scholarly journals SIROLIMUS EFFICACY IN THE TREATMENT OF CRITICALLY- ILL INFANTS WITH CHYLOUS EFFUSIONS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreya Agarwal ◽  
Berkley Anderson ◽  
Priya Mahajan ◽  
Caraciolo Fernandes ◽  
Judith Margolin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Vascular Malformations ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Respiratory Morbidity ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Investigation Methods ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Background: While rare in children, chylothorax is a significant cause of respiratory morbidity and can lead to malnutrition and immunodeficiency. Historically, the traditional pharmacological treatment has been octreotide. There are several treatments that have been utilized in the past few years including sirolimus, however data regarding their efficacy and outcomes is limited. Furthermore, sirolimus has proven efficacy in complex vascular malformations, and hence, its utility/efficacy in pediatric chylous effusions warrants further investigation. Methods: In this retrospective study at Texas Children’s Hospital, data were extracted for all patients with chylothorax who were treated with sirolimus between 2009 and 2020. Details regarding underlying diagnosis, co-morbidities and number of days from sirolimus initiation to resolution of effusion were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the study cohort. Results: Initially a total of twelve infants were identified. Among them, seven patients had complete data and were included in the study. The mean duration of sirolimus treatment needed for chest tube removal was 16 days, with a median of 19 days and range of 7- 22 days. Chest tube output corresponded with sirolimus serum trough levels and trended down prior to chest tube removal. Conclusion: With close monitoring, sirolimus is a safe and effective therapy for pediatric lymphatic effusions even in critically-ill infants. The study also demonstrates shorter duration of chest tube requirement after initiation of sirolimus compared to previous studies. Our conclusion is based on a small case series due to the rare incidence of the condition.

Dimensions of procedural pain and its analgesic management in critically ill surgical patients

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
KA Puntillo
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Endotracheal Suctioning ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Pain Experiences ◽  
Dimensions Of Pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many critically ill patients undergo endotracheal suctioning and chest tube removal procedures, yet little documentation of associated pain exists. Therefore, a study was conducted to (1) compare the magnitude and dimensions of pain associated with endotracheal suctioning and chest tube removal in intubated and nonintubated patients and (2) correlate preprocedural analgesic administration and pain magnitude. METHODS: Multiple dimensions of pain (ie, intensity, extent, sensation, and affect) were measured after postoperative cardiovascular surgery patients underwent endotracheal suctioning (N = 45) or chest tube removal (N = 35). Preprocedural analgesics and intubation status during pain assessments were noted. RESULTS: Patients reported lower pain intensity with endotracheal suctioning (mean, 4.9 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale) than with chest tube removal (mean, 6.6). Pain extent, sensation, and affect scores were relatively low for endotracheal suctioning and chest tube removal. Similar words such as "tender," "sharp," and "heavy" were used to describe both procedures; however, more patients described their response to chest tube removal as "fearful." Intubated patients had different pain experiences than extubated patients. Patients received little analgesic premedication, and correlations were low and nonsignificant between amount of medication received and pain magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were able to communicate extensive information about procedural pain, even when intubated. Endotracheal suctioning and chest tube removal were both painful; yet, there was little preparatory analgesic management of the pain. Research is needed to investigate a variety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for pain related to endotracheal suctioning and chest tube removal.

Autologous Blood Pleurodesis: What Is the Optimal Time Interval and Amount of Blood?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Campisi ◽  
Andrea Dell'Amore ◽  
Yonghui Zhang ◽  
Zhitao Gu ◽  
Angelo Paolo Ciarrocchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Autologous Blood ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Blood Patch ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Abstract Background Air leak is the most common complication after lung resection and leads to increased length of hospital (LOH) stay or patient discharge with a chest tube. Management by autologous blood patch pleurodesis (ABPP) is controversial because few studies exist, and the technique has yet to be standardized. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing ABPP for prolonged air leak (PAL) following lobectomy in three centers, between January 2014 and December 2019. They were divided into two groups: Group A, 120 mL of blood infused; Group B, 60 mL. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed, and 23 patients were included in each group. Numbers and success rates of blood patch, time to cessation of air leak, time to chest tube removal, reoperation, LOH, and complications were examined. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables associated with an increased risk of air leak was performed. Results After the PSM, 120 mL of blood is statistically significant in reducing the number of days before chest tube removal after ABPP (2.78 vs. 4.35), LOH after ABPP (3.78 vs. 10.00), and LOH (8.78 vs. 15.17). Complications (0 vs. 4) and hours until air leak cessation (6.83 vs. 3.91, range 1–13) after ABPP were also statistically different (p < 0.05). Air leaks that persisted for up to 13 hours required another ABPP. No patient had re-operation or long-term complications related to pleurodesis. Conclusion In our experience, 120 mL is the optimal amount of blood and the procedure can be repeated every 24 hours with the chest tube clamped.

