scholarly journals Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap recosntruction after nipple sparing mastectomy complication: case report

Mastology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (s1) ◽  
pp. 59-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge V Biazus ◽  
◽  
Andrea Damin ◽  
José A Cavalheiro ◽  
Angela Zucatto ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
V. A. Kalantyrskaya ◽  
I. O. Golubev ◽  
E. A. Afonina

Case report on a patient with severe traumatic elbow joint destruction in whom consecutive restoration of common integument (with free Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap) and elbow arthroplasty were performed is presented


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-83
Author(s):  
V. A Kalantyrskaya ◽  
I. O Golubev ◽  
E. A Afonina

Case report on a patient with severe traumatic elbow joint destruction in whom consecutive restoration of common integument (with free Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap) and elbow arthroplasty were performed is presented


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Kyle Yuan ◽  
Kevin M. Lin-Hurtubise ◽  
Mark Y. Lee

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Avra S. Laarakker ◽  
Audrey Rich ◽  
Jeffrey Wu ◽  
Stephanie Fine

Abstract Background Rates of nipple-sparing mastectomies have increased over the past decade. In 2017, acellular dermal matrix was used in 56% of breast reconstructive procedures, with complication rates similar to operations without AlloDerm. Although persistent nipple discharge after nipple-sparing mastectomy is a rare event, it has been described in the literature. Other authors have described evaluation and treatment on a case-by-case basis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report to describe a persistent unilateral discharge after multiple operative revisions and to provide an algorithmic approach to workup and treatment. Case presentation We present a case of a 29-year-old Hispanic woman with BRCA1 mutation who underwent a prophylactic bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using AlloDerm. The year following her operation, the patient underwent two surgical revisions, one for implant rippling and one for asymmetry. Six months after her second revision, she presented to our hospital with a capsular contracture and unilateral clear nipple discharge. Her breast ultrasound showed dilated subareolar ducts and a suspicious mass. Magnetic resonance imaging identified a benign-appearing, rim-enhancing fluid collection. She underwent a third revision. One year later, she returned to our clinic with bloody nipple discharge, erythematous skin changes, and a palpable breast lump. Her surgical biopsy showed a fold in AlloDerm and chronic inflammatory changes. She continued experiencing discharge and opted for nipple excision. During the operation, a lacrimal probe demonstrated a direct connection between the discharging external duct and a seroma associated with an area of unincorporated AlloDerm. The section of unincorporated AlloDerm was excised, and no evidence of malignancy was identified. Ten months later, the patient remained symptom-free and had progressed to placement of final silicone implants. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report to describe a nongravid patient with persistent unilateral sanguineous nipple discharge after multiple operative revisions. A visible communication between the draining duct and a seroma associated with unincorporated AlloDerm was ultimately identified. We present a clinical algorithm for patients with nipple discharge after nipple-sparing mastectomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document