scholarly journals The International Academy of Cytology standardized reporting of breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology: A 2 year’s retrospective study with application of categories and their assessment for risk of malignancy

CytoJournal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Jitendra Singh Nigam ◽  
Tarun Kumar ◽  
Shreekant Bharti ◽  
Surabhi ◽  
Ruchi Sinha ◽  
...  

Objectives: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. The fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) may be used as the first-line pathological investigation for evaluation and early diagnosis of the breast lesion. The FNAB helps to differentiate malignant from benign lesions. In the present study, we categorized the breast FNAB cases according to the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System (IACYS) for reporting breast FNAB cytology and to assess the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. Material and Methods: A retrospective data of breast lesions were retrieved from the archives of pathology department between January 2018 and December 2019. The study got approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Only 123 cases with cytology and histopathological correlation were included in this study. The cytological category was given according to IACYS for reporting breast FNAB cytology. Results: The FNAB results were include as insufficient material 3.25% (4/123), benign 46.34% (57/123), atypical 12.2% (15/123), suspicious for malignancy (SM) 4.88% (6/123), and malignant 33.33% (41/123). The ROM was 50%, 7.27%, 40.0%, 83.33%, and 97.5% for NS, benign, atypical, SM, and malignant, respectively. Conclusion: FNAB is an important tool in the diagnosis and management of breast lesions, especially in financial constrained developing countries like India with limited resources, where practice of core needle biopsy is limited. The 5-tier IACYS for reporting breast FNAB improves the reproducibility of cytology reports across the world and helps in triaging the breast lesion patients.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Shruti Agrawal ◽  
Michael Leonard Anthony ◽  
Pranoy Paul ◽  
Divya Singh ◽  
Akansha Agarwal ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in breast lesions offers accurate results in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. However, its role is unclear when core-needle biopsy (CNB) is available, the latter providing additional information regarding tumor grade, invasion, and hormone receptor status in malignant lesions. In benign breast lesions, especially in BIRADS category 4a and 4b, FNAB, and CNB provide similar pathological information, whereby FNAB may serve as a more rapid and cost-effective investigation. The study was planned to reevaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNAB in BIRADS category 4a, 4b, and 4c lesions. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> FNAB and biopsy reports of all patients with breast lesions sent between September 1, 2018, and November 30, 2020, were collected and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama category and BIRADS score were recorded for each case. The rate of malignancy and the accuracy of FNAB in diagnosing malignancy were calculated for each BIRADS 4a, 4b, and 4c subgroup. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 249 cases of BIRADS 4 lesions had corresponding cytology and histopathology diagnoses. FNAB showed high diagnostic accuracy in all BIRADS groups. A benign categorization was associated with a very low number of false-negative diagnoses, especially in BIRADS 4a lesions. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The study reconfirms the excellent accuracy of breast FNAB using the IAC Yokohama system in diagnosing breast malignancies. Furthermore, BIRADS 4a lesions found to be belonging to the cytological benign category may be excluded from CRB and kept on clinical follow-up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Field ◽  
Wendy A. Raymond ◽  
Mary Rickard ◽  
Lauren Arnold ◽  
Elena F. Brachtel ◽  
...  

