PSYCHIATRIC POWER, MENTAL ILLNESS, AND THE CLAIM TO THE REAL:

2020 ◽  
pp. 173-197
Author(s):  
Veena Das

This chapter brings out the dark potentials of the everyday by focusing on the madness of a young boy and showing how his illness reverberates in the family and the neighborhood. Canguilhem’s contrast between normatively normal in which norms may be transgressed and those of pathologically normal that signals the death of normativity itself is deployed to show how families become steeped in a scene of trance and illusion and the exhaustion of the capacity to care. The psychiatrist does not represent so much normalizing power as in Foucault but provides simply a small respite from the relentless violence and threats within which the scene of madness is engulfed. The mobile character of power is shown through the residues that are secreted so that when one aspect of power, say its normalizing function as discipline, fades out, another aspect, such as its alignment with sovereign forms of punishment, finds new objects. For Foucault, the archive was the place where individuals who are caught in the grip of the law become available as subjects to the historian, but for the anthropologist, the life of law flows through different kind of hinges and junctions that are not exhausted by the archive.


1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 380-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Ramsay

Broadcast media can powerfully influence the way we view the world. Journalists drawn to sensational news items do not necessarily portray the real situation they are describing. Often they strengthen belief in stereotyped images, such as the ‘mad axeman’. Yet they have the potential to foster greater public understanding of mental illness and a more responsible attitude to sufferers.


Author(s):  
Anna M Noworol OV ◽  

The article presents the issues of cooperation between psychiatrists and exorcist priests, taking into account the psychiatrist, exorcist priest, patient, and the unusual disease of possession, paying particular attention to when and why the cooperation is essential. And it is necessary mainly in difficult cases of possession. Possession does not only exist as another mental illness; possession is a parapsychological disease, an unusual disease in which supernatural phenomena occur, and is therefore more than a patient’s conviction that he or she will be subjected to demons. Possession is the real seizure of the possessed body by an evil spirit. Possession needs a specific diagnosis and treatment, by a unique specialist, which is an exorcist priest. For the work of exorcist priests, it is very important the cooperation with psychiatrists, who recognize and treat cases of pseudo-possessions and mental illnesses that may coexist with possessions. The article also points out when psychiatrists should refer patients to an exorcist priest. The golden rule turns out to be to give the psychiatrist what belongs to psychiatrists, and to the exorcist priest what belongs to exorcists.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 573-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Shafrin ◽  
Katalin Bognar ◽  
Katie Everson ◽  
Michelle Brauer ◽  
Darius N Lakdawalla ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Federico Leoni

This chapter explores Michel Foucault's contribution to a critical assessment of modern and contemporary psychiatric practice. It focuses firstly on theHistory of Madness(1961): the social, political, cultural, epistemological construction of the object "psychiatric patient" and "psychiatric pathology"; the gradual historical shift from "madness" to "psychiatric pathology" and its social and epistemological consequences; the horizons and limits of the romantic task Foucault assumes on this basis (namely, the idea of letting the voice of madness come back and speak again, "under" the language and categories of medical knowledge); the critique Jacques Derrida formulated (Writing and Difference, 1967) about this project, and particularly about Foucault's reading of Descartes. Secondly, it examines Foucault's course onPsychiatric Power(1975), focusing on the sociopolitical consequences of this medicalization process: i.e., the construction of the object "psychiatric patient" as "disciplinated bodies", and the general context of this anthropological metamorphosis Foucault studied in his booksDiscipline and Punish,The Will to Knowledge, and in his courseNaissance de la biopolitique(namely, the shift, during the last two centuries, from a disciplinary model to a biopolitical model of power and, more specifically, of administration of mental illness and mental health).


Worldview ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 11-13
Author(s):  
William V. O'Brien

Two paragraphs of Schema XIII, on the Church and the Modern World, have been briefly debated by the Vatican Council and will be considered when it reconvenes. They bring to mind the following parable: Once there was a parent whose son was a chronic juvenile delinquent. Early on the boy displayed spectacular anti-social tendencies and everyone urged that the professional advice of psychiatrists be solicited and followed. But for nineteen years the parent avoided a showdown, only occasionally facing the real problem. Rather, his concern took the form of deploring and attempting to deal only with the manifestations of bis son's underlying mental illness. Finally, in despair, the father took the son to the first psychiatrist who was available for a half-hour interview.


2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICK W. CORRIGAN ◽  
JOHN R. O'SHAUGHNESSY

1998 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. 13-21
Author(s):  
Borislav Kapamadžija

We presented a case of brutal murder in the condition of pathological reaction to alcohol. The author also gives a brief view of forensic-psychiatric literature data on this problem. The conclusion is that clinical descriptions are not precise in details which makes certain unsecurity and confusion in expert witness. The problem is more complicated with the fact that these conditions mostly last for a short period o f time and are transitory, so that expert witness see a man of normal psychic condition. Diagnosis of pathological reaction to alcohol automatically includes the judgement of total inaccountability which is seldom accepted both in criminal law and in public. In that situation expert witness feels insecure, being aware of the reaction of jurisdiction and public to such an expertise. That is the reason why they often are not precisly defined in literature data and have not enough professional and social sourage to make the diagnosis of total inaccountability. Inspite of all these imprécisions, such conditions have some things in common: they are not common and well known condition of "drunkeness" but they present conditions of true psychosis (mental illness) with transitory character. Although we know that alcohol is only the provocative factor, the real cause of these conditions still remains unknown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document