Certain issues of the formation of the administrative and legal status of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
ELENA A. LESNYKH ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Effective Work ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Full Independence ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this article is the administrative and legal status of the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. A critical analysis of some provisions of the Federal law ‘On the Judicial Department’, which are not quite successful, in the author’s opinion, reveals a trend in the development of the legal status of the Department, which does not go beyond the narrowly utilitarian implementation of the functions of financial, material, technical and personnel support for real access to justice. Based on the analysis of scientific and practical literature, normative material, the author reveals a contradiction between the recognized in the literature some uncertainty of legal status, on the one hand, and adequate and effective work that corresponds to the tasks facing the Department, on the other. There are obvious contradictions and gaps in the legal regulation of the Department’s activities that require correction. Thus, the definition of the Department ‘under’ the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation puts it formally and legally, in terms of literal interpretation of the law, in direct administrative subordination. To ensure full independence of the Judicial Department as ‘non-systemic’ beyond the branches of government, public authority proposed to withdraw it from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in personnel matters with the appointment of the Head of Department by the decree of the President of Russia on representation of the Council of judges.

scholarly journals Novels of the Criminal Code on responsibility for abusesin public procurement: background and problems of qualification

2018 ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
A. Ya. Asnis
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Service Contract ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Contract Managers

The article deals with the criminological grounds and background of the adoption of the Federal law of April 23, 2018 № 99-FZ, which introduced criminal liability for abuse in the procurement of goods, works and services for state or municipal needs (Art. 2004 of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and for bribery of employees of contract service, contract managers, members of the Commission on the implementation of the procurement of persons engaged in the acceptance of the delivered goods, performed works or rendered services, other authorized persons, representing interests of customer in the scope of the relevant procurement (Art. 2005 of the Criminal Code).The author formulates private rules of qualification of the corresponding crimes and differentiation of their structures from structures of adjacent crimes and administrative offenses. The necessity of changing the position of the legislator regarding generic and direct objects of these crimes, the adoption of a special resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to explain the practice of applying the relevant innovations.

scholarly journals INDIVIDUAL LEGAL ACTS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON FAMILY DISPUTES CONCERNING PROPERTY

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 19-27
Author(s):  
O. N. Nizamieva
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Family ◽  
Lower Courts ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article has analyzed the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on family disputes that involve property issues, revealed features of implementation of functions of the highest court in this field. First, it is stated that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation reviews decisions of lower courts mainly in cases where the application of family law rules is contradictory and unsettled. It is necessary to fill in a gap in family law, to resolve conflicts between certain legal norms, to choose between several possible interpretations of the law. Second, the judicial panels of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, making a determination on a particular case, clarify the meaning of legal norms, and sometimes under the guise of interpretation in fact correct ill-considered or outdated norms of family law. Third, the High Court reviews cases where there is a typical and widespread error in the application of a very clear and defined rule. Fourth, in individual legal acts it is possible to observe the concretization or change of the previously designated legal stances while maintaining the legislative rules in the same form. Using certain examples of cases considered by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on family disputes concerning property, the paper has demonstrated the mechanism of possible transformation of abstract, non-personified and doctrinally oriented provisions contained in the definitions of judicial boards of the Supreme Court to general legal regulators. The author has determined certain problems of legal regulation of property relations in the family that have not been settled by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals DIGITAL CURRENCY AS A SUBJECT OF CRIME AND A MEANS OF COMMITTING CRIMES

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
A.A. Korennaya
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Digital Currency ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Official Recognition

In this article, the author examines the issues of the criminal legal status of digital currency as an objectand as a means of committing a crime. In 2020, a special Federal law was adopted defining the legal status ofdigital assets, as well as amendments were made to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation concerning theestablishment of the legal status of cryptocurrency or digital currency in the terminology of these regulationsas an object of civil rights. Significant changes in the civil legal regulation of cryptocurrencies have led to achange in approaches to assessing the criminal legal status of virtual money. In particular, the recognitionof digital currency by other property has allowed solving a number of qualification issues, but until now,criminal law is very cautious about the official recognition of cryptocurrency as the subject of a crime. Theauthor of the work offers options for the qualification of crimes committed using digital currency, in theabsence of changes in the criminal law and explanations of the Highest Court.

