Assessment of COPD Overdiagnosis as an Important Factor in COPD Readmission

Author(s):  
Pandey S ◽  
◽  
Ojha S ◽  

Introduction: The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) was established in 2012 to improve health care by linking payment to the quality of hospital care. Readmission is considered a hospital care quality measure. Under the program, hospitals are penalized for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) readmission, which incentivizes improved care to avoid financial penalties. The effect of COPD overdiagnosis on COPD readmission has not been studied. Objective: The study aims to assess the effect of COPD overdiagnosis in outpatient and inpatient settings on hospital COPD readmissions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study and examined outpatient and inpatient settings for COPD overdiagnosis. In the outpatient setting, we collected all COPD referrals to our clinic and reviewed charts to determine if those patients had COPD or an alternate diagnosis after our workup. We also studied 3-year inpatient data from January 2015 to March 2018 on hospital readmissions and extracted COPD readmissions. For patients seen by a pulmonary provider in our clinic, we studied patients’ pulmonary function test/ spirometry results and charts and determined if they had a true COPD diagnosis or an overdiagnosis. We also assessed the effect of COPD overdiagnosis on inflation of COPD readmission numbers. Results: Of patients referred to our clinic, 46% did not have COPD on our workup. Among inpatients, our results revealed that preventing COPD overdiagnosis could have reduced admissions attributable to COPD by 22.6%. Conclusion: Correct diagnosis using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria is an inexpensive way for hospitals to avoid readmission penalties.

Open Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Jönsson ◽  
Artur Fedorowski ◽  
Gunnar Engström ◽  
Per Wollmer ◽  
Viktor Hamrefors

ObjectiveChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. Despite the well-known comorbidity between COPD and CAD, the presence of COPD may be overlooked in patients undergoing coronary evaluation. We aimed to assess the prevalence of undiagnosed COPD among outpatients evaluated due to suspected myocardial ischemia.MethodsAmong 500 outpatients who were referred to myocardial perfusion imaging due to suspected stable myocardial ischaemia, 433 patients performed spirometry. Of these, a total of 400 subjects (age 66 years; 45% women) had no previous COPD diagnosis and were included in the current study. We compared the prevalence of previously undiagnosed COPD according to spirometry criteria from The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) or lower limit of normal (LLN) and reversible myocardial ischaemia according to symptoms and clinical factors.ResultsA total of 134 (GOLD criteria; 33.5 %) or 46 patients (LLN criteria; 11.5%) had previously undiagnosed COPD, whereas 55 patients (13.8 %) had reversible myocardial ischaemia. The presenting symptoms (chest discomfort, dyspnoea) did not differ between COPD, myocardial ischaemia and normal findings. Except for smoking, no clinical factors were consistently associated with previously undiagnosed COPD.ConclusionsAmong middle-aged outpatients evaluated due to suspected myocardial ischaemia, previously undiagnosed COPD is at least as common as reversible myocardial ischaemia and the presenting symptoms do not differentiate between these entities. Patients going through a coronary ischaemia evaluation should be additionally tested for COPD, especially if there is a positive history of smoking.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella H. Long ◽  
Thomas Southworth ◽  
Umme Kolsum ◽  
Gavin C. Donaldson ◽  
Jadwiga A. Wedzicha ◽  
...  

AbstractBlood eosinophils are a predictive biomarker of inhaled corticosteroid response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated blood eosinophil stability over 1 year using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2019 thresholds of < 100, 100- < 300 and ≥ 300 eosinophils/μL in 225 patients from the COPDMAP cohort. Blood eosinophils showed good stability (rho: 0.71, p < 0.001, ICC 0.84), and 69.3% of patients remained in the same eosinophil category at 1 year. 85.3% of patients with eosinophils < 100 cells/μL had stable counts. The majority of blood eosinophil counts remain stable over 1 year using the GOLD 2019 thresholds.


2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Caramori ◽  
G. Bettoncelli ◽  
R. Tosatto ◽  
F. Arpinelli ◽  
G. Visonà ◽  
...  

Background. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) underlines that spirometry is the gold standard as the most reproducible, standardised, and objective way of measuring airflow limitation in the diagnosis and assessment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). However, studies undertaken in different countries have suggested a widespread underuse of spirometry by general practitioners to establish the diagnosis of COPD. Precise estimates of the prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD in Italy are not currently available. In collaboration with the Italian Academy of General practitioners (SIMG) we have investigated the degree of use of spirometry to establish the diagnosis of COPD in Italy. Methods. A standardised questionnaire has been selfadministered to a sample of 2425 Italian general practitioners (representing 5% of all the Italian doctors involved in general practice). They have been chosen to cover each of the Italian counties. Results. The prevalence of physician-diagnosed COPD was found to be approximately 4%. However, 30% of general practitioners do not use spirometry to establish the diagnosis of COPD. The main reasons given for the failure to use spirometry are (i) that spirometry is not necessary for the diagnosis of COPD or (ii) there are logistical limitations to the access of the patients to lung function laboratories. Conclusions. This data suggests that contrary to GOLD Guidelines, in Italy, as with other countries, spirometry is not always used in the diagnosis of COPD. There is a clear necessity for further education initiatives targeted to this group of physicians.


2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Ambrosino ◽  
M. Di Giorgio ◽  
A. Di Paco

Caring for patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages III and IV with chronic respiratory failure is difficult independent of whether the target is survival or quality of life (QOL). The role of inhaled drug therapy in this specific set of very severe COPD patients has not previously been assessed. The only drug able to prolong survival in these patients is long term oxygen therapy, whereas there is little evidence to indicate long term domiciliary mechanical ventilation in the routine management of stable hypercapnic patients. Supplemental oxygen during exercise reduces exercise breathlessness and improves exercise capacity of the hypoxaemic patient. Pulmonary rehabilitation including nutritional supplementation is a significant component of therapy, even in these severe patients. Relief of dyspnoea with drugs such as morphine should not be denied to severely disabled patients who share poor QOL with cancer patients. Non-invasive ventilation has been used as a palliative treatment to reduce dyspnoea. Lung Volume Reduction Surgery may improve mortality, exercise capacity, and QOL in selected patients, but is associated with significant morbidity and an early mortality rate in the most severe patients. Lung transplantation is a final step in end-stage patients, but short- and long-term outcomes remain significantly inferior in relation to other “solid” organs recipients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document