scholarly journals Medical Student Selection

Author(s):  
Leila E Harrison ◽  
Radha Nandagopal

This is included in the attached word document   Many medical schools rely solely on their Admissions Committee members or core faculty for all aspects of the admissions process. In a distributed campus model, involving stakeholders from different contexts and campuses, can help medical schools diversify the participants in each step of the admissions process, from recruitment, to screening, to interviewing, to selection. Using the regional campus structure poses an advantage to embed multiple constituents, including faculty, staff, and community members, into the entire process supporting collective input in training future physicians for those communities and provides the opportunity for more people to become aware of institutional missions and to become invested in the holistic review framework used for candidate selection. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This work does require human subjects review.

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Adam ◽  
Jon Dowell ◽  
Rachel Greatrix

2021 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-652
Author(s):  
Ian Kratzke ◽  
Muneera R. Kapadia ◽  
Fumiko Egawa ◽  
Jennifer S. Beaty

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Crump

A regional campus dean reflects on his recent acquisition of a new clinical responsibility as medical support to an inpatient behavioral health unit.  Having taught the neurological exam to students for almost 35 years, this experience caused him to pause and consider a new perspective on teaching the routine exam. The author has no conflict of interest to report and IRB approval for Treatment of Human Subjects and Treatment of Animal Subjects is not applicable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 238212052093661
Author(s):  
Julie S Byerley ◽  
Johanna H Foster ◽  
Gary L Beck Dallaghan

Background: Given increasing class sizes and desires to keep costs down, many medical schools are developing regional clinical campuses. We found our regional campus system to be very successful in allowing class size expansion, inspiring a workforce for the state, and concurrently allowing our students to individualize their experience. We desire to articulate our experience, with a review of the relevant evidence, with the goal of assisting other medical schools in their efforts to develop regional medical campuses. Methods: We conducted a narrative literature review to identify considerations for developing regional campuses, taking into consideration our experiences in the process. A medical librarian undertook a literature search for the purposes of this narrative review. Results: Of the 61 articles identified, 14 were included for full-text review. Five facets on branch campus development were identified: relationships, infrastructure, curriculum, recruitment, and accreditation. Within each of these facets we provide further details based on findings from the literature complemented by our experience. Conclusions: Launching a regional campus requires building relationships with clinical partners, ensuring an infrastructure that supports student need and accreditation, comparable curriculum with the same objectives and assessment measures, and aspects of the experience that inspire a student desire to learn in that setting. We share our experience in building successful branch campuses, which have added significantly to our large public school of medicine and its service to our state.


BMJ ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 296 (6631) ◽  
pp. 1261-1261
Author(s):  
D. A Powis ◽  
R. L B Neame ◽  
T. Bristow ◽  
L B. Murphy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document