Russian Court Interpretation of Legislative Measuresfor Advanced Training and (or) Professional Training of the Selected Employed Population Aged from 25 to 65 Years

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Alexander Vasilyevich ZAVGORODNIY ◽  
Ilya Alexandrovich VASILYEV ◽  
Nelli Ivanovna DIVEEVA ◽  
Marina Valentinovna FILIPPOVA ◽  
Mikhail Mikhailovich KHARITONOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Advanced Training ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
Additional Qualification ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

In this article, we present the first generalization and analysis of decisions made by Russian courts of general jurisdiction from 2009 to 2016 for the application of provisions of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, the Federal Law of November 21, 2011 No. 323-FZ ʼOn the fundamentals of protecting the health of citizens in the Russian Federationʼ, the Federal Law of July 3, 2016 No. 238-FZ ʼOn independent qualification assessmentʼ, the Federal Law of December 29, 2013 No. 273-FZ ʼOn education in the Russian Federationʼ, the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 28, 2013 No. 966 ʼOn licensing educational activitiesʼ adopted to fulfill the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2012 No. 599 ʼAbout measures to implement the state policy in the sphere of education and scienceʼ in the field of advanced training and (or) professional training of employed population aged from 25 to 65 years. As a result, we have made several conclusions. Firstly, if periodical advanced training is a mandatory condition for admission to work (for example, for medical workers), then courts using separate methods of protecting rights of citizens (in particular, health care), should understand the consequences of these decisions. Secondly, the imposition of administrative sanctions in accordance with Part 3 of Article 19.20 of the Code of Administrative Offences due to the non-systematic increase in the professional level of educators recommends improving the algorithm for substantiating the gross violation of license requirements. Thirdly, the legal status of a person who has concluded an agreement on advanced training differs from that of an apprenticeship contract, and the guarantees for this person are not established by Articles 203-205 but rather Article 187 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Therefore, courts should not qualify a contract on advanced training as an apprenticeship contract. Fourthly, if advanced training is not designated for employees as additional qualification and an employer does not have the duty to pay for this training, then the resolution of a possible dispute should be based on whether the employer's interest is realized or not. Fifthly, the impossibility of an employee to work should be objective and compulsory, which is assessed by the law enforcer based on the balance of rights and interests of both parties of the corresponding employment contract. Sixthly, the legal regulation of the independent assessment of working qualification requires its improvement and alignment with norms of the labor legislation of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals On the Terms for Making and Filing for Review of Administrative Offense Minutes

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 54-56
Author(s):  
Aleksey S. Lizunov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The article draws attention to the imperfection of the legal regulation of certain procedural terms in the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. The position of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation was recognized as unjustified, regarding the recognition of the time frame for drawing up and further forwarding the protocol on an administrative offense for the consideration of the case as non-restrictive. A proposal has been formulated to legislatively consolidate the provision that a protocol on an administrative offense should be drawn up and sent for consideration as soon as possible, but not beyond the statute of limitations for bringing to administrative responsibility.

scholarly journals Relevant Problems of Improving the Measures of Criminological Prevention of Extremist Crimes Committed Using Information and Telecommunication Networks

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 776-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Ivantsov ◽  
Sergey Borisov ◽  
Gulfiya Usembaeva ◽  
Tatiana Muzychuk ◽  
Yuri Tishchenko
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Telecommunication Networks ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Republic Of Bashkortostan ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Internal Affairs ◽  
The Republic

The goal of this study is to identify the problems in the existing system of criminological prevention of extremist crimes committed using information and telecommunication networks, and to work out ideas for its improvement. The authors use general and special research methods, primarily, sociological ones. They have studied 184 criminal cases of extremist crimes committed using information and telecommunication networks tried in courts in the cities of Irkutsk, Moscow, Penza, in Kursk, Moscow, Murmansk, Samara and Chelyabinsk Regions and in the Republic of Bashkortostan in 2010–2017. The have also analyzed the published decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and surveyed 158 employees of the internal affairs bodies, 42 judges, 80 employees of the Investigation Committee of the Russian Federation, as well as 46 faculty members from Moscow, Moscow Region and the Republic of Bashkortostan. The authors have analyzed statistical data for 2010–2017 gathered by the Chief Information and Analytics Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and the Court Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The article takes into account novels of criminal legislation regarding the use of information and telecommunication networks for committing extremist crimes introduced in 2013–2017, the clauses of the Federal Law «On the Basics of the System of Preventing Crimes in the Russian Federation» of 2016. The authors also pay attention to the Strategy of State National Policy of the Russian Federation until 2025, the Counter-Extremism Strategy of the Russian Federation until 2025, the Doctrine of Information Security of 2016, the Strategy of Developing Information Society in the Russian Federation in 2017–2030, and the new Clarifications of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. A complex research of the problems of counteracting extremist crimes committed with the use of information and telecommunication networks allowed the authors to formulate suggestions on improving the system of criminological prevention of these criminal acts.

