Radiological Evaluation of Primary Brain Tumors Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2016 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 505-508
Author(s):  
Khulod Alsaadi ◽  
◽  
Amal Alkhaldi ◽  
Fahad Alhazmi ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Radiological Evaluation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Primary Brain Tumors

scholarly journals Neuromorphometry of primary brain tumors by magnetic resonance imaging

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 024503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidiyare Hevia-Montiel ◽  
Pedro I. Rodriguez-Perez ◽  
Paul J. Lamothe-Molina ◽  
Alfonso Arellano-Reynoso ◽  
Ernesto Bribiesca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Primary Brain Tumors

scholarly journals Uncommon Cause of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Tentorial Ossification over Trigeminal Notch

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Sun Woo Bang ◽  
Kyung Ream Han ◽  
Seung Ho Kim ◽  
Won Ho Jeong ◽  
Eun Jin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Radiological Evaluation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Tentorium Cerebelli ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Ossification of the tentorium cerebelli over the trigeminal notch is rare, but it may cause compression of the trigeminal nerve, leading to trigeminal neuralgia (TN). We were unable to find any previously reported cases with radiological evaluation, although we did find one case with surgically proven ossification of the tentorium cerebelli. Here, we present a case of TN caused by tentorial ossification over the trigeminal notch depicted on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT).

scholarly journals Simultaneous 11C-Methionine Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Suspected Primary Brain Tumors

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e0167596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelius Deuschl ◽  
Sophia Goericke ◽  
Johannes Grueneisen ◽  
Lino Morris Sawicki ◽  
Juliane Goebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Primary Brain Tumors ◽  
Positron Emission

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FEATURES OF PRIMARY BRAIN TUMORS IN DOGS

1996 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Thomas ◽  
Simon J. Wheeler ◽  
Robert Kramer ◽  
Joe N. Kornegay
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Primary Brain Tumors

Xác định thể tích chiếu xạ các khối u não dựa vào hình ảnh cắt lớp vi tính và cộng hưởng từ

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuong Pham Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Cerebral Edema ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Bone Changes

Purpose: Compare Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to accurately determine the volume of brain tumors for radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Cross-sectional descriptive study on 38 patients with brain tumors indicated for radiation therapy, underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging and CT scans at Hue Central Hospital from January 2018 to July 2019. Data processed with MS Excel 2013, SPSS 20.0 and statistical algorithms. Results: The Magnetic Resonance Imaging has a rate of brain tumor detection of 100% while that of computed tomography only reached 60.5%. The average difference in tumor size is 0.66 cm, the size of the tumor is larger on the magnetic resonance images. There is a close agreement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and computer tomography on the level of cerebral edema (kappa = 0.735, p <0.001), on the amount of mid line shift of the tumor (kappa = 0.775, p <0.001); and detected cocoons in tumor (kappa = 1.000, p <0.001). Conclusions: Magnetic Resonance has advantages over computed tomography in the ability to detect brain tumors, tumor margin, the ability to detect the level of cerebral edema, invasive properties and identify cocoons in tumors. Computed Tomography is more advantageous than Magnetic Resonance in cases with calcification in the tumors or bone changes. Fusing computed tomography images and Magnetic Resonance Imaging together is a more effective method of determining the volume of brain tumors for radiotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document