scholarly journals Retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy vs. Conventional adrenalectomy in treatment of benign adrenal lesions: Comparative analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Todorov ◽  
Tc. Lukanova
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Adrenal Tumors ◽  
Endoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Median Operative Time

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is considered to be the standard of care for the surgical treatment of the adrenal gland? s pathology. Since the initial report of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 1992 and of retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomy in 1994, it has evolved into a feasible and safe minimally invasive procedure for benign adrenal tumors. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 63 retroperitoneal endoscopic adrenalectomies (REAs) and 45 conventional adrenalectomies (CAs) from 1996 to 2004 were evaluated. 61 patients underwent 63 REAs. Tumor size varied from 2 to 8 cm. Median age was 48.6 years. Median operative time was 135 min (45-240), median intraoperative blood loss - 85 ml (30- 550). The complication rate was 17.77%. Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (2-10). 44 patients underwent 45 conventional adenalectomies. Median age was 44.5 years (16-71). Intraoperative complication rate was 17.77%, postoperative - 22.22 %, Median operative time was 120 min (75 -240). Median postoperative hospital stay was 10 days (6-21). No statistically significant difference was established between median operative times of REA- and CA-groups (p=0.91). Conventional adrenalectomy was associated with a significantly increased complication rate (p= 0.009). Hospitalization was also longer after the open technique (d). Introduced in 1994 and displaying all advantages of minimal access surgery REA has become the standard of care for benign adrenal tumors. .

scholarly journals Modification of the Classical Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Procedure for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia to Reduce Complications: A Multiple-Centered Comparison Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-bin Luo ◽  
Jing-rong Tu ◽  
Hong-guang Shi ◽  
Zhi-yong Du ◽  
Xian-cai Xiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Foreign Body Reaction ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Pediatric Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Safe Approach

Abstract Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation (SLPEL) for pediatric inguinal hernia gained popularity all over the world. However, complications associated with extraperitoneal knotting were not rare in the classical SLPEL(C-SLPEL) procedure. In order to overcome disadvantages, we herein developed the modified SLPEL (M-SLPEL) procedure, intact circuit ligation of the peritoneum around the internal ring using a homemade hernia needle with a single abdominal wall centesis. To evaluated the effectiveness of the M-SLPEL procedure to decrease adverse events associated with ligation knotting, a comparative study was carried out. A total of 3219 patients from multiple centers were divided into two groups according to the operative procedures: M-SLPEL group and C-SLPEL group. All patients were followed up. Data describing the clinical characteristics, operative time, postoperative hospital stay, and complications was collected and retrospectively analyzed. With equivalent operative time, postoperative hospital stay, there was statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of the overall complications incidence (2.6% in C-SLPEL Vs 0.11% in M-SLPEL, P=0.03), including pain in inguinal area, knot foreign body reaction, palpable knot, recurrence. Together, these findings suggest that the M-SLPEL procedure is an effective and safe approach, with unique advantage in reducing adverse events in the inguinal region.

scholarly journals Defining the Pros and Cons of Open, Conventional Laparoscopy, and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in a Developing Nation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mrinal Pahwa ◽  
Archna R. Pahwa ◽  
Mohit Girotra ◽  
Rtika Ryfka Abrahm ◽  
Sachin Kathuria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopy ◽  
Drain Removal ◽  
Robotic Pyeloplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Open Pyeloplasty ◽  
Complications Rate

Introduction. Congenital pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) is one of the most common causes of hydronephrosis. Historically, open dismembered pyeloplasty has been considered the gold standard intervention for correcting PUJO. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and functional outcomes of three different approaches, namely, open, conventional laparoscopy, and robotic pyeloplasty.Material and Methods. 60 patients underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty (30 conventional laparoscopies and 30 robotics) for congenital PUJO at a tertiary health center in India. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analyzed. The data of these patients were retrospectively compared with another cohort of 30 patients who had undergone open pyeloplasty.Results. There was significant difference in operative time, time to drain removal, hospital stay, pain score, and complications rate between open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty (P<0.05). SFI was considerably lesser in robotic as compared to conventional laparoscopy. The success rate in OP, CLP, and RP was 93.33, 96.67, and 96.67%.Conclusion. Robotic pyeloplasty is safe, effective, and feasible. It is associated with significantly lesser operative time, lesser blood loss, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and fewer complications. It is also associated with considerably lesser surgeon fatigue as compared to conventional laparoscopy pyeloplasty.