scholarly journals Implementation of FATF approaches to the regulation of virtual assets in the legislation of the Russian Federation: development prospects

2020 ◽  
pp. 138-147
Author(s):  
T. E. Rozhdestvenskaya ◽  
A. G. Guznov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Financial Assets ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Monetary System ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Development Prospects

The emergence and dissemination of digital values, and, above all, cryptocurrencies, necessitated their legal regulation. The article analyzes the basic FATF requirements to the legal regulation of virtual assets. The article discusses legislative novelties that enshrine the legal status of utilitarian digital rights, as well as the main provisions of the draft federal law “On Digital Financial Assets”, which is currently being discussed in the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Particular attention is paid to the approaches to the legal regulation of cryptocurrencies. The risks arising from the legal circulation of cryptocurrencies are identified and systematized. It is concluded that deciding on the legalization of cryptocurrency requires provision of mechanisms protecting the rights and legitimate interests of its owners as well as mechanisms preventing possible negative impact of cryptocurrency on the state’s monetary system.

scholarly journals Criminal infraction as a mean of differentiating criminal responsibility and punishment

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
E. A. BABAYANTS ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

Discussions caused by the initiative of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the introduction of a new category of offenses – criminal infraction which can occupy an intermediate link between an administrative offense and a criminal offense – do not stop. The article reveals the concept of a criminal infraction, lists its main features, considers the feasibility of introducing this category into domestic criminal legislation. A brief analysis of the legislation of a number of foreign countries is also given, the possibility of applying such experience in Russian conditions is assessed. The conclusion is formulated that it is necessary to recognize as fair the arguments challenging the necessity of adopting the draft law in the form in which it was submitted for consideration by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Attention is drawn to the fact that in those countries where the category of criminal offense was introduced, a fundamental reform of the criminal legislation was required: a total revision of the norms of the existing criminal legislation or the adoption of a separate Code of criminal infractions (for example, in Kyrgyzstan). Based on this the draft law under consideration appears to be a half-measure, which will lead to the complication of the existing legal regulation. The most correct way to resolve the problem under consideration would be to reduce the number of minor offenses in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

scholarly journals National Anti-Corruption Plan for 2021-2024: anti-corruption elements of the legal status of civil officers

2021 ◽  
pp. 166-175
Author(s):  
Ivan Vladimirovich Grigorev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The subject of this research is the normative sources that establish the rights, responsibilities and prohibitions in civil service, as well as the mechanisms for their implementation. The author dwells on the practical issues arising in the context of implementation of anti-corruption legislation associated with the right of the officers to exercise other paid activity, acquire and own securities, responsibility to notify about the possible colliding interests, limitation on the deed of gift due to their professional activities, providing data on income, expenses, property, and real obligations. Special attention is given to certain legal provisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and courts of general jurisdiction related to the peculiarities of the legal status of civil officers. The scientific novelty consists in comprehensive examination of the legal issues in regulation of anti-corruption elements of the legal status of civil officers. The main conclusions lies in determination of the gaps and conflicts of legal regulation of such relations. Critical assessment is given to the case law on the appeal of the prosecutors to transfer the property with no evidence that it has been acquired with legitimate income to the income of the Russian Federation. The author formulates recommendations for the improvement of the existing federal legislation on countering corruption in civil service.

scholarly journals Some issues of legal regulation (of the legal status) control and accounting bodies of municipalities

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
Oleg Kozhevnikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Government Organization ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation

Almost three decades have passed since the appearance of the Law of the Russian Federation from 06.07.1991 No. 1550-1 «On local self-government in the Russian Federation». Over the past historical stage, the regulatory framework of local self-government and its bodies has significantly transformed: this applies to the concept of local self-government, territorial and organizational foundations, and of course the legal status of individual local self-government bodies. This article provides a comparative legal analysis of certain provisions of Federal law No. 131-FZ of 06.102.2003 «On General principles of local self-government organization in the Russian Federation» and Federal law No. 6-FZ of 07.02.2011 «On General principles of organization and activity of control and accounting bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation and municipalities» in the part concerning control and accounting bodies of municipalities. Based on the results of this analysis, significant contradictions were identified in the basic Federal normative legal acts regulating the legal status of the control and accounting body of a municipality, which need to be corrected by the Federal legislator in order to increase the level of unity and consistency in the legal regulation of the status of one of the most important bodies in the system of local self-government-the control and accounting body of a municipality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document