scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris Yang Tidak Mendaftarkan dan Melaporkan Akta Wasiat Ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Annisa Annisa ◽  
Yanis Rinaldi ◽  
Teuku Abdurahman
Keyword(s):  
Legal Research ◽  
Online System ◽  
Central Register ◽  
The Will ◽  
Notary Public

Salah satu kewenangan Notaris adalah membuat akta wasiat yang juga harus diiringi dengan tanggung jawab untuk mendaftarkan dan melaporkan ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat. Notaris yang tidak membuat akta wasiat juga harus melaporkan laporan nihil pada waktu 5 (lima) hari pada minggu pertama setiap bulan berikutnya. Namun pada kenyataannya, masih banyak Notaris yang tidak menjalankan kewajibannya tersebut. Data tersebut berdasarkan laporan bulanan yang masuk ke dalam online sistem Pusat Wasiat Subdirektorat Harta Peninggalan Direktorat Perdata (2015) terdapat sekitar 4.000 (empat ribu) Notaris yang secara rutin melakukan laporan bulanan, padahal jumlah Notaris di seluruh Indonesia pada saat itu mencapai sekitar 15.000 (lima belas ribu). Penelitian ini menganalisis tanggung jawab Notaris yang tidak mendaftarkan dan melaporkan akta wasiat ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif atau yuridis.A job duty of a Notary public is to notarize a will. Notarial Acts of Notarizing a will should include registering and reporting the will to the Central Register of Wills. Even though a Notary public legalizes no will in a month, she or he still has to make a nil report in the first five days of the next month. However, in fact there were still Notaries who did not perform the duties. Based on the data of monthly reports in the online system of Central Register of Wills (2015), only 4000 out of 15000 Notaries in Indonesia regularly submitted their monthly reports. The objective of this research was to identify the liability of any notary who did not register and report the will. This normative legal research was conducted by means of a statute approach.

scholarly journals Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pembuatan/ Pencabutan Surat Wasiat (Testament)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Agus Wahyu Suniayasa ◽  
I Nyoman Sumardika ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Central Register ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Will ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Materials Used

Humans are social creatures which in their lives always need help from those around them even though that person is about to die. Therefore, a person while away from death has the desire to arrange an inheritance which may be passed on to his offspring. After a person passed away, this wealth can cause problems in the family and society. So rules and solutions are needed according to applicable and permanent laws which refer to the appropriate Law. For example, if someone's message is to be revealed, it can be written into an authentic will deed made by a notary public which is commonly called a will or testament. This study aimed to reveal how the authority of the notary in making a will or testament and how the duties and authority of the notary in the event of execution of wills or if there is revocation of wills. This research employed a normative method and is studied with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, which are processed and analyzed descriptively. The results of this study indicated that the notary has the authority to keep a will as a written or closed will and is entitled and obliged to report the will to Balai Harta Peninggalan in the area where the notary serves. In addition, if the testator changes the contents of his will, the notary must report the matter to the Central Register of Wills.

scholarly journals Proposing Notaries’ Deed Digitalization in Indonesia: A Legal Perspective

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Ika Yuli Agustin ◽  
Ghansham Anand
Keyword(s):  
Technological Development ◽  
Electronic System ◽  
Emerging Technology ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Online System ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
The Future ◽  
Notary Public

Along with emerging technology, a notary public's role should adjust this changing development, mainly dealing with a deed. Technological development inevitably impacts the role of a notary public and the future digitization of notarial deeds. To date, notaries in Indonesia remain implementing laws and regulations that have not been changed. In contrast, technological development has shifted rapidly, especially on the notaries' task in appearing, reading, signing, and using stamps. This study aimed to identify the challenges of implementing notaries’ deed digitalization by taking into account rapid technological development. With legal research, this study showed that as a consequence of technological development, notarial functions’ disruption in Indonesia evoked a concept of a cyber notary, an idea of notarial function through an online system. As it has flourished globally, digital disruptions had brought out an electronic system that changed the implementation of works, business, professions, and functions, mainly to notarial functions. Nevertheless, no specific rules were established to amend Notary Law 02/2014, particularly to the requisites of authentic deeds by a cyber notary. Indonesia applied some restrictions on technology to maintain the legality of authentic deeds to place the notarial profession as a public official consistently. KEYWORDS: Indonesian Notaries, Technological Development, Deed Digitalization.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The People ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Legal Consequences

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.

scholarly journals “My Conscience is Free and Clear”:African-Descended Women, Status, and Slave Owning in Mid-Colonial Mexico

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Terrazas Williams
Keyword(s):  
Seventeenth Century ◽  
Colonial Mexico ◽  
The Will ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Last Will And Testament

On March 8, 1679, Polonia de Ribas entered her last will and testament into record at the offices of Alonso de Neira Claver, the royal notary public of Xalapa. The will included information about Polonia's family, possessions, debts to be collected, and how she wanted her estate distributed after her passing. She was well acquainted with the appropriate processes and venues to ensure that such matters were officially acknowledged. In the second half of the seventeenth century, Polonia demonstrated her legal acumen by documenting half a dozen transactions with the notary public in Xalapa.