scholarly journals Drainless Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3679
Author(s):  
Luo-Sheng Yong ◽  
Mong-Wei Lin ◽  
Ke-Cheng Chen ◽  
Pei-Ming Huang ◽  
Jang-Ming Lee
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Wedge Resection ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVES: Drainless video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) wedge resection has been demonstrated as feasible in treating various lung diseases. However, it remains unknown whether this surgical technique can be effectively applied to lobectomy. In the current study, we evaluated the perioperative outcome of drainless, minimally invasive lobectomy in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: A total of 26 lung cancer patients who received surgery-performed pulmonary lobectomy were enrolled. The perioperative outcomes were analyzed based on a propensity score matching a comparison with those who had chest drainage. RESULTS: No major surgical morbidity and mortality was noted during the perioperative period. The mean of postoperative hospital stay was 5.08 ± 2.48 days. There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups of patients. However, the presence of significant postoperative pain (VAS score > 30) on the first day after surgery was less in the drainless group (34.6% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that drainless, minimally invasive lobectomy for selected lung cancer patients is feasible. Further evaluation of its impact on short- and long-term surgical outcomes is required in the future.

scholarly journals Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted and Transsternal Thymectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 973-978
Author(s):  
Burcu Ancin ◽  
Mesut Melih Ozercan ◽  
Yigit Yilmaz ◽  
Serkan Uysal ◽  
Ulas Kumbasar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Robotic Thymectomy

Objective: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is a minimally invasive technique that has been used in thymectomy operations in recent years. Minimally invasive surgical techniques offer less postoperative pain, a shorter length of hospital stay, and faster recovery compared to conventional surgical techniques. In our study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of robotic and transsternal thymectomies by analyzing the operative and postoperative data of these two approaches. Methods: Twelve robotic thymectomy patients and 16 transsternal thymectomy patients who were operated on in our clinic in 2018 were included in the study. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time (p=0.231). The median chest tube duration was 1.5 [range, 1-2] days in robotic thymectomy and 2.5 [range, 1-3.75] days in transsternal thymectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.082). The amount of chest tube drainage was significantly lower in the robotic thymectomy group (p=0.006). The length of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in robotic thymectomy patients (p<0.001). Conclusion: The amount of chest tube drainage was lower and the length of hospital stay was shorter in the robotic surgery compared to the transsternal approach. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of operative time. Within today's minimally invasive surgical techniques, robotic thymectomy can be considered a practical, comfortable, and safe technique with better early postoperative outcomes. Keywords: Robot-Assisted Thymectomy, Thymectomy, Transsternal Thymectomy

scholarly journals Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa H. de Vries ◽  
Dilay Aykan ◽  
Lutske Lodewijk ◽  
Johanna A. A. Damen ◽  
Inne H. M. Borel Rinkes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Endoscopic Thyroidectomy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Minimally Invasive Techniques ◽  
Conventional Thyroidectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Invasive Techniques

PurposeConventional thyroidectomy has been standard of care for surgical thyroid nodules. For cosmetic purposes different minimally invasive and remote-access surgical approaches have been developed. At present, the most used robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy approaches are minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), bilateral axillo-breast approach endoscopic thyroidectomy (BABA-ET), bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA-RT), transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOETVA), retro-auricular endoscopic thyroidectomy (RA-ET), retro-auricular robotic thyroidectomy (RA-RT), gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) and robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate whether minimally invasive techniques are not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to identify original articles investigating operating time, length of hospital stay and complication rates regarding recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia, of the different minimally invasive techniques.ResultsOut of 569 identified manuscripts, 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective in nature. The results of the systematic review varied. Thirty-one articles were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to the standard of care, the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in length of hospital stay, except a longer stay after BABA-ET. No significant difference in incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia was seen. As expected, operating time was significantly longer for most minimally invasive techniques.ConclusionsThis is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the eight most commonly used minimally invasive thyroid surgeries individually with standard of care. It can be concluded that minimally invasive techniques do not lead to more complications or longer hospital stay and are, therefore, not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy.