The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) gathered together a group of cytopathologists expert in breast cytology who, working with clinicians expert in breast diagnostics and management, have developed the IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Cytology. The project was initiated with the first cytopathology group meeting in Yokohama at the 2016 International Congress of Cytology. This IAC Yokohama System defines five categories for reporting breast cytology, each with a clear descriptive term for the category, a definition, a risk of malignancy (ROM) and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathology features of each of the lesions within each category will be presented more fully in a subsequent atlas. The System emphasizes that the crucial requirements for diagnostic breast FNAB cytology are a high standard for the performance of the FNAB and for the making of direct smears, and well-trained experienced cytopathologists to interpret the material. The performance indicators of breast FNAB, including specificity and sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and ROM stated in this article have been derived from the recent literature. The current practice of breast FNAB has evolved with the increasing use of ultrasound guidance and rapid on-site evaluation. Two recent publications have shown a range of ROM for the insufficient/inadequate category of 2.6–4.8%, benign 1.4–2.3%, atypical 13–15.7%, suspicious of malignancy 84.6–97.1%, and malignant 99.0–100%. The management algorithm in the System provides options because there are variations in the management of breast lesions using FNAB and core-needle biopsy in those countries utilizing the “triple test” of clinical, imaging, and FNAB assessment, and also variations in the availability of CNB and imaging in low- and middle-income countries. The System will stimulate further discussion and research, particularly in the cytological diagnostic features of specific lesions within each category and in management recommendations. This will lead to continuing improvements in the care of patients with breast lesions and possible modifications to the IAC Yokohama System.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Neha Agrawal ◽  
Kanchan Kothari ◽  
Santosh Tummidi ◽  
Prashant Sood ◽  
Mona Agnihotri ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Breast cancer is rapidly emerging as the leading cause of cancer in Indian women. Robust cytopathology and histopathology services are required to tackle this growing burden. The use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Cytopathology, which offers structured protocols, are expected to improve breast cytopathology reporting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrieved the cytopathology slides, categorized them by the IAC Yokohama System and histopathology data of all the patients who had been investigated for breast lesions from September 2016 to December 2018, and compared the cytopathology and histopathology. Risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance metrics, like sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and area under the curve were computed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1,147 FNABs were evaluated, of which 442 (38.5%) underwent ROSE and 624 (54.4%) histopathology. Reported using IAC categories, our cohort recorded 4.9% inadequate, 65.3% benign, 7.8% atypical, 3.3% suspicious for malignancy, and 18.7% malignant lesions. The overall sensitivity and specificity for identifying in situ and malignant lesions were 99.1% and 99.3%, respectively, and were substantially improved by ROSE. ROSE improved the concordance between cytopathology and histopathology from 76.9% to 90.2%, by reducing inadequate (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) cases. The ROM increased along a gradient from inadequate to malignant categories, with the gradient being sharpened by ROSE. The false negativity rate was 0.7% and false positivity rate 0%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Incorporating ROSE and the IAC Yokohama System for breast cytopathology reporting improves accurate diagnosis of breast lesions, prevents missed diagnoses, and provides reliable estimates of ROM. These protocols also aid in standardizing a reproducible system for monitoring and auditing of breast pathology services, identify areas that need strengthening, and improve training at pathology centers.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shruti Agrawal ◽  
Michael Leonard Anthony ◽  
Pranoy Pal ◽  
Divya Singh ◽  
Anoushika Mehan ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundClassification of breast leasions into different cytological groups (1-5) can accurately be done using the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of breast leasions has been considered to be the primary investigation in detecting breast cancers, especially in low-cost settings. The main objective of this study was to prospectively re-confirm the diagnostic accuracy of breast FNAB using the IAC Yokohama system. Additionally, separate separate secondary subgroup analysis was done to confirm the accuracy of breast FNAB excluding lymph-node positive and lymphadenopathy positive tumors.Material and methodsA prospective study was done in a tertiary care centre in North India on patients undergoing core-needle /incisional/excisional biopsy of breast lesions between 1st September 2019 to 30th November,2020 (519 biopsies on 487 unique patients). Of these 519 histopathology biopsies, 505 had corresponding FNAB report of the same site. The FNAB was reported using the IAC Yokohama system and the most suitable category was allotted in every case. The rates of malignancy for each category and the accuracy of breast FNAB in diagnosing malignancy were calculated.ResultsOf the total 487 patients, 120 cases were benign on histology, while 367 were malignant. The rates of malignancy in benign, atypical, suspicious and malignant categories were 5%, 25%, 71% and 99.7% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of atypical, suspicious and malignant categories was calculated as 90.1%, 95.2% and 93.3% respectively.ConclusionThe high sensitivity and specificity for each scenario for all tumors and for each examined BIRADS category/ies suggest excellent accuracy for Breast FNAB using the IAC Yokohama system.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Sujata Sarangi ◽  
Meenakshi Rao ◽  
Poonam Abhay Elhence ◽  
Aasma Nalwa ◽  
Jyotsna N. Bharti ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background and Objective:</i></b> The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytopathology has been proposed to standardize breast FNAB reporting. The aim of this study was to categorize breast FNAB cases performed by palpation without radiological guidance according to the IAC system, establish the risk of malignancy (ROM) for the categories and assess the system’s utility, pitfalls, and implications in low-resource/financial constraint settings. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of palpation-guided FNAB of breast lesions performed without radiological guidance between January 2016 and December 2019 was carried out and was correlated with follow-up biopsies wherever available. A total of 1,089 cases were recategorized using the IAC Yokohama system. Histopathology follow-up was available for 400 cases. The data were analysed for ROM, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). <b><i>Results and Discussion:</i></b> Out of 1,089 cases, 4.3% (<i>n</i> = 47) cases were categorized as insufficient, 82% (<i>n</i> = 893) as benign, 2.8% (<i>n</i> = 31) as atypical, 2.7% (<i>n</i> = 29) as suspicious of malignancy, and 8.2% (<i>n</i> = 89) as malignant. Some 400 cases had a follow-up biopsy, based on which, the ROM for the categories were 33.3%, 0.4%, 37.5%, 96%, and 100%. The NPV for the benign category was 99.6%. The PPV of the malignant category was 100%, that of combined suspicious of malignancy and malignant categories was 99%, and of combined atypical, suspicious of malignancy, and malignant was 90.6%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The IAC Yokohama system is useful in standardizing the reporting of cytopathology of breast lesions. FNAB with radiological guidance is ideal but in cases of finance/resource constraints, FNAB by palpation alone is satisfactory if the test result is in the benign, suspicious of malignancy, or malignant categories, which constitute 91.5% of the cases in this study. A repeat ultrasound-guided FNAB and/or core needle biopsy should be recommended for cases in the insufficient/inadequate or atypical categories.