scholarly journals DEGRADASI AKTA OTENTIK YANG TIDAK DILAKUKAN PENANDATANGANAN PARA PIHAK SECARA BERSAMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Dian Dharmayanti ◽  
Rr Asfarina Izazi Razan ◽  
Nahdlotul Fadilah
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Will ◽  
High Integrity ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Take All ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<em>Notary is a general officer authorized to create an authentic deed of all actions, agreements, and statutes required by the laws and/or regulations required by the interested to be expressed in the deed Authentically, guaranteeing the certainty of the date of the deed, storing the deed, giving Grosee, copies and quotations of the deed, all of them throughout the making of the deed were not also assigned or excluded to the other officers stipulated by the law. Thus, it is described in article 1 number 1 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the amendment to law Number 30 year 2004 concerning the Notary Regulation (Hereinafter called UUJN). A notary public is a noble, independent and high integrity position, so it is only natural to take all actions in their position seriously referring to the laws and regulations and the code of ethics. The law actions of the parties as described in the notarial deed is purely wishes of the parties and the notary is limited to providing law counseling related to the contents of the deed and the law actions of the parties, without imposing the will of the parties. party or in favor of one party. After the deed is made and then read out in front of the parties and witnesses, it must be signed when it is signed by all parties present and witnesses as well, it becomes one of the notary obligations stipulated in UUJN.</em>

scholarly journals Harmonisasi Kewenangan Pembuatan Risalah Lelang Antara Notaris Dengan Pejabat Lelang

Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Ni Made Ayu Sintya Dewi ◽  
Made Gde Subha Karma Resen
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Concept Of Law ◽  
Law And Legislation ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia ◽  
Concept Of Law

This journal’s purpose is to understand the harmonization of authority arrangements for making auction minutes and to find out the evidentiary strength of auction minutes. This research uses normative legal research with an approach to the concept of law and legislation. Based on the lex special derogate legi generale principle, the authority to prepare auction minutes is based on Staatsblad No. 189 which was promulgated in 1908 concerning Vendu Reglement / VR (hereinafter referred to as Tender Regulations) which regulate the authority to make Minutes of Auction rests with the Auction Officer not the Notary Public. Although a Notary Public can be appointed as Class II Auction Officer according to Article 7 the Vendue Intructie in Indonesian is called an auction instruction Jo. Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 175 / PMK.06 / 2010 concerning Class II Auction Officers (hereinafter referred to as PMK Class II Auction Officers), however this authority is given the capacity of a Notary as Class II Auction Officer and not the capacity as a Notary. The power of proof of the auction minutes according to Article 1868 of the Criminal Code, the minutes of auction fulfilling the three elements of the deed must be made by a General Official, the deed is determined by law and the General Official who makes it must be authorized to make the deed so that it is said that the Minutes of Auction are authentic deeds having the power of proof that perfect.   Tujuan jurnal ini yaitu untuk memahmi harmonisasi pengaturan kewenangan Pembuatan Risalah Lelang dan untuk mengetahui kekuatan pembuktian risalah lelang. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konsep hukum dan perundang-undangan. Berdasarkan asas lex special derogate legi generale pengaturan kewenangan Pembuatan Risalah Lelang adalah berdasarkan Staatsblad No. 189 yang diundangkan pada tahun 1908 tentang Vendu Reglement/VR (selanjutnya disebut Peraturan Lelang) yang mengatur kewenangan membuat Risalah Lelang terdapat pada Pejabat Lelang bukan pada Notaris. Walaupun Notaris dapat diangkat sebagai Pejabat Lelang Kelas II menurut Pasal 7 Vendue Intructie dalam bahasa Indonesia disebut Intruksi lelang Jo. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 175/PMK.06/2010 tentang Pejabat Lelang Kelas II (selanjutnya disebut PMK Pejabat Lelang Kelas II), namun wewenang itu diberikan kapasitas Notaris sebagai Pejabat Lelang Kelas II dan bukan kapasitasnya sebagai Notaris. Kekuatan pembuktian risalah lelang menurut Pasal 1868 KUHPer, Risalah lelang memenuhi ketiga unsur akta itu harus dibuat seorang  Pejabat Umum, akta  itu  ditentukan oleh undang-undang dan Pejabat  Umum  yang membuat harus  berwenang membuat akta tersebut sehingga dikatakan Risalah Lelang merupakan akta otentik memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang sempurna.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Atas Pembuatan Akta Oleh Penghadap Yang Dinyatakan Palsu (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Vitto Odie Prananda
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Public Environment