scholarly journals Technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection: an IgoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry-based study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ruzzenente ◽  
◽  
Andrea Ciangherotti ◽  
Luca Aldrighetti ◽  
Giuseppe Maria Ettorre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Caudate Lobe ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

Abstract Background Although isolated caudate lobe (CL) liver resection is not a contraindication for minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), feasibility and safety of the procedure are still poorly investigated. To address this gap, we evaluate data on the Italian prospective maintained database on laparoscopic liver surgery (IgoMILS) and compare outcomes between MILS and open group. Methods Perioperative data of patients with malignancies, as colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), non-colorectal liver metastases (NCRLM) and benign liver disease, were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the potential selection bias for MILS and open group. Results A total of 224 patients were included in the study, 47 and 177 patients underwent MILS and open isolated CL resection, respectively. The overall complication rate was comparable between the two groups; however, severe complication rate (Dindo–Clavien grade ≥ 3) was lower in the MILS group (0% versus 6.8%, P = ns). In-hospital mortality was 0% in both groups and mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MILS group (P = 0.01). After selection of 42 MILS and 43 open CL resections by PSM analysis, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes remained similar except for the hospital stay which was not significantly shorter in MILS group. Conclusions This multi-institutional cohort study shows that MILS CL resection is feasible and safe. The surgical procedure can be technically demanding compared to open resection, whereas good perioperative outcomes can be achieved in highly selected patients.

The Emerging Role of Robotic Single-site Approach for Myomectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062098822
Author(s):  
Eirini Giovannopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Prodromidou ◽  
Nikolaos Blontzos ◽  
Christos Iavazzo
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Minimally Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Robotic Myomectomy ◽  
The Mean

Objective. To review the existing studies on single-site robotic myomectomy and test the safety and feasibility of this innovative minimally invasive technique. Data Sources. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar (from their inception to October 2019), as well as Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to April 2020. Methods of Study Selection. Clinical trials (prospective or retrospective) that reported the outcomes of single-site robotic myomectomy, with a sample of at least 20 patients were considered eligible for the review. Results. The present review was performed in accordance with the guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four (4) studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 267 patients were included with a mean age from 37.1 to 39.1 years and BMI from 21.6 to 29.4 kg/m2. The mean operative time ranged from 131.4 to 154.2 min, the mean docking time from 5.1 to 5.45 min, and the mean blood loss from 57.9 to 182.62 ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, and a conversion rate of 3.8% was reported by a sole study. The overall postoperative complication rate was estimated at 2.2%, and the mean hospital stay ranged from 0.57 to 4.7 days. No significant differences were detected when single-site robotic myomectomy was compared to the multiport technique concerning operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate. Conclusion. Our findings support the safety of single-site robotic myomectomy and its equivalency with the multiport technique on the most studied outcomes. Further studies are needed to conclude on the optimal minimally invasive technique for myomectomy.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary surgery through sternotomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Birla ◽  
P Patel ◽  
G Aresu ◽  
G Asimakopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Opcab Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Introduction Although it is not a new technique, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is employed only by a few surgeons in the UK. We compared our experience with MIDCAB with that of single vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) graft surgery through a standard median sternotomy. Methods Patients who underwent either MIDCAB or OPCAB between April 2008 and July 2011 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria included patients with an ejection fraction of <0.5 or previous cardiac surgery. Data were obtained retrospectively from our prospective database, medical records and through general practitioners. Results Overall, 74 patients were analysed in the MIDCAB group and 78 in the OPCAB group. Their demographics and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) values were comparable (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups in terms of mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, postoperative stroke, wound infection, atrial fibrillation or need for reintervention. The MIDCAB group had six conversions to a sternotomy. Eight patients in each group required blood transfusion, with the average transfusion being 1.8 units in the MIDCAB group and 3.2 units in the OPCAB group. The mean duration of ventilation and intensive care unit stay was 5.0 hours and 38.4 hours in the MIDCAB group and 5.4 and 47.8 hours in the OPCAB group. The mean hospital stay was significantly reduced in the MIDCAB population (6.1 vs 8.5 days, p<0.05). Conclusions MIDCAB can be performed safely in appropriately selected patients with outcomes comparable with OPCAB. The potential benefits include shorter hospital stay, reduced need for blood transfusion and faster recovery.

