A systematic review of full endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic or open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Aiyer ◽  
Selaiman Noori ◽  
Frank Schirripa ◽  
Michael Schirripa ◽  
Sameer Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Lower Complication Rate ◽  
Electronic Database Search

Aim: Endoscopic discectomies provide several advantages over other techniques such as traditional open lumbar discectomy (OLD) including possibly decreased complications, shorter hospital stay and an earlier return to work. Methods: An electronic database search including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Controlled trials (CENTRAL) were reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. Results: A total of nine RCTs met inclusion criteria. Three showed benefit of endoscopic discectomy over the comparator with regards to pain relief, with the remaining six studies showing no difference in pain relief or function. Conclusion: Based on review of the nine included studies, we can conclude that endoscopic discectomy is as effective as other surgical techniques, and has additional benefits of lower complication rate and superior perioperative parameters.

scholarly journals The Role of Traditional Acupuncture in Patients with Fecal Incontinence—Mini-Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 2112
Author(s):  
Agne Sipaviciute ◽  
Tomas Aukstikalnis ◽  
Narimantas E. Samalavicius ◽  
Audrius Dulskas
Keyword(s):  
Fecal Incontinence ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Bowel Dysfunction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Treatment Technique ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Electronic Database Search ◽  
Irritable Bowel

Objective: Fecal incontinence affects up to 15% of the general population, with higher rates of incidence among women and the elderly. Acupuncture is an old practice of Traditional Chinese Medicine that might be used to treat fecal incontinence. The aim of this mini review was to assess the effect of acupuncture for fecal incontinence. Materials and Methods: Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL electronic databases were searched until August 2020. The following keywords were used: acupuncture, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, fecal incontinence, diarrhea, irritable bowel syndrome, and bowel dysfunction. In addition, references were searched. Five studies (two randomized controlled trials), out of 52,249 predefined publications after an electronic database search, were included into the review. Results: Overall, 143 patients were included. All studies report significant improvements in continence, although they all apply different acupuncture regimens. Randomized controlled trials show significant differences in experimental groups treated with acupuncture in improving continence. Significant improvement in quality of life scores was reported. In addition, improvement in fecal continence remained significantly improved after 18 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Acupuncture is a promising treatment alternative for fecal incontinence. Based on small, low-quality studies, it might be a safe, inexpensive, and efficient method. However, more high-quality studies are needed in order to apply this treatment technique routinely.

Thirty Years of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: Analysis of Meta-Analyses

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (05) ◽  
pp. 420-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim F. Kuebler ◽  
Jens Dingemann ◽  
Benno M. Ure ◽  
Nagoud Schukfeh
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Introduction In the last three decades, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely used in pediatric surgery. Meta-analyses (MAs) showed that studies comparing minimally invasive with the corresponding open operations are available only for selected procedures. We evaluated all available MAs comparing MIS with the corresponding open procedure in pediatric surgery. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed on all MAs listed on PubMed. All analyses published in English, comparing pediatric minimally invasive with the corresponding open procedures, were included. End points were advantages and disadvantages of MIS. Results of 43 manuscripts were included. MAs evaluating the minimally invasive with the corresponding open procedures were available for 11 visceral, 4 urologic, and 3 thoracoscopic types of procedures. Studies included 34 randomized controlled trials. In 77% of MAs, at least one advantage of MIS was identified. The most common advantages of MIS were a shorter hospital stay in 20, a shorter time to feeding in 11, and a lower complication rate in 7 MAs. In 53% of MAs, at least one disadvantage of MIS was found. The most common disadvantages were longer operation duration in 16, a higher recurrence rate of diaphragmatic hernia in 4, and gastroesophageal reflux in 2 MAs. A lower native liver survival rate after laparoscopic Kasai-portoenterostomy was reported in one MA. Conclusion In the available MAs, the advantages of MIS seem to outnumber the disadvantages. However, for some types of procedures, MIS may have considerable disadvantages. More randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the advantage of MIS for most procedures.

scholarly journals Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Perioperative Pain Management of Geriatric Patients with Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Hao-yang Wan ◽  
Su-yi Li ◽  
Wei Ji ◽  
Bin Yu ◽  
Nan Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Perioperative Pain Management ◽  
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block

