Behavior of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) in a land-use mosaic: conservation implications for human-elephant coexistence in the Anamalai hills, India

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ananda kumar Mavatur ◽  
Mewa Singh
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-404
Author(s):  
Luechai KROUTNOI ◽  
Thavivongse SRIBURI ◽  
Saowanee WIJITKOSUM ◽  
Kamol NUANYAI

Wild Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) disturbances are a major conservation concern in Thailand. Elephant dispersal was observed to identify factors that encouraged seasonal migration from the Kaeng Krachan National Park (KKNP), of 466.24 hectares across, into adjacent agricultural lands at the Pa Deng sub-district (PDS) in Phetchchaburi Province, Thailand. Land use patterns in 1975, 1992, 2002, and 2011 from satellite images taken by Landsat-5 TM, and community attitudes on the impacts of land disturbance, were analyzed. All village chiefs were concerned about future management for living with the increased numbers of elephants strolling in their lands expanding from the KKNP border. In 1975, the area was almost completely forested, but chronologically changed to agricultural and community area by 6.43, 8.34, and 7.35 % for 1992, 2002, and 2011, respectively. The area of bare land and natural water courses was found to be reformed to 8.86, 3.46, and 1.38 %, in 1992, 2002, and 2011, respectively. It was concluded that community and agricultural development encroached upon the bare lands and water courses of elephants, and latterly interrupted elephant trails by forest fragmentation. Six elephant trails were found to be aligned east/west across KKNP into surrounding water reservoirs and agricultural lands, at 170 to 380 m above mean sea level (AMSL), at a slope of less than 10 %, and within a radius of 100 - 300 m from communities. Along those trails, data of line transects revealed indirect evidence, 70 dung piles, 27 feeding signs, and 26 footprints. They were directed to major water resources, e.g., the Deng, Paloa, and Kralang reservoirs. It can be concluded that an important factor influencing the elephant dispersal were water sources located at the border of conserved forest; therefore, water development for elephants in KKNP was recommended, using local community-based natural resource management.


Oryx ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Lauren J. Hale ◽  
Kun Shi ◽  
Tania C. Gilbert ◽  
Kelvin S.-H. Peh ◽  
Philip Riordan

Abstract The Asian elephant Elephas maximus is at risk of extinction as a result of anthropogenic pressures, and remaining populations are often small and fragmented remnants, occupying a fraction of the species' former range. Once widely distributed across China, only a maximum of 245 elephants are estimated to survive across seven small populations. We assessed the Asian elephant population in Nangunhe National Nature Reserve in Lincang Prefecture, China, using camera traps during May–July 2017, to estimate the population size and structure of this genetically important population. Although detection probability was low (0.31), we estimated a total population size of c. 20 individuals, and an effective density of 0.39 elephants per km2. Social structure indicated a strong sex ratio bias towards females, with only one adult male detected within the population. Most of the elephants associated as one herd but three adult females remained separate from the herd throughout the trapping period. These results highlight the fragility of remnant elephant populations such as Nangunhe and we suggest options such as a managed metapopulation approach for their continued survival in China and more widely.


1990 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ossent ◽  
F. Guscetti ◽  
A. E. Metzler ◽  
E. M. Lang ◽  
A. Rübel ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imke Lueders ◽  
Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt ◽  
Charles Gray ◽  
Stephan Botha ◽  
Peter Rich ◽  
...  

AMBIO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Montgomery ◽  
Jamie Raupp ◽  
Methodius Mukhwana ◽  
Ashley Greenleaf ◽  
Tutilo Mudumba ◽  
...  

AbstractBoth African elephants (Loxodonta spp.) and the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) across their range come into conflict with people because of their crop-raiding behavior, which presents profound impediments to farmer livelihoods. In response, a series of interventions, designed to reduce elephant crop raiding have been applied. Based on an extensive review of elephant crop-raiding studies published over a 31-year period, we identified four primary categories of interventions including: (i) detection efforts; (ii) preemptive measures; (iii) fencing and trenches; and (iv) deterrent techniques. The interventions reported to be most effective involved chili peppers (i.e., fences, spray, and briquettes) and crop guarding coupled with deterrents. The extent to which these interventions can be applied more widely is unclear as only two studies examined efficacy across sites in more than one country. Thus, future inquiry should evaluate the ability of effective interventions, or indeed a combination of interventions, to be applied across the range of elephants to reduce crop raiding at scale.


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Wong ◽  
Ramiro Isaza ◽  
J. Kelly Cuthbert ◽  
Dennis E. Brooks ◽  
Don A. Samuelson

2004 ◽  
Vol 80 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 329-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.H. Graham ◽  
J. Bando ◽  
C. Gray ◽  
M.M. Buhr

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document