scholarly journals Unit Cost Analysis of Routine Blood Examination with Activity Based Costing Method At H. Padjonga Dg Ngalle Hospital, Takalar, South Sulawesi

Author(s):  
Adi Sembodo ◽  
◽  
Firman Pribadi ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumiati Sumiati ◽  
Eri Witcahyo ◽  
Andrei Ramani

AbstrakPenetapan tarif dihitung berdasarkan biaya satuan, berdasarkan Peraturan Bupati Bondowoso Nomor 62 Tahun 2017, RSU dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso menghitung biaya satuan dengan metode Double Distribution (DD). Metode Double Distribution (DD) tidak tepat untuk diterapkan karena tidak mencerminkan aktivitas, metode yang berdasarkan aktivitas, tepat dan akurat sehingga dapat memberikan informasi yang tepat adalah metode Activity Based Costing (ABC). RSU dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso belum melakukan perhitungan unit cost dengan metode Activity Based Costing (ABC) terutama untuk instalasi rawat jalan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis biaya satuan dengan metode Activity Based Costing di poliklinik jantung RSU dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso. Metode penelitian dilakukan berdasarkan metode perhitungan Activity Based Costing (ABC). Unit analisis dalam penelitian ini adalah poliklinik jantung RSU dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan dengan data tahun 2017 maka diperoleh biaya satuan electrocardiogram yaitu Rp. 47.689, echocardiography Rp. 113.212 dan treadmill adalah Rp. 221.547. Kesimpulan menunjukkan bahwa unit cost lebih rendah dari tarif yang ditetapkan. AbstractDetermination of rate calculated based on unit cost, based on Bondowoso Regent Regulation Number 62 of 2017, RSU dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso unit cost calculates using the Double Distribution method. Double Distribution (DD) method  is not appropriate to be applied because it does not reflect activity, method based on activity, precise and accurate so that it can providethe right information is Activity Based Costing (ABC) method. RSU Dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso has not made unit cost calculation using Activity Based Costing (ABC) method, especially for outpatient installation. The purpose of this research is unit cost analysis with Activity Based Costing method in the heart polyclinic of RSU Dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso. The research methodbased on Activity Based Costing (ABC) calculation method. The unit of analysis was heart poyclinic at RSU Dr. H. Koesnadi Bondowoso. Unitcost calculated with Activity Based Costing (ABC) method.Based on the calculation resultwith 2017 data a unit costobtained, electrocardiogram is Rp. 47,689, echocardiography Rp. 113,212 and treadmill is Rp. 221,547. The conclusion shown that the unit cost is lower than the specified rate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-110
Author(s):  
Rika Irma Yanti ◽  
Febrian Febrian ◽  
Desy Purnama Sari

Dental clinic is one type of privateowned service enterprise providing dental and oral health services. In the current global era, dental clinics must be able to compete with other dental health facilities. Dental clinics are required to manage effectively clinical management, especially in financial accounting. Unit cost calculation using Activity Based Costing (ABC) method is a modern calculation. It has been implemented in several health facilities. The basic concept of ABC is a product derived from activities that will consume costs. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the application of unit cost calculations with ABC in dental clinics. So it can formulated four steps of unit cost calculation with ABC as follows: preparation of data collection, data collection, ABC calculation of the first stage, ABC calculation of the second stage. The results of the calculation of unit cost with ABC are clinical financial accounting data which are used as a consideration in making desicion of the clinical strategy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
. Soewatoen

Mojowarno Christian Hospital is an organization that is move in health services that produce multi-product, theratio of consumption of each product is different and significant indirect costs therefore needed to determine theservice tariff calculation of unit cost in the hospital with Activity Based Costing Method. The purpose of this studywas to determine the calculation of unit costs of care and outcomes of stroke patients fare calculation using theunit cost from Activity Based Costing method hospital compared with rates prevailing at the moment and ratesINA CBGs. This type of research is a qualitative case study. Based on calculations by the method of ActivityBased Costing obtained Unit Cost for Outpatient is Rp. 749.705, Unit Cost for Emergency Care Unit Mild Strokeis Rp 664.093;Medium Stroke Rp. 1.424.683, Severe Stroke Rp. 2.282.755,-. Unit Cost for Room type III MildStroke is Rp. 3.899.786, Medium Stroke Rp. 5.874.646, Severe Stroke Rp. 7.892.496; Unit Cost for Room type IIMild Stroke is Rp. 4.859.510, Medium Stroke Rp. 7.557.913, Severe Stroke Rp. 10.294.306; Unit Cost for Roomtype I Mild Stroke is Rp. 6.097.530, Medium Stroke Rp. 9.728.198, Severe Stroke Rp. 13.391.856; Unit Cost forVIP Room Mild Stroke is Rp. 10.953.150, Medium Stroke Rp. 18.240.533, Severe Stroke Rp. 25.540.906 ; UnitCost for High Care Unit Mild Stroke is Rp. 3.710.121, Medium Stroke Rp. 5.655.278, Severe StrokeRp. 9.477.309 and Unit Cost Intensive Care Unit Mild Stroke is Rp. 7.010.169, Medium Stroke Rp. 10.605.350,Severe Stroke Rp. 17.727.429,-.Each unit cost plus the cost of materials and direct labor costs, it can be seen thatthe cost of treatment of each disease severity have enough material price difference. It is because the higher theseverity of the disease makes the longer the treatment, the more use the service activities, and service facilities, itsmake the cost is higher. The comparison resoult showed that hospital rates prevailing at this time and the resultsof the calculation using the ABC method for stroke patients is higher than the rate of INA CBGs.


BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l4257 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G Li ◽  
Mehdi Najafzadeh ◽  
Aaron S Kesselheim ◽  
Arash Mostaghimi

AbstractObjectivesTo characterize the trends, drivers, and potential modifiers of increased spending by US Medicare beneficiaries on medicines deemed essential by the World Health Organization.DesignRetrospective cost analysis of Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, detailing annual generic and brand name drug prescribing and spending from 2011 through 2015 by Medicare Part D participants who filled prescriptions for WHO essential medicines.SettingUS Medicare System.Main outcome measuresTotal and per beneficiary Medicare spending, total and per beneficiary out-of-pocket patient spending, cumulative beneficiary count, claim count, and per unit drug cost. All spending measures were adjusted for inflation and reported in 2015 US dollars.ResultsMedicare Part D expenditures on 265 WHO essential medicines between 2011 and 2015 was $87.2bn (£68.4bn; €76.5bn), with annual spending increasing from $11.9bn in 2011 to $25.8bn in 2015 (116%). Patients’ out-of-pocket spending for essential medicines over the same period was $12.1bn. Total annual out-of-pocket spending increased from $2.0bn to $2.9bn (47%), and annual per beneficiary out-of-pocket spending on these drugs increased from $20.42 to $21.17 (4%). Total prescription count increased from 376.1m to 498.9m (33%), and cumulative beneficiary count grew from 95.9m to 135.8m (42%). Of the essential medicines included in the study, the per unit cost of 133 (50%) agents increased faster than the average inflation rate during this period. Overall, approximately 58% of the increase in total spending during this period can be attributed to the introduction of novel agents.ConclusionsSpending associated with essential medicines grew substantially from 2011 to 2015, driven largely by the increased use of two expensive novel drugs used in treating hepatitis C. Approximately 22% of increased total spending during this period can be attributed to increases in per unit cost of existing drugs. These trends may limit patients’ access to essential drugs while also increasing healthcare system costs.


Author(s):  
Eva Glaeser ◽  
Bart Jacobs ◽  
Bernd Appelt ◽  
Elias Engelking ◽  
Ir Por ◽  
...  

Knowing the cost of health care services is a prerequisite for evidence-based management and decision making. However, only limited costing data is available in many low- and middle-income countries. With a substantially increasing number of facility-based births in Cambodia, costing data for efficient and fair resource allocation is required. This paper evaluates the costs for cesarean section (CS) at a public and a Non-Governmental (NGO) hospital in Cambodia in the year 2018. We performed a full and a marginal cost analysis, i.e., we developed a cost function and calculated the respective unit costs from the provider’s perspective. We distinguished fixed, step-fixed, and variable costs and followed an activity-based costing approach. The processes were determined by personal observation of CS-patients and all procedures; the resource consumption was calculated based on the existing accounting documentation, observations, and time-studies. Afterwards, we did a comparative analysis between the two hospitals and performed a sensitivity analysis, i.e., parameters were changed to cater for uncertainty. The public hospital performed 54 monthly CS with an average length of stay (ALOS) of 7.4 days, compared to 18 monthly CS with an ALOS of 3.4 days at the NGO hospital. Staff members at the NGO hospital invest more time per patient. The cost per CS at the current patient numbers is US$470.03 at the public and US$683.23 at the NGO hospital. However, the unit cost at the NGO hospital would be less than at the public hospital if the patient numbers were the same. The study provides detailed costing data to inform decisionmakers and can be seen as a steppingstone for further costing exercises.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document