nigeria. We retrospectively analysed laboratory and clinical toxicities at baseline and during rifabutin therapy, and examined HIV/TB outcomes. Results Between 2009 and 2015, 48 children received rifabutin-containing TB therapy with PI (lopinavir/ritonavir)-based ART: 50% were female with a median (IQR) baseline age of 1.7 (0.9–5.0) years and a median (IQR) CD4+ cell percentage of 15% (9%–25%); 52% were ART experienced. Eighty-five percent completed the 6 month rifabutin course with resolution of TB symptoms and 79% were retained in care at 12 months. Adverse events (grade 1–4) were more common at baseline (27%) than during rifabutin treatment (15%) (P = 0.006). Absolute neutrophil count was lower during rifabutin compared with baseline (median = 1762 versus 2976 cells/mm3, respectively), but only one instance (2%) of grade 3 neutropenia occurred during rifabutin treatment. Conclusions With clinical and laboratory monitoring, our data suggest that rifabutin is a safe option for TB therapy among children on PI-based ART. By contrast with the only other study of this combination in children, severe neutropenia was rare. Furthermore, outcomes from this cohort suggest that rifabutin is effective, and a novel option for children who require PI-based ART. Additional study of rifabutin plus PIs in children is urgently needed.

scholarly journals Hepatocellular carcinoma with type II–III portal vein tumour thrombosis: treatment using transarterial chemoembolisation and microwave ablation

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1117) ◽  
pp. 20200415
Author(s):  
Wen Peng Zhao ◽  
Honglu Li ◽  
Jiang Guo ◽  
Liang Cai ◽  
Youjia Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Microwave Ablation ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Treatment Alternative ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolisation ◽  
Grade 3

Objective: To evaluate the use of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and type Ⅱ–Ⅲ portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT) intolerant to targeted drug (TG) therapy. Methods: A total of 18 patients with HCC and type Ⅱ–Ⅲ PVTT intolerant to TG were enrolled between June 2015 and December 2019, who were treated with TACE + MWA (MWA group). 24 patients were treated with TACE + TG (TG group; control cohort). Time to progression and overall survival (OS) were analysed along with the incidence of adverse events. Results: The median follow-up time was 19.0 months (9.0–32.0 months). The median OS was 17.0 months (8.3–29.3 months; MWA group) and 13.5 months (5.5–22.5 months; TG group) and was not significantly different. The 1- and 2 year OS was also comparable (MWA group: 66.7%, 44.4% vs Target group: 41.7%, 29.2%). Time to progression showed no distinct differences (MWA group: 11.5 months; TG group: 9.0 months) between the two groups. Moreover, the incidence of major Grade 3–4 adverse events in the MWA group (5.6%) was similar to those in the TG group (8.3%). Conclusion: TACE + MWA and TACE + TG were comparable in their safety and efficacy in patients with HCC, type Ⅱ–Ⅲ PVTT, and intolerance to TG. Advances in knowledge: TACE + MWA can be used as a palliative treatment alternative for TACE + TG in patients with HCC, type Ⅱ–Ⅲ PVTT, and intolerance to TG.

scholarly journals Real-world adverse events with niraparib 200 mg/day maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (36) ◽  
pp. 4197-4206
Author(s):  
Jack R Gallagher ◽  
Kylee Jean Heap ◽  
Susan Carroll ◽  
Karin Travers ◽  
Brooke Harrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Medical Record Data ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Record Data ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: To assess real-world occurrence of common clinical trial-reported adverse events (AE) among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer initiating niraparib 200 mg/day. Materials & methods: This retrospective observational study used physician-extracted anonymized medical record data of eligible patients initiating niraparib 200 mg/day after platinum-based chemotherapy. Results: Of 153 patients, 57 (37%) experienced ≥1 of the three most common all-grade AEs within 3 months after niraparib initiation: nausea (16%; grade 3/4: 2%), thrombocytopenia (14%; grade 3/4: 3%) and fatigue (24%; grade 3/4: 3%). In the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, these respective AEs occurred in 74, 61 and 59% of patients. Conclusion: Incidence of common clinical trial-reported AEs was lower among patients initiating niraparib 200 mg/day in real-world practice versus patients initiating niraparib 300 mg/day in ENGOT-OV16/NOVA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document