Common Property Forest Resources and Participatory Management: Issues in Heterogeneity and Sustainability

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Abhilas Kumar Pradhan ◽  
Rabinarayan Patra
EDIS ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Parkhurst ◽  
Martha C. Monroe

Revised! FOR-182, a 7-page illustrated fact sheet by Jim Parkhurst and Martha Monroe, highlights key wildlife management issues in interface forests and provides background information on potential conflicts. Includes references. Published by the UF School of Forest Resources and Conservation, October 2008.


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
BHIM ADHIKARI

This study examines, in a developing-country context, the contribution of community forestry to household income with particular emphasis on group heterogeneity and equity in benefit distribution. The economic analysis of household-level benefits reveals that poorer households are currently benefiting less in absolute terms from community forestry than less poor households. In terms of the contribution of forests to total household income, the study results suggest that the poor are actually less dependent on forests than the rich, a finding that is somewhat contradictory to results from other similar studies. The average ‘poor’ household obtains Nepalese rupees (Nrs) 7,756 gross income from community forest annually, while the more ‘rich’ households obtain on average Nrs 24,466 per year. In terms of the contribution of forests to net household income, the study results seem to suggest an inverted U-shaped relationship – as income increases dependency on forest resources may decline. Econometric analysis suggests that income from the community forests is related to socio-economic attributes and private endowments of households. Households with land and livestock assets and upper caste households gain more from the commons, while better-educated households depend less on forest resources. Female-headed households benefit less from community forests, further aggravating the inequity in distribution of benefits. The study makes a number of recommendations to improve community forestry in Nepal.


Author(s):  
Ezzatollah Keyhani

Acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7) (ACHE) has been localized at cholinergic junctions both in the central nervous system and at the periphery and it functions in neurotransmission. ACHE was also found in other tissues without involvement in neurotransmission, but exhibiting the common property of transporting water and ions. This communication describes intracellular ACHE in mammalian bone marrow and its secretion into the extracellular medium.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becky Sutherland-Cornett ◽  
Bernard P. Henri ◽  
Brooke Hallowell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document