Risk of Damaging Anatomical Structures During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Correction (Bösch Technique): An Anatomical Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1355-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kaipel ◽  
Lukas Reissig ◽  
Lukas Albrecht ◽  
Stefan Quadlbauer ◽  
Joachim Klikovics ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Metatarsal Osteotomy ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Intensive Training ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Percutaneous, transverse distal metatarsal osteotomy with K-wire fixation (the Bösch technique) is an established technique for hallux valgus correction. Nevertheless, the risk of damaging the anatomical structures during the operation is unknown. Methods: Forty fresh-frozen anatomical foot specimens with hallux valgus deformity underwent a percutaneous corrective procedure. Specimens of group A (n = 20) were operated by an experienced surgeon while specimens of group B (n = 20) were done by untrained residents. Results: The dorsal cutaneous nerve was injured in 1 of 20 cases in group A and 6 of 20 cases in group B ( P = .037). There was a significant difference in overall complication rate between specimens of group A and group B ( P = .043). Conclusions: The results show an increased risk of perioperative injury of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the deep peroneal nerve as well as a significant effect of the surgeon’s experience on the overall complication rate. Clinical Relevance: Results of this study are highly relevant for all surgeons who perform percutaneous, minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery to avoid damage to the peripheral nerves. In addition, the data suggest an intensive training for surgeons before minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery is performed without supervision.

scholarly journals Differences in Surgical Outcome in Near Total Thyroidectomy for Benign Nodular Goiter: A Comparison of LigaSure Vessel Sealer versus Conventional Clamp Knot Tie Technique

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
Shiraz Shaikh ◽  
Champa Sushel ◽  
Ahsan Ali Laghari ◽  
Qamber Ali Laghari ◽  
Zameer Hussain Laghari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Calcium Level ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Nodular Goiter ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Objective: To compare the efficacy of LigaSure Vessel Sealer in Near Total Thyroidectomy versus Conventional Clamp Knot Tie Technique in terms of bleeding, operative time and postoperative drainage. Methodology: This comparative cross sectional study was conducted at Department of Surgery, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro. Study duration was one year from November 2019 to October 2020. All patients of any age with benign multinodular goiter and either of gender were included. The study subjects were grouped into two categories by randomization (odd / even). The odd numbers were given to patients operated for ligasure and even numbers were given to patients operated with conventional clamp knot tie technique.  Outcomes were observed with respect to post-operative calcium level, intra-operative bleeding, operative time, post-operative pain & post-operative hospital stay. All the data was recorded via study proforma. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 20. Results: Total 55 patients were observed. Mean age was 33.25±10.60 years in clamp knot tie procedure group and 35.16±07.96 years in ligasure technique group; without significant difference (p-0.448). Pre and post-operative calcium levels were statistically insignificant among both groups (p-0.358 and 0.163), while loss of blood, hospital stay, post-operative pain and operative duration were significantly greater in clamp knot tie technique group in comparison to ligasure technique group (p-<0.001). Conclusion: LigaSure Vessel Sealer is a feasible and reliable surgical technique and significantly more effective as compared to conventional clamp knot tie technique in terms of post-operative bleeding, operative time, post-operative pain and post-operative hospital stay. However, calcium level was statistically insignificant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document