1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 705-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Premila De Souza Rocha ◽  
Nisha Sunil Nadkarni ◽  
Suzette Menezes

2005 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruffo Freitas Júnior ◽  
Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira ◽  
Gustavo Antônio de Souza ◽  
Ellen Hardy ◽  
Regis Resende Paulinelli

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy has been accepted worldwide for breast lesions. However, some questions remain, including the appropriateness of the puncture method. The objective of this work was to compare aspirates obtained by the auto-vacuum device and by the syringe pistol holder. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized trial for validation of diagnostic method, at Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás and Hospital Araújo Jorge, Goiânia. METHODS: 351 patients presenting breast lumps underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy, either with the auto-vacuum device or the syringe pistol holder. A single cytopathologist analyzed all of the cytology slides. The rates of insufficient material, cellularity, cell distortion and background hemorrhage were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentages of insufficient material were 16% and 22% (p = 0.18), for the auto-vacuum and pistol aspirates, respectively. Good cellularity was seen in 34% of auto-vacuum and 29% of pistol samples (p = 0.4). Cell distortion was seen in 31 and 26 cases, respectively (p = 0.7). Background hemorrhage occurred in 63 (35%) and 54 cases (31%) (p = 0.2), for auto-vacuum and pistol. The sensitivity was 88% and 86%; specificity 99% and 100%, positive predictive value 96% and 100%, negative predictive value 96% and 95% and total accuracy 76% and 75% for the auto-vacuum and pistol, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results obtained from the two fine-needle aspiration biopsy methods were equivalent. Therefore, the auto-vacuum device is a good option for obtaining aspirates for cytology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 1323-1329
Author(s):  
Jarosław Świrta ◽  
Michał Romaniszyn ◽  
Marcin Barczyński

Introduction: Approximately 10% of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules may be verified as “suspicious for follicular neoplasm”; this category involves follicular adenoma, follicular carcinoma, follicular variants of papillary carcinoma and subclass “suspicious for Hurthle cell neoplasm”. At present, there is no diagnostic tool to discriminate between follicular adenoma and cancer. Most patients are required surgery to exclude malignant process. The aim: To define factors correlating with risk of malignancy in patients with FNAB of thyroid focal lesions and nodules verified as Bethesda tier IV. Materials and Methods: In this study 110 consecutive patients were included. All patients were operated because of FNAB result “suspicious for follicular neoplasm” of thyroid gland at a single institution from January 2016 until March 2020. From this set, six specific categories were defined and the clinical records for patients were collected: sex, age, presence of oxyphilic cells, diameter of the tumour, presence of Hashimoto disease, aggregate amount of clinical and ultrasonographic features of malignancy according to ATA. Results: In 18 patients (16,3%) thyroid cancer occurred. Most frequent subtype turned out to be papillary cancer (66,6%). In group of benign lesion (92 patients) predominance of follicular adenoma was disclosed – (49%). Age, gender, tumour diameter, aggregate amount of clinical and ultrasonografic factors, presence of Hashimoto disease and fine needle aspiration biopsy result suspicious for Hurthle cell neoplasm did not correspond to increased risk of malignancy. Conclusions: In patients with FNAB results classified as Bethesda tier IV there are no reliable clinical features associated with low risk of malignancy and surgery should be consider in every case as most appropriate manner to exclude thyroid cancer


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-103
Author(s):  
Saad Alqahtani ◽  
Saif Alsobhi ◽  
Riyadh I Alsalloum ◽  
Saleh N Najjar ◽  
Hindi N Al-Hindi

ABSTRACT Aim To correlate selected clinical and ultrasonographic (US) characteristics with the final histopathological diagnosis in patients with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), and whether this information can be used in planning the surgical approach. Materials and methods It is a retrospective study including the operated cases of AUS/FLUS from 2011 to 2014 treated at one center. Results This cohort included 87 women and 28 men. To test for independence between categorical variables, the chi-square test was used. There was no significant correlation between age or US variables and final pathological diagnosis. However, final diagnosis of malignancy was higher in men compared with women (64.3 and 41.4% respectively; p = 0.035). Furthermore, a significant association between the diagnosis of repeated fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and the final pathological diagnosis was noted (benign vs malignant, p = 0.005). Conclusion The FNAB has a significant role in the assessment of thyroid nodules. Our results showed no correlation between age, US variables, and the risk of malignancy. Male gender is associated with higher risk of malignancy. Clinical significance Determining the risk of malignancy and prediction of surgical outcome may help triaging cases for repeat FNA or proceeding to surgery. How to cite this article Alqahtani S, Alsobhi S, Alsalloum RI, Najjar SN, Al-Hindi HN. Surgical Outcome of Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance and Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance in Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy. World J Endoc Surg 2017;9(3):100-103.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document