Control Co-Design Optimization: Integrating nonlinear controllability into a multidisciplinary design process

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torbjørn Cunis ◽  
Ilya V. Kolmanovsky ◽  
Carlos E. Cesnik
Author(s):  
Dongqin Li ◽  
Yifeng Guan ◽  
Qingfeng Wang ◽  
Zhitong Chen

The design of ship is related to several disciplines such as hydrostatic, resistance, propulsion and economic. The traditional design process of ship only involves independent design optimization within each discipline. With such an approach, there is no guarantee to achieve the optimum design. And at the same time improving the efficiency of ship optimization is also crucial for modem ship design. In this paper, an introduction of both the traditional ship design process and the fundamentals of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) theory are presented and a comparison between the two methods is carried out. As one of the most frequently applied MDO methods, Collaborative Optimization (CO) promotes autonomy of disciplines while providing a coordinating mechanism guaranteeing progress toward an optimum and maintaining interdisciplinary compatibility. However there are some difficulties in applying the conventional CO method, such as difficulties in choosing an initial point and tremendous computational requirements. For the purpose of overcoming these problems, Design Of Experiment (DOE) and a new support vector regression algorithm are applied to CO to construct statistical approximation model in this paper. The support vector regression algorithm approximates the optimization model and is updated during the optimization process to improve accuracy. It is shown by examples that the computing efficiency and robustness of this CO method are higher than with the conventional CO method. Then this new Collaborative Optimization (CO) method using approximate technology is discussed in detail and applied in ship design which considers hydrostatic, propulsion, weight and volume, performance and cost. It indicates that CO method combined with approximate technology can effectively solve complex engineering design optimization problem. Finally, some suggestions on the future improvements are proposed.


Author(s):  
Pascal Prado ◽  
Yulia Panchenko ◽  
Jean-Yves Tre´panier ◽  
Christophe Tribes

Preliminary Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (PMDO) project addresses the development and implementation of the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) methodology in the Concept/Preliminary stages of the gas turbine design process. These initial phases encompass a wide range of coupled engineering disciplines. The PMDO System is a software tool intended to integrate existing design and analysis tools, decompose coupled multidisciplinary problems and, therefore, allow optimizers to speed-up preliminary engine design process. The current paper is a brief presentation of the specifications for the PMDO System as well as a description of the prototype being developed and evaluated. The current assumed e xible architecture is based on three software components that can be installed on different computers: a Java/XML MultiServer, a Java Graphical User Interface and a commercial optimization software.


Author(s):  
Mehdi Mcharek ◽  
Toufik Azib ◽  
Moncef Hammadi ◽  
Cherif Larouci ◽  
Jean-Yves Choley

Purpose Within the current industrial context, companies aim to decrease the design process time and cost. The multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) appears as a solution to accelerate the process and support designers in different stages of the design cycle. However, this relatively new concept needs to be integrated efficiently in the industrial environment and issues related to collaboration, data management, traceability and reuse need to be overcome. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this work is to efficiently integrate the MDO in the industrial design cycle by means of knowledge management (KM) techniques. To take into account the industrial environment, the methodology was applied in a collaborative software. Findings An example of collaborative design and optimization of an electronic throttle body (ETB) controller is presented with industrial requirements. The design problem was solved successfully and demonstrates the efficiency of the methodology in collaborative environments. Originality/value The contributions of this work lie in the structuration of the knowledge to support MDO and the definition of a general way to connect the existent MDO tools to the knowledge base. This methodology will enable to freely link different steps of the design process and reduce considerably the setting time of MDO in industries.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loïc Brevault ◽  
Mathieu Balesdent ◽  
Sébastien Defoort

The design of complex systems such as launch vehicles involves different fields of expertise that are interconnected. To perform multidisciplinary studies, concurrent engineering aims at providing a collaborative environment which often relies on data set exchange. In order to efficiently achieve system-level analyses (uncertainty propagation, sensitivity analysis, optimization, etc.), it is necessary to go beyond data set exchange which limits the capabilities of performance assessments. Multidisciplinary design optimization methodologies is a collection of engineering methodologies to optimize systems modelled as a set of coupled disciplinary analyses and is a key enabler to extend concurrent engineering capabilities. This article is focused on several examples of recent developments of multidisciplinary design optimization methodologies (e.g. multidisciplinary design optimization with transversal decomposition of the design process, multidisciplinary design optimization under uncertainty) with applications to launch vehicle design to illustrate the benefices of taking into account the coupling effects between the different physics all along the design process. These methods enable to manage the complexity of the involved physical phenomena and their interactions in order to generate innovative concepts such as reusable launch vehicles beyond existing solutions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-110
Author(s):  
Jung-Sun Choi ◽  
Gyung-Jin Park

