Postoperative groin pain in patients operated with different surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair

Chirurgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damir Grebić ◽  
Nuša Naglič ◽  
Željka Mijolović
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Groin Pain ◽  
Surgical Techniques

Overview of Modern Surgical Techniques in Inguinal Hernia Repair

2017 ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Arthur I. Gilbert ◽  
Jerrold Young ◽  
Rafael Azuaje
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Surgical Techniques

scholarly journals The Onstep Method for Inguinal Hernia Repair: Operative Technique and Technical Tips

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Rosenberg ◽  
Kristoffer Andresen
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Operative Technique ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Full Description ◽  
Tips And Tricks ◽  
Promising Technique

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures and several different surgical techniques are available. The Onstep method is a new promising technique. The technique is simple with a number of straightforward steps. This paper provides a full description of the technique together with tips and tricks to make it easy and without complications.

scholarly journals A comparative study of postoperative chronic pain after tension free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable versus non absorbable sutures for mesh fixation

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laxmi Narayan Meena ◽  
Somendra Bansal ◽  
Pradeep Verma ◽  
Rohit Rai
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Groin Pain ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Absorbable Sutures ◽  
Common Diagnosis

Background: Inguinal hernia is a one of common diagnosis which is frequently encountered in routine clinical practice. The Lichtenstein technique (tension free mesh repair) is currently the gold standard in open inguinal hernia repair. Currently chronic groin pain (Inguinodynia) is one of the common complications after hernia repair and it may affect quality of life and it has been reported in 16% to 62% of the patients.Methods: This prospective, randomized study was conducted in the department of general surgery in S.M.S. Medical College and attached group of hospitals, Jaipur from May 2014 to December 2015. All patients of 18-80 years old, who were admitted for elective inguinal hernia repair, were included for the study. Patients with bilateral, recurrent, irreducible or incarcerated hernia, pregnant patients and patients with co morbid conditions, were excluded from the study.Results: Mean age was 46.5 years in absorbable group and 45.4 years in non absorbable group. Male to female ratio was 142:13 in absorbable group and 143:12 in non absorbable group. Post operative pain was measured by VAS score. Mean postoperative pain (VAS score) was lower in absorbable sutures group as compared to non absorbable group at 3 months (0.92±0.879 vs. 1.23±1.2; p=0.013) and at 6 months (0.48±0.57 vs. 0.77±0.65; p≤0.001), which was significant.Conclusions: Patients with absorbable suture for mesh fixation has less groin pain as compared to non-absorbable suture in hernia repair during 6 months follow up period.

TP7.2.12 Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Imsirovic ◽  
Rahul Bagga ◽  
Mansoor Khan ◽  
Krishna Singh ◽  
Parv Sains ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Groin Pain ◽  
Chronic Groin Pain ◽  
Duration Of Operation

Abstract Aims Robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) is considered to improve surgical outcomes in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery. The objective is to present a systematic review of RIHR compared to laparoscopic repair (LIHR). Methods A systematic review of comparative studies until January 2021 published on Embase, Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central and Cochrane databases reporting the surgical outcomes in patients undergoing RIHR versus LIHR was performed. Results A total of 12565 patients in 10 comparative studies were included. In the random effects model analysis using the statistical software Review Manager, statistically the RIHR prolonged the duration of operation (Standardized mean difference (SMD), 3.33; z = 5.84; P = 0.00001) but the length of stay (SMD, -0.8; z = 0.66; P = 0.51) and post-operative pain score (SMD, -0.47; z = 1.19; P = 0.24) were similar in both groups. In addition, the recurrence rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.92). The incidence of post-operative complications (OR 1.67; 95% CI, 1.14, 2.45; z = 2.64; P = 0.008) and chronic groin pain (OR 2.14; 95% CI, 0.97, 4.72; z = 1.88; P = 0.06) was higher in RIHR group. Conclusion RIHR is feasible and safe, but the duration of operation is significantly longer with equivocal other variables such as stay and pain score. There was higher incidence of post-operative morbidity and chronic groin pain as well. Major multi-center randomized controlled trial is mandatory to assess the long terms outcomes and cost effectiveness before the routine use of RIHR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document