Background. With continuous increase of the aging population, the number of geriatric patients with fragility hip fractures is rising sharply, and timely surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. However, adequate and effective pain control is the precondition of satisfactory efficacy. This systematic review aimed to summarize the use of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) as an analgesic strategy for perioperative pain management in geriatric patients with hip fractures. Methods. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for English published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting application of FICB for pain control of the older adults with hip fractures between January 1st, 2000, and May 31st, 2020. The modified Jadad scale was used to evaluate quality of the RCTs included. Primary outcomes of the eligible RCTs were presented and discussed. Results. A total of 27 RCTs with 2478 cases were included finally. The present outcomes suggested, after admission or in the emergency department (ED), FICB can provide patients with equal or even better pain relief compared with the conventional analgesia methods, which can also reduce additional analgesic consumptions. While, before positioning for spinal anesthesia (SA), FICB is able to offer superior pain control, facilitating SA performance, after surgery FICB can effectively alleviate pain with decreased use of additional analgesics, promoting earlier mobilization and preventing complications. Conclusions. FICB is a safe, reliable, and easy-to-conduct technique, which is able to provide adequate pain relief during perioperative management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.

scholarly journals The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 182-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Starr ◽  
Iain Chalmers ◽  
Mike Clarke ◽  
Andrew D. Oxman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Electronic Publication ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cochrane Reviews ◽  
New Information ◽  
Cochrane Database

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) evolved in response to Archie Cochrane's challenge to the medical profession to assemble “a critical summary, adapted periodically, of all . . . relevant randomized controlled trials”. CDSR has been an electronic publication from its inception and this has meant that Cochrane reviews (i) need not be constrained by lack of space; (ii) can be updated as new information becomes available and when mistakes or other ways of improving them are identified; and (iii) can be cross-linked to other, related sources of relevant information. Although CDSR has become widely cited, it must continue to evolve in the light of technological and methodological developments, and in response to the needs of people making decisions about health care.

scholarly journals Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Cromoscopia Versus Colonoscopia Convencional na Deteção de Pólipos ColoRetais. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 583
Author(s):  
Diogo Libânio ◽  
Luís Filipe Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Polyp Detection ◽  
High Definition ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cochrane Database

Although colonoscopy is considered the most accurate test for the investigation of colorectal polyps, lesions ≤ 10 mm may be missed in approximately 10%. Chromoscopy may increase the detection of colorectal polyps. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the benefit of cromoscopy in colorectal polyps detection. Seven randomized controlled trials were included (incuding 2,727 participants) comparing polyp detection (both neoplastic and non- neoplastic polyps) in patients submitted to conventional colonoscopy or colonoscopy with chromoscopy. Chromoscopy was associated with a significant improvement in all detection endpoints (number of polyps, number of neoplastic polyps, number of diminutive polyps, number of neoplastic diminutive polyps, proportion of patients with at least one polyp and proportion of patients with at least one neoplastic polyp). However, when highdefinition colonoscopes were used in the control group, chromoscopy benefit does not seem to be significant. Besides, routine use of chromoscopy may have implications in the accessibility of colonoscopy and in the effectiveness of screening programs. Moreover, the benefit of chromoscopy in the era of high-definition colonoscopy is questionable.

Systematic Review of Ablative Neurosurgical Techniques for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 973-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Lopez ◽  
Peter J. Hamlyn ◽  
Joanna M. Zakrzewska
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation ◽  
Complete Pain Relief ◽  
Glycerol Rhizolysis

Abstract OBJECTIVE There are no randomized controlled trials comparing retrogasserian percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation, glycerol rhizolysis, balloon compression of the gasserian ganglion, and stereotactic radiosurgery, nor are there systematic reviews using predefined quality criteria. The objective of this study was to systematically identify all of the studies reporting outcomes and complications of ablative techniques for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, from the development of electronic databases, and to evaluate them with predefined quality criteria. METHODS Inclusion criteria for the outcome analysis included thorough demographic documentation, defined diagnostic and outcome criteria, a minimum of 30 patients treated and median/mean follow-up times of 12 months, not more than 20% of patients lost to follow-up monitoring, Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis of individual procedures, less than 10% of patients retreated because of failure or early recurrence, and a minimal dose of 70 Gy for stereotactic radiosurgery. High-quality studies with no actuarial analysis were used for the evaluation of complications. RESULTS Of 175 studies identified, 9 could be used to evaluate rates of complete pain relief on a yearly basis and 22 could be used to evaluate complications. In mixed series, radiofrequency thermocoagulation offered higher rates of complete pain relief, compared with glycerol rhizolysis and stereotactic radiosurgery, although it demonstrated the greatest number of complications. CONCLUSION Radiofrequency thermocoagulation offers the highest rates of complete pain relief, although further data on balloon microcompression are required. It is essential that uniform outcome measures and actuarial methods be universally adopted for the reporting of surgical results. Randomized controlled trials are required to reliably evaluate new surgical techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document