The success of a flapping wing air vehicle flight is strongly related to the flapping motion and wing structure. Various disciplines should be considered for analysis and design of the flapping wing system. A design process for a flapping wing system is defined by using multidisciplinary design optimization. Unsteady aeroelastic analysis is employed as the system analysis. From the results of the aeroelastic analysis, the deformation of the wing is transmitted to the fluid discipline and the dynamic pressure is conveyed to the structural discipline. In the fluid discipline, a kinematic optimization problem is solved to maximize the time-averaged thrust coefficient and the propulsive efficiency simultaneously. In the structural discipline, nonlinear dynamic topology optimization is performed to find the distribution of reinforcement by using the equivalent static loads method for nonlinear static response structural optimization. The defined design process is applied to a flapping wing air vehicle model and the flapping wing air vehicle model is fabricated based on the optimization results.


Author(s):  
Xiaokai Chen ◽  
Chenyu Wang ◽  
Guobiao Shi ◽  
Mingkai Zeng

In order to improve the performance of automotive product platforms and product families while keeping high development efficiency, a product family optimization design method that combines shared variable decision-making and multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) is proposed. First, the basic concepts related to product family design optimization were clarified. Then, the mathematical description and MDO model of the product family optimization problem were established, and the improved product family design process was given. Finally, for the chassis product family optimization problem of an automotive product platform, the effectiveness of the proposed optimization method, and design process were exemplified. The results show that the collaboratively optimized product family can effectively handle the coordination between multiple products and multiple targets, compared to Non-platform development, it can maximize the generalization rate of vehicle parts and components under the premise of ensuring key performance, and give full play to the advantages of product platforms.


Author(s):  
Mohsen Bidoki ◽  
Mehdi Mortazavi ◽  
Mehdi Sabzehparvar

The design process of an autonomous underwater vehicle requires mathematical model of subsystems or disciplines such as guidance and control, payload, hydrodynamic, propulsion, structure, trajectory and performance and their interactions. In early phases of design, an autonomous underwater vehicle is often encountered with a high degree of uncertainty in the design variables and parameters of system. These uncertainties present challenges to the design process and have a direct effect on the autonomous underwater vehicle performance. Multidisciplinary design optimization is an approach to find both optimum and feasible design, and robust design is an approach to make the system performance insensitive to variations of design variables and parameters. It is significant to integrate the robust design and the multidisciplinary design optimization for designing complex engineering systems in optimal, feasible and robust senses. In this article, we present an improved multidisciplinary design optimization methodology for conceptual design of an autonomous underwater vehicle in both engineering and tactic aspects under uncertainty. In this methodology, uncertain multidisciplinary feasible is introduced as uncertain multidisciplinary design optimization framework. The results of this research illustrate that the new proposed robust multidisciplinary design optimization framework can carefully set a robust design for an autonomous underwater vehicle with coupled uncertain disciplines.


Author(s):  
Julia Madrid ◽  
Petter Andersson ◽  
Rikard Söderberg ◽  
Kristina Wärmefjord ◽  
Donatas Kveselys ◽  
...  

AbstractThe automation capabilities and virtual tools within engineering disciplines, such as structural mechanics and aerodynamics, enable efficient Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) approaches to evaluate and optimize the performance of a large number of design variants during early design stages of aircraft components. However, for components that are designed to be welded, in which multiple functional requirements are satisfied by one single welded structure, the automation and simulation capabilities to evaluate welding-producibility and predict welding quality (geometrical deformation, weld bead geometrical quality, cracks, pores, etc) are limited. Besides the complexity of simulating all phenomena within the welding process, one of the main problems in welded integrated components is the existing coupling between welding quality metrics and product geometry. Welding quality can vary for every new product geometrical variant. Thus, there is a need of analyzing rapidly and virtually the interaction and sensitivity coefficients between design parameters and welding quality to predict welding producibility. This paper presents as a result an automated and interactive welding-producibility evaluation approach. This approach incorporates a data-based of welding-producibility criteria, as well as welding simulation and metamodel methods, which enable an interactive and automated evaluation of welding quality of a large number of product variants. The approach has been tested in an industrial use-case involving a multidisciplinary design process of aircraft components. The results from analyzing the welding-producibility of a set of design variants have been plotted together with the analysis results from other engineering disciplines resulting in an interactive tool built with parallel coordinate graphs. The approach proposed allows the generation and reuse of welding producibility information to perform analyses within a big spectrum of the design space in a rapid and interactive fashion, thus supporting designers on dealing with changes and taking fact-based decisions during the multidisciplinary design process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document