scholarly journals Ex Uno Lapide: The making present of absence

Author(s):  
Konrad Buhagiar ◽  
Guillaume Dreyfuss ◽  
Ephraim Joris Joris

This paper comments on a drawing protocol entitled the “Monolith Drawing”, with which an architectural figure is extracted out of a single volume, synchronising analogue thinking with computational development, to enter history through our capacity to long for the experience of something that is absent. The Lacanian interpretation assumes there cannot be absence in an objective world, for absence can only exist through symbolic or representative means. It is through the representational means of the Monolith Drawing that we enable ourselves, as architects, to design presence where there is none. This research explores and (re)deploys the notion of ex uno lapide in contemporary architectural production. Such creative practice recovers a tradition linking geology with architectonic drawing and operates in conceptual space through means of contained sets of formal operations to generate a particular kind of architecture. The Monolith Drawing is here explained in relation to the design of a museum extension to house a tapestry cycle by Peter Paul Rubens, adjacent to St John’s Co-Cathedral in Valletta. These tapestries represent the idea of transubstantiation. In response, the museum’s design acts as a closed vessel, a monumental reliquary, enabling a closed and controlled environment to ensure the conservation of the artwork. The reliquary is interpreted as a container of meaning, directing a reciprocal gaze towards the idea of meaningful absence. The Monolith Drawing installs two important principles. The idea of the mirror-construct, in which an object is depicted using parallel lines to project its mirror image and allow twofold vision, outwards (res extensa) and inwards (res cogitans); and the idea of ex uno lapide – a strategy where architecture is carved out of solid mass. This carving is guided by allowing the depicted object and its mirror image to intersect. Its transcriptions allow for a drawing with history; a tracing of its own tracing.  

Thesis Eleven ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-109
Author(s):  
Marko Hočevar

The article explores the specific conception of art developed by Danko Grlić, a prominent member of the Yugoslav Praxis School. Grlić conceptualised art beyond both aesthetic norms and technological determinism. Within the context of praxis philosophy, a distinct theory of the subject and a Marxist humanist approach, he reconceptualised art as a distinct type of praxis, a revolutionary and creative practice of changing existing living conditions. The article explains how his unique understanding of art leads Grlić to analyse, criticise and refute various Marxist approaches to art: art as an ideology, art as a reflection of the objective world, art as sociological analysis. Moreover, while sharing many ideas and conceptions with Walter Benjamin’s materialist conception of art, Grlić reached the point where he became critical due to Benjamin’s belief in technology concerning processes of emancipation, which Grlić viewed with scepticism.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Igor Frank ◽  
Bradley C. Leibovich ◽  
Christine M. Lohse ◽  
Horst Zincke ◽  
Michael L. Blute

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Davenport
Keyword(s):  

1968 ◽  
Vol 70 (6, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 782-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon G. Gallup
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thitaporn Chaisilprungraung ◽  
Joseph German ◽  
Michael McCloskey
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document