“Chest Tube” Removal after Liver Transgression

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Hegarty ◽  
Jan F. Gerstenmaier ◽  
David Brophy
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Technique for chest tube removal

ASVIDE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 226-226
Author(s):  
Kyung Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Chest tube removal after cardiac surgery

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
SC Thomson ◽  
S Wells ◽  
M Maxwell
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Chest Tubes ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Prompt remove of chest tubes by RNs has allowed earlier and more aggressive ambulation of our patients and, along with other interventions, has decreased length of stay by 1.5 days while improving quality of care. Proper education, both didactic and clinical, is the key component in preparing RNs to safely and effectively perform this procedure.

scholarly journals Safety of early discharge with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-618
Author(s):  
Feichao Bao ◽  
Natasha Toleska Dimitrovska ◽  
Shoujun Hu ◽  
Xiao Chu ◽  
Wentao Li
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Hospital Days

Abstract OBJECTIVES Early removal of chest tube is an important step in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. However, after pulmonary resection with a wide dissection plane, such as pulmonary segmentectomy, prolonged air leak, a large volume of pleural drainage and the risk of developing empyema in patients can delay chest tube removal and result in a low rate of completion of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of discharging patients with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon’s experience of pulmonary segmentectomy from May 2019 to September 2019. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for discharging with a chest tube were discharged and provided written instructions. They returned for chest tube removal after satisfactory resolution of air leak or fluid drainage. RESULTS In total, 126 patients underwent pulmonary segmentectomy. Ninety-five (75%) patients were discharged with a chest tube postoperatively. The mean time to chest tube removal after discharge was 5.6 (range 2–32) days, potentially saving 532 inpatient hospital days. Overall, 90 (95%) patients experienced uneventful and successful outpatient chest tube management. No life-threatening complications were observed. No patient experienced complications resulting from chest tube malfunction. Five (5%) patients experienced minor complications. Overall, all patients reported good-to-excellent mobility with a chest tube. CONCLUSIONS Successful postoperative outpatient chest tube management after pulmonary segmentectomy can be accomplished in selected patients without a major increase in morbidity or mortality.

Clinical descriptors of pneumothorax following chest tube removal in paediatric cardiac surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Christine LaGrasta ◽  
Mary McLellan ◽  
Jean Connor
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Chest Radiograph ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Paediatric Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background: There is limited data describing the characteristics of paediatric post-operative cardiac surgery patients who develop pneumothoraces after chest tube removal. Patient management after chest tube removal is not standardised across paediatric cardiac surgery programmes. The purposes of this study were to describe the frequency of pneumothorax after chest tube removal in paediatric post-operative cardiac surgical patients and to describe the patient and clinical characteristics of those patients who developed a clinically significant pneumothorax requiring intervention. Methods: A single-institution retrospective descriptive study (1 January, 2010–31 December, 2018) was utilised to review 11,651 paediatric post-operative cardiac surgical patients from newborn to 18 years old. Results: Twenty-five patients were diagnosed with a pneumothorax by chest radiograph following chest tube removal (0.2%). Of these 25 patients, 15 (1.6%) had a clinically significant pneumothorax and 8 (53%) did not demonstrate a change in baseline clinical status or require an increase in supplemental oxygen, 14 (93%) required an intervention, 9 (60%) were <1 year of age, 4 (27%) had single-ventricle physiology, and 5 (33%) had other non-cardiac anomalies/genetic syndromes. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients, we confirmed the incidence of pneumothorax after chest tube removal is low in paediatric post-operative cardiac surgery patients. This population does not always exhibit changes in clinical status despite having clinically significant pneumothoraces. We suggest the development of criteria, based on clinical characteristics, for patients who are at increased risk of developing a pneumothorax and would require a routine chest radiograph following chest tube removal.

Modern drainage techniques for pain reduction during chest tube removal

Heart & Lung ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-233
Author(s):  
Helmut Mair ◽  
Ralf Sodian ◽  
Sabine Daebritz
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document