<p>Permasalahan yang sering terjadi berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan tugas jabatan Notaris adalah jika ada akta Notaris yang dipersalahkan oleh para pihak terlebih jika para pihak datang kepada Notaris dengan memberikan keterangan palsu atau menggunakan alat bukti palsu dalam pembuatan akta. Hal ini membuat Notaris dikaitkan sebagai pihak yang turut serta melakukan suatu tindak pidana. Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut tentang keabsahan akta notaris yang didasarkan pada alat bukti yang dinyatakan palsu dan<em> ratio decidendi </em>Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006 Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akta Notaris yang didasarkan pada alat bukti yang dinyatakan palsu adalah batal demi hukum. Notaris tidak berwenang untuk mengkaji sah atau tidaknya Surat Kuasa di bawah tangan dan Notaris tidak bertanggungjawab secara dipidana atas akta yang dibuatnya meskipun pembuatan akta tersebut didasarkan pada alat bukti palsu.</p><p> </p><p>Issues that are commonly occur within notary public environment is concerning fake information given by client. Numerous clients commonly provide fake information and evidence in order to achieve their goals in making notarial deed published by notary public. This condition makes notary public alleged as party that conducting criminal act. The present research tries to analyze further about validity of notarial deed that is based on fake information or evidence provide by the client. Moreover, the present study tries to ratio decidendi of Indonesia Supreme Court No 385 K/PID/2006 The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. The present study concludes that notarial deed based on fake information or evidence provided by the client is canceled. Notary public is not obliged to examine validity of information coupled with evidence provided by the client. Furthermore, notary public is not responsible for criminal act although he/she publishes notarial deed with fake information or evidence provided by the client.</p>

scholarly journals Sanksi Terhadap Penerima Fidusia Yang Tidak Menghapuskan Jaminan Fidusia Elektronik

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
I Putu Budi Arta Yama ◽  
I Made Udiana
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of carrying out the elimination of related fiduciary guarantees so that objects that are used as fiduciary collateral objects with the debt fiduciary debt paid off, then the object can be re-registered the same fiduciary guarantee. In the regulations regarding Fiduciary Guarantees namely Law Number 42 of 1999 does not regulate sanctions against parties who are given the mandate by statutory regulations to abolish fiduciary guarantees. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the sanctions against those appointed by the laws and regulations that do not abolish electronic fiduciary guarantees and who can eliminate electronic fiduciary guarantees. This study applies a method which is normative legal research and the approach is the statutory approach. The result of this research is that the sanction given is civil sanction, in the form of a claim for compensation which refers to the provisions of Article 1365 of the Civil Code and the party that can carry out the removal of fiduciary guarantees ie is a fiduciary recipient either through his power of attorney or representative, the attorney referred to is a Notary Public.

PENERAPAN ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA PADA TESTAMENT YANG DIBUAT DI HADAPAN NOTARIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
Syaeful Bahri ◽  
Jawade Hafidz
Keyword(s):  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Equal Rights ◽  
Economic Disparities ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
The Will ◽  
Notary Public

The research entitled The Application of Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle In Testament Made Before Notary in Perspective of Justice has problem formulation: 1) How is the application of pacta sunt servanda principle on testaments made before the present notary ?, 2) What legal effect arises when The testamen made before the notary does not apply the principle of pacta sunt servanda in the perspective of justice? And 3) How is the application of pacta sunt servanda principle to testament made before Notary in the perspective of justice ?.The results of this research are 1) The application of pacta sunt servanda principle on testaments made before the present notary can be described that the implementation of pacta sunt servanda principle is required at all stages, either before, during or after the process of making the testament deed. 2) Any legal effect that arises when a testament made before a notary public does not apply the principle of pacta sunt servanda in the perspective of justice is that the testament is essentially a statement made unilaterally by the testamenter set forth in a deed that must be executed by the will . 3) The application of the principle of pacta sunt servanda to the testament made before the Notary in the perspective of justice is that in the making of this testament it must be adhered to two principles namely, firstly, giving equal rights and opportunities to the widest freedom of the broadest extent of equal freedom for each person. Second, able to reorganize the socio-economic disparities that occur so as to provide mutual benefits.Keywords: Pakta Azmen Sunt Servanda, Testament

PENGATURAN PELAKSANAAN PASAL 209 KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM TENTANG WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP ANAK ANGKAT MELALUI AKTA YANG DIBUAT NOTARIS DALAM BENTUK NOTARIIL

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Yanuar Dwiyan Putra ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Will ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Mandatory Provision

Research on "Implementation Arrangement of Article 209 Compilation of Islamic Law About Testament Required To Child Lift Through Notary Act Notarized In Notarial Form" aims To know and analyze the basic law of mandatory testament to adopted child in terms of Islamic inheritance law and Compilation of Islamic Law, To know and analyzing the legal consequences of the mandatory provision of the adopted child, To know and analyze the notary's responsibility as a mandatory certificate deed for adopted children.The basis of the law of provision of natural must must be preceded by the love and affection of adoptive parents to adopted children, so that parents want to be fair to their adopted children. The will is basically only given to the heirs who do not receive the inheritance due to being heaved by the heirs who are closer to the heirs. Provision of a mandatory will to an adopted child if it is based on Article 209 paragraph (2) of the Compilation of Islamic Law shall not cause any legal consequences resulting in a dispute between the adopted child and the principal heir of the heir. Because in Article 209 paragraph (2) Compilation of Islamic Law explains "Against adopted child who does not receive will is given a will as much as 1/3 of the inheritance of his adoptive parents". Notary besides being responsible in making the deed of will is also responsible in its implementation.Keywords: Wills Wajibah, Adopted Children, Compilation of Islamic Law, Notary Public

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document